The Rise of Corporations Have Reached Apotheosis – Hillary Clinton is a Corporation – Corporations: Without Remorse, Campassion or Empathy – Explaining Inequality Over $16 Cocktails – The Amoral Decisions of a Corporation – The Most Ruthless Corporations Are Psychopathic – Corporations Are a Derivative of a Person – Hillary Clinton is the “Lowest Standing Corporation”

This information appeared
at the Editor’s Blog

HISTORY IN THE MAKING: Hillary Clinton Would Be the First Corporation to Win the Presidency

They’re people, too, my friend

By Andrew Stiles

July 20, 2015

Hillary Clinton, Inc., is not only vying to become one of the oldest world leaders in history, she is also trying to make history by becoming the first Corporation-American to be elected president. If successful, she would also become the first white Democrat to win the White House since her husband in 1992 (and 1996).

As a corporation-individual, Hillary is uniquely suited to represent the Democratic Party in the post-Obama era, a party that rejects the class-based brand of paleo-socialism espoused by Bernie Sanders, in favor of a soft-core corporatism doused in identity politics. The Clintons reported pre-tax earnings of more than $30 million over the past year by giving speeches to Wall Street banks and other major corporations. This is consistent with the modern Democratic view that individuals/corporation are entitled to obscene wealth [AD note: a fundamental aspect of law is that corporations cannot (by logic) dispose/discharge debts using rights in trust, they must use funds instead of rights. This explains how Hillary Clinton Corporation can amass US$30 million since 2014.] so long as they believe the right things. People like environmentalist billionaire Tom Steyer and former Obama strategist David Plouffe, for example, who currently strategizes for Uber, a massive “sharing economy” conglomerate that principled old-school liberals like New York mayor Bill de Blasio want to destroy.

Like any corporation with a halfway-decent public relations office, Hillary knows how to pander using superficial signaling on social media. Sure, she didn’t support gay marriage until 2013, but she changed her Twitter avatar to a rainbow super fast after that Supreme Court ruling. She knows how to rebrand herself by disavowing and apologizing for past positions most Democrats now find deplorable, such as supporting the Iraq War and her husband’s mass-incarceration policies. Domino’s did the same thing when it apologized for making terrible pizza.

Hillary Clinton is savvy enough to realize that saying “all lives matter” is a faux pas. If you say that, you will be forced to apologize. So, rather than demean herself by appearing at this year’s Netroots Nation conference in Phoenix, where other candidates were heckled by #BlackLivesMatter protesters, Hillary signaled her support for the movement during a Facebook Q&A. Corporations like Hillary Clinton confront difficult issues at a time and manner of their choosing, which is why Hillary waited three weeks to comment on the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and finally did so from an appropriately corporate venue: the OpenSDX Summit and the St. Regis Hotel in San Francisco. When she finally visited the Ferguson area to give a speech on social inequality, she arrived in a private jet just like any self-respecting CEO/champion of “everyday Americans.”

Today’s corporations and their shady oligarchic counterparts understand that in order to be accepted by society they need to be seen as “caring,” by for example, rebranding their products as “green.” Another great way to do this is to give money to charitable causes, or better yet, to start your own charitable foundation. That way, if the corporation or even the charitable foundation itself is criticized, you can easily defend yourself by pointing to all the “good work” you do around the world, and deploying a bunch of corporate nonsense about how your goal is to “promote creative collaboration across antiquated divides.” The Clinton Foundation has successfully deployed this strategy. Hillary has also kept her various scandals under wraps by simply refusing to answer questions. Because at the end of the day, who cares? You don’t have to patronize Clinton, Inc., but if you don’t, just know that you’re on the wrong side of history.

Time for US to secure gains

849 Total Views 1 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post


  • Worth seeing- 60 Minutes Australia, Lords Spies and Predators, Britain’s High and Mighty Sex Criminals

  • May just be me, but that vid misbehaved by starting without direct clicking & then there were constant 'Script Debug' boxes appearing when I tried to shut it down, something which is beyond my meagre skills.

  • If you drop a ball and a plane from the same height they will hit the ground at the same time . SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT HERE , BODIES FALING AFTER THE JET HAD CRASHED VIDEO . It's raining bodies': Harrowing new video captures the moment traumatised couple watch MH17 victims fall from the sky as they drive past burning wreckage in Ukraine

    Read more:
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  • Scott Bennett : How President Obama & Hillary Clinton Created I.S.I.S.

  • In Canada until about 1940, women could not have a person so could not be charged for instance with having contraband on her "person" Think about it. A man or woman how "has not country" is trapped in whatever country they are in and cannot get ID. If they cannot prove birth by certificate they do not exist and cannot use their "person" to so business. Skating around common law using corporate fictional law that does not directly make a claim on the man or woman but on their "person" seems to me a trick. "Person" is a Roman creation as well as "citizen" Also you can be stripped of your person or partially by the courts like many criminals are or those deemed mentally ill. Flesh and blood beings with souls have rights that cannot be changed and are yours by birth on the planet. Persons or corporations ( who are also now persons) have privileges not rights, License is permission of the owner. Who owns your person? Sure is a lot of politicians oughta be stripped of their "persons".