Increasing Talk of a “Civil War” In America

Ed.’s note: If a “civil war” erupts in the US, it will be because of President Trump (Republican Party criminal syndicate) and the Democratic Party (also a criminal syndicate). And the lying culpable media are just as responsible. Both of these political parties are criminal syndicates and are deliberately causing confrontation in America for potential violence. Looking at various “alternative news” websites on the topic of militias and a civil war, there exists in America a fundamental misunderstanding of how “state militias” under the Constitution should be organized and what militias were originally intended to be used for. A previous post was put up explaining what militias are and how they were intended to be used under the Constitution. Readers and those concerned about the growing threat of civil war these two criminal syndicates are deliberately causing, might be interested in going back to read this material:

State Militias and the 2nd Amendment’s Original Intent – Call for Minnesota State Militia?

High Treason Being Committed By “Democratic” Party and US Media Before Our Eyes

Both the criminal syndicates of the Republican Party (and Donald Trump isn’t necessarily part of the RNC) and the Democratic Party system are failing by design. Operatives inside both of these criminal syndicates know that if they can create political conditions where a civil war erupts, they can destroy America allowing both the Chinese and the Russians to overtake the United States. This is going to provide for Americans a tremendous political opportunity to build a third political party and bring forward a candidate. If the right person can be found Americans can run this candidate on the issue of preventing civil war galvanizing Americans to take down this two party criminal system. These two criminal syndicates are driving Americans against one another. There are large numbers of Americans who do not vote in every American election. They obviously recognize the futility of voting. And if you really think about the criminality of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, voting in America today is an “act of terrorism.”

Break up the Dem Party

When Americans are galvanized around the fact these two criminal syndicates are driving America towards civil war, an outcome of unimaginable consequences, this might cause Americans who do not vote to reconsider. These Americans who have become disaffected in this two party political system are now looking for alternatives and solutions to this very dangerous situation Americans have found themselves in. Americans who vote republican or democratic will be presented with new and alternative ideas compared to the sterile counter productive and dangerous policies of the Republican and Democratic parties running these two criminal syndicates. Americans now need to step forward (sorry, turn off the NFL football game and put down your “smart” phones) and take power away from these criminals to determine their own fate. Americans no longer need a government deliberately destroying their interests in favor of the interests of Russia, Israel and China.

If America erupts into civil war, here is one damn good reason why:

In order to prevent the Republican Party or the Democratic Party from seizing control of the institutions of power more than they already have, and using federal military troops to attack Americans in this civil war that is being planned, we can and should establish state militia systems as some states already have. Realistically, the moment shots are fired most will run for cover. State militias must be created and citizens armed to create citizen police forces to protect Americans. This is precisely what the government of Venezuela has accomplished providing AK47s to every citizen who wants one along with training. The Republican and Democratic criminal syndicates must be prevented from using federal troops against the American people.

It is subversive organizations like the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) that define the pretext for potential civil war by running stories on how “civil war rhetoric is being elevated to the national level.” This is how the SPLC (RICO organization) was behind the pretext for the police (not the sharpest pencils in the drawer) ambush and killing of Jerry and Joe Kane in 2010. The SPLC always defines Americans with legitimate complaints as being “anti-government” when this is not the case at all, especially when the SPLC never under any circumstances bring up for discussion these incredibly abusive and criminal banking structures. These criminal syndicates have intentionally caused “domestic disturbances” and possible “insurrection” themselves that would justify them using federal troops. It is completely disingenuous of the US military to even be drawing plans up like this only demonstrating again the US military obeys the Democratic and Republican criminal syndicates. Only state militias and an armed and trained citizen police force should maintain “domestic tranquility” and “quell insurrections.”


As Americans, the next step is to offer proposals for a new debt free currency to eliminate the national debt and secure the future and that of their children. Also to secure the nation for Americans and for their collective future and that of their descendants. American children are facing a lifetime of debt, many who aren’t even born yet, and are facing calamity by abusive banks in this present system since 1913. Americans must now seek out and eliminate those who seek to undermine America. There is simply no reason for Americans to slave their entire lives to pay off a mortgage.

This third party can and should plan for providing for the American people capital and loan resources with reasonable incomes to provide for themselves and have their own homes debt free. Once the nation has been taken out of debt, Americans need to go to war against the banks who utilize usury to attack and destroy America putting the nation in very serious financial and economic circumstances. We face imminent civil war unless every American does a 180 degree turn and rejects totally these criminal syndicates.

If you are thinking about joining a state militia to get involved when the shooting starts without being tracked, you may want to consider either walking to the fight or riding your horse.

14 Billion Police License Plate Database, Knows Where You Are In Real-Time


Andrew Joyce – The Four Pincers of Cabalist Control

There’s Nothing Normal About the Fed Pumping Hundreds of Billions Weekly to Unnamed Banks on Wall Street: “Somebody’s Got a Problem”

This is not a war against Trump, Democrats wants to change the American system


To the Flag Officers:

Monday, October 7, 2019 | By Anna Von Reitz

I have been accused of “not answering” your questions. I have in fact answered your questions and it behooves you to study the answers.

These answers are being made Public and Published so that nobody can misrepresent the situation or a word I say. If you have any other questions, forward them to me; otherwise, I and everyone else in the world will assume that you have in fact and in truth been answered, and that you now understand fully what you are dealing with and what your duty is.

Question 1: Who administered my “Oath of Office”?

I am a Justice of the Peace, an Officer of a State of the Union —- not a “State of State”. We do not now and never have taken “Oaths” of Office. We honor the Separation of Church and State, as clearly enunciated in Everson v. Board of Education, and also honor the Law of the Land, which in the western world means the Bible, which forbids the taking of oaths.

Both these foreign practices, oath-taking and impersonation in office, originate under the international law of the sea. As a result, the only judges who take Oaths of Office are Federal Judges—either outright while sitting on a US Federal Court bench, or as a Jurist for Hire working for an enfranchised State of State.

Those who serve the actual State simply “accept” the Office we are elected to serve as a Public Duty. If you were familiar with the history of the judiciary and land law, you would already know this.

I am working for the State as defined here at (1), not a STATE OF STATE member of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA —the definition listed as (5):

1856- A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.

(1) Definition of United States of America: The name of this country. The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California. “

(5) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property. 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181. But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.

Please note that Bouvier’s is the only Law Dictionary ever adopted for use by the Congress and it is therefore the controlling authority in these matters.

Second, as you know, only Bar Attorneys may serve in Federal Courts and “federalized” — that is, incorporated State of State Courts. This is because they deal in international law of the sea and in global law of commerce. The definition of “bar attorney” taken from an 1801 British Merchant Marine Handbook is “international shipping clerk”. They are supposed to function as Customs Agents aboard ship or be employed in Customs Houses on land. Now, it doesn’t take a great deal of intelligence to determine that we are not aboard ship and I am not involved in administering anything in a Customs House, either. The better question is — what in the hell are all these foreign shipping clerks doing here in our court buildings? And the answer is: the extension of the international law of the sea onto the land is a trespass that was allowed as an “Emergency” measure by the Congress acting in 1865 — a trespass that has never been adequately corrected because the Reconstruction was never completed. If you were familiar with the history of the establishment of the Federal [Military] District Courts, you would know this, too.

Here is where the Sea Courts came ashore:

March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 428), divided the ten Southern states into five military districts, each to be commanded by an officer not below the rank of brigadier general. Under the act the primary duties of these commanders were “to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals.”

Ever since, the use of these courts has expanded, even though they are by definition foreign with respect to our civilian population and lack valid jurisdiction.

That does not mean that our land jurisdiction courts ceased to function, merely that sea courts became common and people forgot (as the present question proves) the difference between land and sea courts.

Third, as you may have cause to know, in 1819, an Amendment to The Constitution of the united States of America was ratified by the States, prohibiting anyone in receipt of foreign titles of nobility from occupying any public office in our Federal government. That includes Bar Attorneys who are all in receipt of the title “Esquire”. Though the States are not bound by the contracts of the States of States, we felt it best to honor this prohibition and not allow land jurisdiction justices to be members of the Bar, which creates a natural conflict of interest, and is inappropriate and unnecessary anyway, as we don’t practice the law of the sea in our courts.

I hope this adequately explains: (1) why neither I nor any other Justice of the Peace takes an “Oath” of Office; and (2) why our civilian courts practice land law, not sea law; and (3) why our Justices don’t have or don’t retain any membership in the Bar Associations.

We, the actual Justices of the civilian courts in this country have NEVER taken “oaths” of office for the reasons I have brought to your attention, so the whole presumption that I would take an Oath of Office or that it would be administered in the manner you presume, is faulty from the get-go.

2. I have no “relationship” with the current Pope, Francis, other than to serve as a vocal critic and reminder of his obligations. I had no “relationship” with Benedict XVI, either, other than a private appointment to speak on his behalf to his employees in the Municipal United States Government, and give them Notice that they are operating in “gross error” —- in direct conflict with their duty owed to the American States and People and in violation of their employment contract.I am not Roman Catholic.

I am a member of the Universal “Catholic” Church at Large, so my business with either Pope is strictly business, and specifically, enforcement of contracts owed to Americans. I brought Benedict’s attention to the misconduct of the Municipal United States Government, including The Dead Baby Scam, and did so in a way that required him to either take action against it, or be exposed as a willing accomplice to the fraud and mistreatment we have suffered.

Please go to Anna Von Reitz to read the entire article.

25293 Total Views 1099 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post

Leave a Reply