Autism: Neutralizing the Deadly Normalizers

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Friday, 28 August 2015

Is autism just another way of being normal? Are non-autistic people “neurotypical” and those with autism merely “neurodiverse”?

On the face of it, this seems absurd. As you will see, when looking at the question more deeply, it is not only absurd but very dangerous. Of course, it is also hugely (and embarrassingly) both ego-gratifying for the “Make Me Feel Good By Denying Reality” crowd, and a deceptive justification/excuse for damaging genes and lives through injections and other toxins, without holding the perpetrators accountable.

When you normalize autism, you also take away the assistance and services which are absolutely necessary to the victims who have been knowingly damaged – sacrificed might be a better term – by governments and agencies whose servile relationship to the pharmaceutical industry has cost us – and them – their health and normal lives.

The truth is that no matter how much it wounds someone’s ego to think that they or someone they love has a problem or a disability, there is simply no way to create “normal” by word magic and a magic wand. That is, however, exactly what this deluded/deluding bunch have in mind. Just as smallpox was “eradicated” by renaming it “monkey pox” (SHAZAAM! Look, Ma! No smallpox, just some of that old monkey pox!) and polio was “eradicated” by renaming it “NON-POLIO Acute Flaccid Paralysis” (couldn’t possibly be polio because it’s called NON-polio… so there’s another SHAZAAM for you!), redefining them did not eradicate the problems, the people who have died from them or their communicability. What it did do was give the vaccine pushers and their adoring publicists the opportunity to deceive and damage further, while selling their toxic brew through more deceptive propaganda.

Here comes some more of it: never mind the emerging and abundant evidence to show that virtually every case of autism is an induced disease, worldwide. Change its name and turn it into just another kind of normal so we can keep vaccinating and sacrificing, and so that the enormous financial and social burdens of the burgeoning autistic population can be pushed off on the families, not the taxpayers.

Well, if the governments, through their taxpayers, created the problem, they need to fund and fix it, don’t you think? If the burden is great enough, they will be induced/forced to end this barbaric sacrificial process, like the people of Carthage who sacrificed their babies in the fires of Moloch. After a while, they ran out of babies. The cost was too great.

But if autism is just another kind of normal, then there is nothing to support, nothing to treat, nothing to fix. We don’t have to stop what we are doing. Fuggedaboutit! Nothing to see here. Move along.

I am a child and adolescent psychiatrist with more than 45 years of experience. I have seen the rise of autism from a rare condition (1/10,000) to a common one (1/55 or worse) and I have watched the supposed “better diagnostic tools” touted and sold. I have treated large numbers of autistic children and their families, and brought about fundamental changes in many of them, to return them to the land of our consensus communication and reality, so that they could give and receive love and enter into their own life well and fully. So I have a very strong opinion on the question, based on extensive review and understanding of neurology, psychology and biochemistry, decades of clinical practice, common sense and a keen political awareness which allows me to smell a shill or a fool from many miles away.

I smell one.

Fiona O’Leary, who is herself an autistic person (she says she carries the diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome) and whose two sons are autistic (vaccinated), says that autism is normal and that any attempt to fix it is wrong and should be forbidden.

Recently, Richie Allen,, asked me to comment on the position of his guest, Fiona O’Leary, that autism is just another shade of normal and that attempts to fix it were both unnecessary and constituted child abuse. I was happy to oblige.

It should be noted that I volunteered to appear on the show with her to discuss this, but she refused, saying that she was not interested in doing joint interviews. I should think not, given her illogical and unscientific position. It would be hard to sustain it in the face of facts and neurology.

Autism is a term that refers to a cluster of dysfunctions and impairments. None of them is normal. Some people are more severely impaired than others, accounting for the concept of the autism “spectrum”.

Cancers are staged (generally I, II, III and IV) based on their severity and how pervasive they are. In the same way, autism is staged based on its severity and how pervasive the dysfunction is. Being politically correct and calling cancer another shade of normal is as absurd as calling autism another shade of normal. They are both diseases that come from deeper, underlying mechanisms being dysfunctional.

Think about what Ms. O’Leary and her ilk would have us believe.

When autistic people are unable to speak or communicate verbally except in the most rudimentary fashion, if at all, how can that be called normal? In what way is losing all speech, and being unable to use speech, even vaguely normal development? Tell that to the parents of a now mute child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Autistic people frequently engage in self-stimulating behavior for significantly extended periods of time, so that no outside stimuli can penetrate their abnormal and obsessive stimulatory patterns, to the total exclusion of all input or communication. In what way is being obsessively focused on self-stimulation, to the exclusion of everyone and everything else, even vaguely normal development? How about the tantrums and violence that can occur when the self-stimulation is interrupted? Tell that to the parents of a now self-stimulating child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Autistic people are often afflicted by learning disabilities so severe that the accomplishment of literacy, mathematics and other academic skills is either totally or nearly totally unavailable to them, leading to no academic or occupational possibilities other than the most rudimentary for some, but not all, frankly autistic people. In what way is mental retardation, even with occasional spotty sparing of unrelated functions (such as the ability to remember dates or highway designations) even vaguely normal development? Tell that to the parents of a now retarded child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Autistic people frequently are stimulus/touch aversive, so that even the tenderest touch is unbearable and unwelcome to them. They are often unable to tolerate hugging, cuddling or other demonstrations of affection; although later, when retrieved from their autism, they can tell us how they longed for that touch and love. In what way is being cut off from the basic human and mammalian capacity to show and receive touch and love, which is essential for normal development and life, even vaguely normal development? Tell that to the parents of a now isolated child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Autism is, indeed, a neurological condition secondary to toxicity. It, like Alzheimer’s disease and post-traumatic head injury, are conditions which cause serious behavioral and other functional deficits. To say that it is in any way normal is exactly like saying that a heart attack, senile dementia, cancer or diabetes is normal. Tell that to the parents of a now ill child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Autism might, frighteningly, become so common that half of the population has been poisoned into having it. If more than half of the people in a group have a disease or condition, it is NORMATIVE, but it is still not normal. What will it mean to our society if we damage half of us so severely that they need lifelong support and care? Who will provide it? Or will they become officially “just another type of normal” so they can be abandoned to their individual fate, without support and help, because it would be just another type of too expensive to take care of those wounded on the battlefield of the Vaccine Wars?

To normalize autism is to bury, either intentionally or for personal reasons, the stark and tragic reality: autism rates are rising exponentially because we are overburdening the detoxification capacity of our children with voluntarily introduced toxins for the accomplishment of other agendas, sacrificing our children for the sake of those agendas. Moloch would be delighted. Big Pharma is nothing short of jubilant. And the dark depopulationists’ agenda is served magnificently. Obscuring this fact with pseudo-normalization serves these forces, not the children themselves and not our real needs.

How do we serve those real needs?  End the sacrifice, support the victims and let the truth be known while we do that. 

Autism, in a nontoxic world, without vaccines or other industrial toxins introduced into the brains of members of the society, appears to exist in some children. There are approximately 5 studies of autism in unvaccinated populations. All of them show exactly the same thing: the health of unvaccinated children is far better than the health of vaccinated ones and the incidence of autism in the unvaccinated population is low to nonexistent. So if unvaccinated people do not develop autism but vaccinated ones do, how can autism be normal? Ding! Ding! Ding! Logic violation alert!

Before the advent of the current onslaught of vaccines in pregnancy, infancy and childhood, about 1 child in 10,000 was autistic (1970).

It is possible that there were genetic or neurological changes in these children, but it was clear from their response to therapy that the only thing that repaired their autism was repairing the damaged bond with their mother, since they appeared to be autistic on the basis of emotional issues and failures in the bonding and connection with their mothers. I know this because using a powerful technique which I learned from psychiatrist Martha Welch, MD, I was able to retrieve these children by assisting them in the bonding process.

Were there neurological changes that were brought about by the damaged maternal–infant bonding that were repaired and normalized by the bonding therapy? It would appear so, since the frankly autistic children treated that way recovered normal function. We presume that they recovered normal structure as well, although we do not have the data to document that.

We do know, however, that their autism, no matter how severe, went away; and they were able to talk about their time as autistic people (very painful according to them) and move into normal, successful lives (joyous for them, according to their own reports). THEY thought they had a condition or disease once they recovered from it. They did not describe themselves as autistic normal, but as suffering people who had been blessed by finding a path to recovery.

The epidemiology is very clear: skyrocketing vaccination rates correlate directly and dramatically with skyrocketing autism rates. Our incidence of first-day mortality, infant mortality and autism are all the highest in the world. Our vaccination rate is also the highest in the world.

The vulnerability of various members of the population differs greatly, but everyone can be overwhelmed by toxic inputs at some point, and will be, if the toxic inputs continue. That means YOU!

Vaccines plus industrial toxins like glyphosate (Roundup®) are omnipresent and lead to tissue dysfunction, including neurological dysfunction. The result is a variety of conditions which are then given names as if they were discrete diseases and conditions. Normal? I think not! Convenient to normalize? I think so!

To say that autism is not a disease because it is a neurological condition indicates one of several things about the person who says it:

1. The speaker has either no scientific background or no scruples. They have absolutely no idea what having a disease or condition means. They do not know, or care, that every disease or condition ALWAYS has a physical representation underlying it, whether or not that underlying cause is known. Of course, that underlying cause may well have been created by environmental or other inputs.


2. The speaker has a hidden, competing agenda and is involved in a whitewash effort to make an inconvenient and/or costly reality go away (as in loss of the vaccine market or agrochemical sales) if widely known and appreciated. In short, we are hearing the words of a shill.

Is autism normal? Ask the parents of an autistic child who regressed after vaccination. See what they have to say about it.

Act Here:

Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima 
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation

Dr. Rima Laibow: “Doctors Are Being Assassinated For Taking On Big Pharma Corruption!” 
Dr Rima Truth Reports – David Noakes – 24 August 2015 

5266 Total Views 10 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post


  • Thanks for another great article. I'm kind of suprised the "pro-autism" crowd haven't attacked Dr Rima and/or able danger like they did before.

  • Quacks unite under the banner of absolute incomprehensibility it seems. For someone who claims to be a psychiatrist with all the experience claimed to be so incredibly ignorant of a neurological condition is to say the least astounding. For a so called psychiatrist to confuse so completely a neurological condition with comorbid conditions as if they are one in the same is reprehensible behaviour. For a so called medical professional to totally disregard major systematic reviews which utterly discount any link between autism and vaccine is reprehensible. For a medical professional to spout the lies of the anti-vax nut job crow is reprehensible and endangering to the health and wellbeing of the community at large.

  • Don't worry we will get round to her

  • Maybe you want to make a list of us all?

  • Does it hurt to be so daft, Dick? Where did you get your medical degree – in a box of Froot Loops?

  • Yes, your names and addresses are being duly noted, don't worry honey.

  • Anonymous will get around to you too, toots.

    We Are Anonymous. We Are Legion. We Do Not Forgive. We Do Not Forget. Expect Us.

  • I hope the broomstick you rode in on to post that inane message didn't leave any splinters you-know-where, Fiona dear! XD

  • Tim is back here attempting to direct attention from the arguments brought up in the article above to irrelevant attacks on Dr. Rima's funding model. At least she's honest and up front about asking for money. We still haven't got a clear answer from Tim or Fiona to the question, where they're getting their funding from. And he and Fiona continue to fall back on ad hominem attacks and profanity against not only Dr. Rima and others but also general commenters on this forum. I suggest to AbelDanger administrators, that if these two do not cease from attacking forum members in this manner, then they should be banned from participating in this forum.

  • It takes one to know one, Phony O.



  • We Are Anonymous. We Are Legion. We Do Not Forgive. We Do Not Forget. Expect Us.

  • what a revealing article ! for people who value health choice and don't wish to see effective autism treatments blocked because of the lies and tantrums of fiona and similar pharma ghouls, repost repost repost !!!

  • Looks like I've stumbled into an elementary school playground being run by a couple of bullies. It's impossible for me to comprehend that this couple has children, let alone having the ability to dictate their medical care. Sad.

  • No it isn't revealing. It is an unsubstantiated opinion. As are some of the statements in the main article.
    The only thing Fiona O 'Leary is guilty of is a passionate belief that autistic children should not be subjected to unproven, potentially dangerous experimental treatment. She considers this abusive and I agree with her. I don't think any of the autism rights campaigners who are against the unregulated trade in ' autism' remedies are against valid treatment and therapy for those more severely disabled by their autism. What we do object to is the dehumanising and discriminatory language used to describe autism as a whole.
    Trading insults online isn't very productive but the O'Learys are not trolling. If a blog article mentions them by name they have every right to respond.
    I would like to know exactly what health choice you think is being given to a child with autism who is being subjected to frightening, sometimes painful and potentially dangerous treatment for which there is no valid medical reason or proof of efficacy. Where is the logic behind being sceptical of big Pharma and yet taking on trust remedies that are heavily promoted for profit just because they are ' alternative.

  • The real ANONYMOUS won't like you pretending to be THEM!

  • Yes my comments were removed too.
    It just highlights the bullying behaviour of ABLE DANGER!
    Faceless people hurling abusive comments, not able to debate.
    Able danger we won't be silenced on this issue and you can abuse and bully as much as you like.
    Autistic people are standing up to QUACKS and FAKE CURES!
    Get used to it!

  • Fiona professionally presented and edited on BBC.

    Wait, the same BBC that housed and protected Jimmy Savile, the man who raped hundreds, if not thousands of children during his extensive career there? The same BBC that has the work of known pedophile Eric Gill outside? The same BBC, known as the Boy's Buggering Club, that reported the collapse of WTC 7 on 911 thirty minutes BEFORE it was actually demolitioned? Yep, there is no agenda.

  • Measles Rights Together

    I AM MEASLES! I AM MEASLES! Don't discriminate against me, for I AM MEASLES! There's no possible cure for measles, it is neuropathological. It is my whole identity, because I have no personality or mind of my own. I'm measleodiverse. I'm measleonormal. I'm doing fine, but give me money because I'm suffering! I'm normal! I'm crazy! I'M MEASLES! I'M MEASLES!

  • You should know sweeety! When GrimV1 tried to ask questions…you deflect and change the direction. What is your source of income?…come on come clean

  • Wow what a bunch of nasty, spiteful people you are. What a tremendously sad existence to be so bitter all the time. Fiona O'Leary you are amazing, keep up the good work xx Heather xx

  • Quack Quack………………………….

  • Keep up the great work 'Anonymous' love your work 🙂

  • If you think that would make a good song Timmy m'boy go ahead it has to be better than your other performances. Earplugs needed! How do you earn a living? I know you won't answer as both you and FO are good at dodging questions.


  • Quack Quack Faceless Coward……


  • That's right…ANOTHER deflection NOT answering a question asked. Typical

  • The maltreatment of people with mental illnesses in prisons in the 19th century inspired the increased creation of institutions to treat them. In Massachusetts, the Rev. Louis Dwight created the Boston Prison Discipline Society in 1825, which advocated for better prison and jail conditions and hospitals for the mentally ill.
    Only severely affected people that were considered unable to live in society were put in institutions. Considering the bad treatment of people that were considered to be "different" by society. The fact that society only recently stopped burning people for witchcraft in the 1700's . Aborigional people were still being put in human zoos or "Völkerschauen" during the 1890's. It was legal to hunt San (Bushmen) in southern Africa until 1936. The way we treated humankind in the 1900's is not something to be particularly proud of or civilised.
    Psychiatric diagnosis was based on symptoms rather than diagnosis.
    Autism wasn't recognised in the 1800's because people had not discovered or researched psychological or neurological disorders to any great extent. Using it as an arguement is as valid as stating there were no medical records from the stoneage so illness is an invention of later civilizations.
    The only reason for the insulting language in the article is to deflect from the baseless assumptions the article makes about vaccines. It suggests lack of empathy. There is no link between vaccines and Autism.
    Autism is a spectrum disorder. People on the spectrum range from highly intelligent and capable of most of societies expectations to those that are institutionalised.
    OCTOBER 22, 1864 to DECEMBER 12, 1889
    Bad company
    Bad habits & political excitement
    Bad whiskey
    Bite of a rattle snake
    Bloody flux
    Brain fever
    Business nerves
    Carbonic acid gas
    Cerebral softening
    Congetion of brain
    Death of sons in the war
    Decoyed into the army
    Deranged masturbation
    Desertion by husband
    Disappointed affection
    Disappointed love
    Dissipation of nerves

    Dissolute habits
    Dog bite
    Domestic affliction
    Domestic trouble
    Douby about mother’s ancestors
    Effusion on the brain
    Epileptic fits
    Excessive sexual abuse
    Excitement as officer
    Explosion of shell nearby
    Exposure & hereditary
    Exposure & quackery
    Exposure in army
    Fall from horse
    False confinement
    Feebleness of intellect
    Fell from horse
    Female disease
    Fever & loss of law suit
    Fever & nerved
    Fighting fire
    Fits & desertion of husband

    Gathering in the head
    Gunshot wound
    Hard study
    Hereditary predisposition
    Ill treatment by husband
    Imaginary female trouble
    Immoral life
    Jealousy & religion
    Kick of horse
    Kicked in the head by a horse
    Liver and social disease
    Loss of arm
    Marriage of son
    Masturbation & syphillis
    Masturbation for 30 years
    Medicine to prevent conception

    Menstrual deranged
    Mental excitement
    Milk fever
    Moral sanity
    Novel reading
    Opium habit
    Over action on the mind
    Over heat
    Over study of religion
    Over taxing mental powers.
    Parents were cousins
    Pecuniary losses: worms
    Periodical fits
    Political excitement
    Religious enthusiasm
    Religious excitement
    Rumor of husband’s murder or desertion
    Salvation army
    Seduction & dissappointment

    Self abuse
    Severe labor
    Sexual abuse and stimulants
    Sexual derangement
    Shooting of daughter
    Snuff eating for two years
    Softening of the brain
    Spinal irritation
    Sun stroke
    Supressed masturbation
    Supression of menses
    Tabacco & masturbation: hysteria
    The war
    Time of life
    Uterine derangement
    Venerial excesses
    Vicious vices in early life
    Women trouble
    Young lady & fear

  • Quack Quack… here's what I'm selling … Quack Quack ….

  • Who's funding you tossers?

  • I cannot find any current medical registration for a Dr Rima E. Laibow.

  • So, after a day or so of this, Fiona and Tim have only proven that they have louder voice and that they cannot debate like adults. And they want to dictate medical policy. They're not qualified to judge what is a valid treatment or not. Which, again, leaves their only strategy which is to continue to try to drown out their opponents by sticking their fingers in their ears and shouting. Sounds typically "autistic" does it not. This is as dangerous a situation as when a patient tries to tell a surgeon how to do his job while lying on the operating table. And speaking of surgeons, I suspect their reaction to the unconventional treatments being raised is a lot like a simple-minded soul would react to seeing a surgeon cut into a patient: Stop! You're hurting her! Stop it!

  • Quack Quack……………

  • UUUUUGHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • This is terrible, some one should report this to the Police

  • Dr Rima Laibow MD

    I am really in need of a donation, please help me ..
    thanks in advance

  • hey! we know you are not the real Dr Rima !

  • Dr. Rima has actually WORKED FOR A LIVING for 45 years – unlike you ignorant trolling bums. It figures a useless mooch like you would be jealous of her success. She's a success, you're a failure. Pretty simple arithmetic.

    People are free to buy or not buy Dr. Rima Laibow's products: that's what intelligent people call a FREE MARKET. I know that's a really difficult concept for an intellectually challenged mooch such as yourself to grasp, Phony, but most people understand it pretty well. Rima Laibow has a doctorate in medicine and a successful business. What are your medical qualifications, Phony? Oh, I see: you play doctor with Timmy…

    WHO'S PAYING YOU AND YOUR SHILL NETWORK, PHONY? You haven't answered the question yet. People are waiting for your answer. What's the matter – cat got your tongue?

  • Timmy, something puzzles me – I was hoping maybe you could help me out here. YOU have no less than SEVEN mouths to feed – so, I ask you again: Where are you getting the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to feed SEVEN mouths? We all know Fiona has a big mouth – that's a given – but it must be expensive for you to feed, clothe, provide for so many people?! I mean, you have no real skills to speak of, so who's funding your operation? Bono? Santa Claus? Aliens? You are proven shills, Fiona and Timmy – everybody knows it! You're not even fooling yourselves. So just admit it and drop the act.

  • Your point being? Since when have parent testimonials constituted scientifically valid evidence of efficacy? I can't find any published results for safety trials let alone for efficacy in treating autism on CD/MMS, feacal transplants, chelation, hyperbaric oxygen, secretin, GcMaf or stem cells. Most of these treatments are invasive and potentially dangerous. Some of them, for example CD/MMS and GcMaf are sold over the Internet for parents to administer to their children with no medical supervision or follow up. Without control groups you have no idea whether any of these treatment do anything at all. Without long term follow up you have no idea what the lasting impact on overall health might be. Autism isn't a static condition, many children can and do develop and progress without any biomedical intervention so how do you know that changes following intervention would not have happened any way?

  • exactly AD , the same BBC that can predict the future, the BBC that was able to predict the future of building 7 a full twenty minutes before it actually got pulled by larry silversperm. But then Flea-ona would have us believe shite that's printed in Murdochs rags.
    Keep up the Good Work.

  • only a danger to rats like you that hate the truth

  • Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack

  • Did you not read or listen to the links posted? Did you hear any of them mention what you listed above as treatments? Foremost was dietary and nutritional changes and rebuilding the immune system through this approach. And do you know exactly what chelation is? When you eat Parsley or Cilantro you are chelating your body of heavy metals. My guess is you have no medical understanding of studies or phrases but use them loosely.

    But the thing that disturb me worse is foremost not realizing vaccine induced autism is a disturbing reality until a child goes from normal to non-responsive following immunizations. Fifty years ago autism was 1 in 10,000, today it is 1 in 55 and tomorrow projected at 1 in 25. The only thing which has changed dramatically from 50 years ago to today is the introduction of 26 immunizations by the age of 2 years, including Hepatitis B vaccine at birth and glyphosate, both immune destroying agents. As one doctor stated, "You cannot get cancer if your immune system is working". Cancer is another immunosuppressive disease, with similar pathology of a compromised intestinal tract found in autism, diabetes, alzheimer's, etc. BTW, what is the standard treatment for cancer? Chemotheraphy…talk about filling your body with toxins and poisons. I think I'll pass. Yet children are even medically kidnapped by CPS and forced chemotherapy. I wish Fiona had the passion to attack that issue.

    The reason Fiona has lost all credibility with me is she never even mentions or acknowledges the underlying scientific etiology of autism in detail. That is a huge warning light that she is either willfully ignorant or being used towards an agenda. Rarely can she answer a direct question on relavant issue without going off into other tagents. And one gets tired of her phrasing her argument that 'we are attacking autistic people', or 'quack, quack, or 'bleach', or 'shocking', or 'my community', and so on. In sales marketing one refers to the message and frequency to create a position. Monsanto taught me that while pushing their drugs.

    So again, you asked for a health choice option and you resorted back to the argument of safety trials for something not even mentioned in the sources I sent. Do you really want options or you just want to stay fixated on your crusade?



  • The article above has a link to an interview with the CEO of Immuno Biotec and discusses the use of GcMaf in the treatment of autism.and refers to the treatment of children by the late Dr Jeff Bradstreet . Dr Bradstreet has promoted the use of most of the treatments I listed. None of which have any proven therapuetic value for autism. If you are saying that you do not endorse the use of any of these treatments and agree with me that it is wrong to use them and then do accept my apologies. I was under the impression that you were agreeing with David Noakes and endorsing his presentation.
    I am not entirely sure what you mean by asking if I want options. Both my autistic sons are fit and healthy thank you.

  • Autism Charley On Blogger since August 2015. I see you found an opportune time to emerge publicly. Yes, I do support Dr. Bradstreet, dead parent due to TWO gunshot wounds….guess he messed up his first suicide attempt, eh? He is the former father of two autistic sons, one who was healthy up to the point of his MMR vaccination, to which he began to decline. Dr. Bradstreet was an EXPERT witness in 2002 to the House of Reprentatives on vaccination. Obviously he spent most of his life trying to right the wrongs of vaccination. You want a band wagon to jump on than stop 22 vaccinations in the first year of a child's life.

  • This is for Fiona O'leary / Brain-Damaged Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine Win $63 Million Lawsuit Against GlaxoSmithKline GSK has paid out $9.1 billion since 2003

    GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is in the news again making headlines after having to settle another major lawsuit bringing the latest total to over $9.1 billion since 2003. This time, it is due to GSK’s product Pandemrix, which was the swine flu vaccine forced upon the public during the pandemic of 2009 (which is argued by some to have been fake). As the victims are being compensated in the U.K., the same neurological mechanisms that damaged the children in the lawsuit are still potentially at work in the confirmed excitotoxicity that takes place after many vaccine injections.

    According to the International Business Times U.K. Edition, each of the victims is “expected to receive £1 million each.” Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants, told the Sunday Times (U.K.):

    “There has never been a case like this before. The victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication.”

    Unfortunately for Peter Todd and the countless other victims, there has been cases like this before. Neurological damage from vaccines is not a rare occurrence. In fact, the U.S. government has paid out $3 billion and counting to families of vaccine-injured children. Most of which were due to direct neurological damage or complications arising from such damage.

    According to The Global Research Project, the GlaxoSmithKline rap sheet states:

    “In recent years, GlaxoSmithKline has become known as the company that pays massive amounts to resolve wide-ranging charges brought by U.S. regulators and prosecutors.

    These included a $750 million payment relating to the sale of adulterated products from a facility in Puerto Rico and a record $3 billion in connection with charges relating to illegal marketing, suppression of adverse safety research results and overcharging government customers. The company also set a record for the largest tax avoidance settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.”

    Related: GSK Swine Flu Shot Sparks Cases of Narcolepsy

    If GlaxoSmithKline wasn’t afforded legal and financial government protection status, they would have went under years ago. However, this corporate zombie still damages populations with little oversight and deep pockets to pay for any legal or ethical challenges that get in the way.

    Currently, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and other pharmaceutical houses were influential in the passing of California Senate Bill 277 to remove the “parental opposition” that was slowing their product’s revenue stream. What wasn’t disclosed during the senate hearing, or vote following, was that the bill’s author Richard Pan had financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline and Merck. In a fair legal system, this should immediately disqualify the bill and bring serious moral and ethical challenges to Pan’s legitimacy.

  • PHONY O'LOL: no one is in the slightest bit interested in what you or your whiny loser friend Emma has to say. Okay? Get the message yet, doofus? How many times do you want to have your skinny ass handed to you on a plate? You seem to be a sucker for punishment, you masochist. How about you take care of your own children for a change, instead of neglecting them? Nobody at all is interested in your whiny, bitchy, ignorant comments. So go jump in a bog, you phony.

  • Tim you stupid git, you are doing a terrible job sticking up for us! I feel embarrassed at how badly you and Fiona have handled this – I am ashamed of you both!!

  • Tu Quoque ! So you think selling unproven and potentially dangerous tratments and inflicting them on autistic children is OK because vaccines are dangerous and cause damage. I'm afraid I don't see the logic of such a position.

  • Autism Charley, you are a DISINGENUOUS MORON. Parents have the right to choose among treatment options for their ill children: FACT. Such treatments would only be DANGEROUS if a MORON like you got ahold of them and didn't follow the correct instructions (as to the proper percentage concentration of a solution to use, for example). LOGIC is evidently not something YOU have any familiarity with. The only thing you appear to know how to do is to EMBARRASS YOURSELF REPEATEDLY in a public forum. If you weren't such a MORON, you'd actually feel some shame at your open, brazen displays of stupidity.

  • Dont be silly. Of course parents dont have the right to choose among treatment options that are unproven and potentially dangerous. That would be child abuse. Dont you have child protection laws in your part of the world? Ah wll, this is not it would appear a site for reasoned debate, if all you can do is shout and name call its not worth the effort.

  • I would also like to point out that there are no 'correct instructions' or established safe doses for treatments such as CD/MMS or GcMaf becuse neither substance has been thoruoughly tested for either saftey or efficacy in treating anything.