Aldous Huxley: “The Ruling Oligarchy That Exists and Will Presumably Always Exist” – Do You Love Your Servitude? – “Global Warming” Is the Environment – Completely Contrary Scientific Views – The Vatican Using “Global Warming” To Consolidate the “Faithful?” – Are You a “Global Warming Denier?” – We Are Long Overdue for a Legal Insurrection – The Catholic Church Stands Behind Green Fascism (What’s New?)
“Global warming”, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, scientific elitism and a contrary theory: we’re going to be freezing our butts off
The first clip is a discussion with Aldous Huxley while he was at Berkeley in 1962 lecturing on the future of science and getting people to consent to what is happening to them. This talk is an extremely relevant topic as we take a look at where science is today which seems to be in disarray concerning “climate change.” That science is in disarray on “climate change” is probably intentional as science has become the dictatorial power over our current circumstances with a technocratic elite clearly in control.
Science today has hideously morphed into a religion of its own creation. The elitism of Aldous Huxley is certainly notorious, so it becomes even more apparent today in this lecture now that we can carefully listen to its content some 53 years later with a keener interest. I want to concentrate specifically on “climate change” which isn’t mentioned by Huxley, but it becomes apparent that “global warming” is being used to facilitate change in society. This in my humble opinion is turning out to be the greatest scam in history as we will see in this presentation. And quite possibly according to John Casey, a very dangerous scam.
As Aldous Huxley suggests: “All revolutions have essentially aimed at changing the environment to change the individual.” “Global warming” is the environment and your mind is being shaped to conform to this “scientific dictatorship” eventually by your manufactured consent. Listen carefully too how Huxley describes “terrorism” used as a technique to force people into submission to the dictates of an elite oligarchy.
Hans Joachim “John” Schellnhuber reminds me of one of these “technocratic scientific elite” using his version of science to convince us of the reality of “climate change”, and how we and the earth are in imminent danger. Looking at Hans Joachim “John” Schellnhuber biography, we can clearly see his elitist background. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, being one of the “leading climate scientists worldwide”, provides advice to, for instance, the President of the European Union Commission, José Manuel Barroso. And as long as José Manuel Barroso has been mentioned, it should be pointed out that after carefully going through Barroso’s bio, José Manuel Barroso is a Knight of Malta. That might only make sense if the Washington Times article is read which is posted below. But anyway, back to Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. Schellnhuber also offers scientific insights to business leaders, being a member of the Climate Change Advisory Board of Deutsche Bank and chair of the governing board of the European Institute of Technology’s Climate Knowledge and Innovation Communities (EIT Climate KIC).
Schellhuber from what we’ve already read is advising a Knight of Malta [Note: The Order of the Knights of Saint John, also known as Order of Saint John, Order of Hospitallers, Knights Hospitaller, the Knights of Malta and the Hospitallers, are among the most famous and influential of the Roman Catholic military orders.] and head of the EU, José Manuel Barroso, who is also closely associated with one of the biggest banks in the world, Deustche Bank. Deustche Bank is at the center of controversy over derivatives with an ominous US$54 trillion in derivatives. How does anyone even possibly comprehend a figure like that? And another really telling aspect of his elitist background, Schellnhuber received the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award in 2002 and was appointed Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in 2004.
There isn’t a scientific organization any more elitist than the Royal Society in the UK. He is also connected to the World Bank and is a long-standing member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (completely corrupt UN organization) with his constant warnings about “global warming.” If that isn’t enough background to elicit suspicions about who stands behind Schellnhuber’s elitist scientific drive to convince us of global warming, I don’t know what would be?
And now finally, a video clip of Schellnhuber on his theory of “global warming”. Listening to this clip makes me think “global warming” and “climate change” are cover to drive the world closer to globalism. Let’s have a look and see…ask yourself if you seriously comprehend fully what it is being lectured about in this clip? I don’t…and I think this is about depopulation…making us feel guilty about our existence.
John L. Casey, the coming “dark winter”, the US$22 billion “global warming” scam and the “decarbonators”
This is a continuation of the above published post in which I’ve stated “we’re going to be freezing our butts off”, which is contrary to the “global warming” scam running up to an alleged US$22 billion now and counting. One look at all the elitist organizations including banks that stand behind “global warming”, and this may offer a clue in this drive to accelerate the “global warming” world-wide political drive.
Instead of calling these scientists associated with organizations such as the World Bank, Deutsche Bank, the Royal Society in the UK, the Club of Rome, the Vatican (Vatican Bank) and a few other elitist organizations pushing “global warming” as scientists, I prefer to call them “de-carbonators”. Based on their drive to reduce carbon emissions re: depopulation (the “de-carbonators”). This is a short clip introducing John Casey’s book Dark Winter: How the Sun Is Causing a 30-Year Cold Spell. So pull over the wool clothing and toss some wood into the fire because it is going to be a bone-chilling summer.
Related reading on Hans Joachim Schellnhuber:
This article unfortunately
appeared at LaRouchepac
On Razor’s Edge: The Case of the Satanic John Schellnhuber
Every aspect of the global strategic situation is on razor’s edge.
The world is poised at the brink of nuclear war, as Obama and the British escalate their provocations against both Russia and China. (Russian President Putin announced today that Russia will acquire over 40 new ICBMs this year, “that will be capable of overcoming any, even the most technically sophisticated, missile defense system.”)
The trans-Atlantic financial system is hanging by the thinnest of threads, while Wall Street and the City of London issue one sadistic ultimatum after another to try to humiliate and make a bloody example of Greece. (Greek Prime Minister Tsipras announced today that he will be meeting with Putin in Russia on June 19.)
Barack Obama is fighting for his political life, and could be removed from office any day or week that Congress stops dodging the issue and decides to act like patriots. (The Obama White House today suffered a second embarrassing political defeat, when they could not bring the TPP fast track bill to a re-vote in the House, because they simply don’t have the votes.)
And the dramatic countervailing momentum generated by the BRICS process is already changing the global landscape, in the run-up to the July 9-10 summits of the BRICS and the SCO, in Ufa, Russia. The corner-stones of an entirely new international economic system are being put in place.
Each of these dramatic situations is not the result of its own internal dynamic, but of the fact that the entire intellectual and cultural paradigm in the trans-Atlantic sector is imploding, bringing everything associated with it to razor’s edge. This is the lawful result of a century of deductive, Aristotelean thinking which equates man’s mind with that of the beast. Call it “Ockham’s Razor’s edge.”
If we would address this problem at the root, we have to return to the principles of rigorous scientific thinking associated with Nicholas of Cusa, Lyndon LaRouche stated today. The question is: Is Man serving God, or is he trying to give Him orders? Cusa demonstrated that Man does not have direct knowledge of the Creator, but achieves that knowledge only indirectly through Man’s own creative Mind. Cusa didn’t try to interpret God; he didn’t write: “God said this; God said that.” Cusa made it clear that his concept of deity was of a ruler of a universal system, and that the universe operates under that higher authority, which Mankind must recognize. It is here that there is close coordination in the outlooks of Cusa with the Confucian philosophy of China today—as Helga Zepp-LaRouche has emphasized.
There is a process in the universe, LaRouche elaborated, which compels Mankind to grow up, through voluntary submission to that higher knowledge. That is the meaning of Man’s unique, willful creativity among all other known species.
That is why, LaRouche continued, it is scientifically accurate to say that environmentalist “green” policies are pro-Satanic, a point with which all valid Christianity agrees, as seen in the example of Cusa. Those who are promoting the authority and views of people like John Schellnhuber, in the context of the upcoming Papal encyclical on climate change, are promoting a Satanic policy. Schellnhuber, Honorary Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (CBE), advocates the radical “de-carbonization” of the entire planet, which would demonstrably result in the reduction of the planet’s population to 1-2 billion people.
Now we are going to take a look at an entirely different perspective on “global warming” only the earth isn’t warming as we are constantly being told, rather, the earth is going to go into a cold period which is explained by John Casey. I would sincerely ask anyone reading this blog to please watch these clips in their entirety and then begin learning all you can about what we are about to experience: either “global warming” or “global cooling?” The sun dictates “global warming” and not man. This presentation is being done by John Casey. John L. Casey is a former White House space program adviser, consultant to NASA Headquarters, and a senior field engineer on the Space Shuttle program. He is one of America’s most successful climate change researchers and climate prediction experts.
Mr. Casey is the leading advocate in the US for a national and international plan to prepare for the next climate change to one of a dangerous cold climate era. This new cold era is caused by a historic decline in the Sun’s energy output, what he calls a “solar hibernation.” Please view the video of Hans Joachim Schellnhuber above and then listen to this discussion with John L. Casey then begin coming to your own conclusions as to the the best you can. Demonstrate Huxley was incorrect about his elitist observations of you as merely a laboratory rat to be coerced into consent. I’ve done the hard work by compiling this information and these videos so begin here making sense of what is going on with the earth and its weather.
According to John Casey this “global cooling” is headed our way and we are apparently going to get clobbered by it. Is this why we are being misdirected by these elite scientists who will keep this science unknown so that if earth is hit with a dangerous cyclical cooling it will kill off a large portion of people on earth?
When this article from the Washington Times is read, one can’t help but think that the Vatican is attempting for us to acquiesce our energy, consent and power over to the Vatican using “global warming” to solidify and consolidate the “faithful”.
This article and video appeared
at The Washington Times (media branch office of the CIA)
How climate-change doubters lost a papal fight
By Anthony Faiola and Chris Mooney
June 20 at 9:26 PM
VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis was about to take a major step backing the science behind human-driven global warming, and Philippe de Larminat was determined to change his mind.
A French doubter who authored a book arguing that solar activity — not greenhouse gases — was driving global warming, de Larminat sought a spot at a climate summit in April sponsored by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Nobel laureates would be there. So would U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, U.S. economist Jeffrey Sachs [Note: Jeffery Sachs is an economist and not a scientist.] and others calling for dramatic steps to curb carbon emissions.
After securing a high-level meeting at the Vatican, he was told that, space permitting, he could join. He bought a plane ticket from Paris to Rome. But five days before the April 28 summit, de Larminat said, he received an e-mail saying there was no space left. It came after other scientists — as well as the powerful Vatican bureaucrat in charge of the academy — insisted he had no business being there.
“They did not want to hear an off note,” de Larminat said.
The incident highlights how climate-change doubters tried and failed to alter the landmark papal document unveiled last week — one that saw the leader of 1 billion Catholics fuse faith and reason and come to the conclusion that “denial” is wrong.
It marked the latest blow for those seeking to stop the reform-minded train that has become Francis’s papacy. It is one that has reinvigorated liberal Catholics even as it has sowed the seeds of resentment and dissent inside and outside the Vatican’s ancient walls.
Yet the battle lost over climate change also suggests how hard it may be for critics to blunt the power of a man who has become something of a juggernaut in an institution where change tends to unfold over decades, even centuries. More than anything, to those who doubt the human impact of global warming, the position staked out by Francis in his papal document, known as an encyclical, means a major defeat.
“This was their Waterloo,” said Kert Davies, executive director of the Climate Investigations Center, who has been tracking climate-change deniers [Note: This is a very good example of the media labeling people and marking them for ridicule despite the evidence of science.] for years. “They wanted the encyclical not to happen. And it happened.”
Papal advisers say Francis signaled his intent to draft a major document on the environment soon after assuming the throne of St. Peter in March 2013. His interest in the topic dates to his days as a bishop in Buenos Aires, where Francis, officials say, was struck by the effects of floods and unsanitary conditions on Argentine shantytowns known as “misery villages.”
In January, Francis officially announced his goal of drafting the encyclical — saying after an official visit to the Philippines that he wanted to make a “contribution” to the debate ahead of a major U.N. summit on climate change in Paris in December.
But several efforts by those skeptical of the scientific consensus on climate change to influence the document appear to have come considerably later — in April — and, maybe, too late.
In late April, the Chicago-based Heartland Institute, a free-market group that serves as a hub of skepticism regarding the science of human-caused global warming, sent a delegation to the Vatican. As a Heartland news release put it, they hoped “to inform Pope Francis of the truth about climate science: There is no global warming crisis!”
It was meant to coincide with the same April meeting that de Larminat was trying to attend. Heartland’s activists were not part of the invited contingent, either, Heartland communications director Jim Lakely said.
“It was a side event,” he said. “We were outside the walls of the Vatican. We were at a hotel — literally, I could throw a football into St. Peter’s Square.”
Seven scientists and other experts gave speeches at the Heartland event, raising doubts about various aspects of the scientific consensus on climate change, even as several also urged the pope not to take sides in the debate. It’s impossible to know how that influenced those in the Vatican working on the pope’s document — which one Vatican official said was at “an advanced stage.” But Lakely said his group did not see much of its argument reflected in the final document.
“We all want the poor to live better lives, but we just don’t think the solution to that is to restrict the use of fossil fuels, because we don’t think CO2 is causing a climate crisis,” Lakely said. “So if that’s our message in a sentence, that message was not reflected in the encyclical, so there you go.”
One member of the Heartland delegation was E. Calvin Beisner, a theologian and founder of an evangelical group called the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation. In April, the group launched an “open letter” to the pope, signed by more than 100 scholars and theologians, arguing that climate-change models “provide no rational basis to forecast dangerous human-induced global warming, and therefore no rational basis for efforts to reduce warming by restricting the use of fossil fuels or any other means.”
Beisner said he thinks that “between a quarter and a third” of the signers were Catholic. He said he is not totally unhappy with the pope’s encyclical — he appreciates the sections on the need to help the poor and “the sanctity of human life.” But as for the climate section, he said, Francis is “writing in an area that is not his own background, and it looks to me as if he was poorly served by his adviser.”
Following his predecessors
Based on the people he recently appointed to his council for science, Francis was also seen to have made up his mind on the question of global warming. Some prominent conservatives — particularly economic and environmental conservatives — were consulted by the Vatican during the process, but “many were sort of shocked that none of their contributions made it in there,” Raymond Arroyo, news director at the Catholic mega-channel EWTN, said Friday.
Instead, the pope sought to build on the progressive environmental platforms established by his immediate predecessors, Benedict XVI and John Paul II. For advice, he turned to a number of scientific advisers who support the consensus that human activity is warming the Earth. They included Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.
A professed atheist, Schellnhuber nevertheless saw a chance for a massive coup in the climate debate if a sitting pope issued an ode to Earth and the ills of carbon emissions. But not everyone, he said, seemed to want the encyclical to take sides.
He said he was stunned to hear that de Larminat, the French doubter, almost made it to the key Vatican climate summit in April. To him, it showed that “even within the Vatican, there were some people who would like to see something that presented both sides.”
De Larminat had a cordial meeting in March with Cardinal Peter Turkson, a senior member of the clergy and a key supporter of the pope’s encyclical. At the meeting, both men said, Turkson promised to try to secure a space for the Frenchman at the April summit.
However, Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences — a body of luminaries, religious and not, dating back decades but with roots in the 17th century — effectively vetoed de Larminat’s presence. Asked why, Sánchez Sorondo responded in an e-mail, “because he’s not an academic authority in this field, neither a religious authority nor a U.N. authority.”
Turkson, however, said that he was told only that the summit was “well overbooked.”
During Francis’s 27 months as pope, something of a conservative resistance has formed to his more progressive tone. It particularly showed itself during fierce theological debates in October that saw conservatives successfully scrap language in a church document that would have recognized “the gifts and qualities” of gay people.
Some conservatives, including U.S. Cardinal Raymond Burke, have publicly denied a rift with the pope while also openly warning of a liberal strain coursing through the church. And a number of leaks in the Italian news media — including of the encyclical itself — have sparked a flurry of intrigue over possible conspiracies inside the Vatican.
Luigi Vicinanza, editor of the magazine L’Espresso, which published the leaked draft of the encyclical, said he had personally obtained it from a source. He would not identify the source but said he did not think the person was “out to harm the pope.”
Still, some pope watchers blame several leaks on an anti-Francis cabal inside the Vatican walls. Others say that not enough evidence has emerged to pin the leaks on a specific agenda.
Sánchez Sorondo, however, denied that there had been significant internal opposition to the pope’s encyclical. He insisted that rather than from inside Vatican City, the primary pressure against its message had come from climate-change deniers — particularly in the United States.
“But it is clear that this pope is very courageous,” said Sánchez Sorondo, who, like Francis, is an Argentine. “He is not a politician. He is not a diplomat. He is someone who is willing to say what others are afraid to say.”
Mooney reported from Washington. Michelle Boorstein in Washington, Virgile Demoustier in Paris and Stefano Pitrelli in Rome contributed to this report.
This article appeared
at the Solari Report
Pope Francis: Care for Our Common Home
June 22, 2015
~ Pope Francis
By Catherine Austin Fitts
A Papal Encyclical is a letter concerning Catholic doctrine which is circulated by the Pope. This week, Pope Francis published a new Encyclical: Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis – Care for Our Common Home.
The 180+ page document sounds the alarm regarding the global degradation of living things: people, animals and our environment.
If this document had been authored by a professor of theology, there would be much room for common ground. However, it has been written by the leader of an institution which has been the single most powerful in the Western world for the last 500 years – a period during which the central banking-warfare model has been busy harvesting our common whole.
There is a profound disassociation from the nuts-and-bolts of what the Catholic Church (and its networks and investment syndicates) have been doing and the sources of their wealth. This Encyclical is, if you will, a concept piece independent of the financial and political realities of the Vatican, the Catholic Church and its allies.
Assuming that Pope Francis first and foremost addressed the Encyclical to bishops, patriarchs, primates, archbishops as well as to the general population, I would like to propose several steps which the Pope, the Vatican and the leadership of the Catholic Church (collectively, the “Church”) might take to integrate some of the best ideas in this document into the power lines controlled and influenced by the Church.
The world is struggling with propaganda, disinformation, and significant suppression of the truth. The new Pope’s efforts to provide digital access to works in the Vatican Library on a selective basis are a good start. In the meantime, there is a great deal of knowledge which the Church, its libraries and networks can share:
The Church can accelerate access to both the Vatican Library and Archives.
The Church can publish all its information regarding global “black budgets.” This would include any information related to invisible weaponry and technology driving the real governance systems operating on Planet Earth.
In the context of understanding what is happening to our environment, the Church can publish all its information on global geo-engineering and weather control programs as part of an open discussion to ensure that the global population and scientific community has accurate data on what is happening to our climate.
The Church can provide open access to its financial information and persuade its affiliates, endowments and churches to do the same, including detailed disclosure on a place-based basis.
The Church can encourage global governments to publish their budgets and credit information on a place-based basis. Place-based financial disclosure will permit the alignment of financial ecosystems with environmental ecosystems – a critical step to ensuring a healthy environment. This will create incentive systems which reward the health and well-being of all living things.
The Church can disclose all information on its direct and indirect involvement in any illegal activities, including vote rigging, narcotics trafficking, and money laundering.
The Church can use its shareholdings and ownership positions in media companies to insist on integrity in public information.
The Church can use its shareholdings in pharmaceutical and food companies to insist on integrity and independence of scientific research.
The Church can provide a safe haven for scientists, journalists and other professionals who are targeted for upholding high standards of integrity in science and information.
2. Individual Freedom
Slavery contributes significantly to the degradation of people throughout our planet.
The Church can withdraw from supporting governments, corporations or any other organizations that support any form of slavery.
The Church can destroy the “control files” of prominent businessmen and politicians created through the use of its networks.
The Church can complete restoration efforts related to its pedophilia activities and publish complete figures on how much the Church has spent on all restoration efforts.
The Church can use its shareholdings and ownership positions in government and corporate securities to insist on a withdrawal of corporate and government support for mind control, torture and slavery and the compromise of individual privacy and sovereignty.
3. Organized Crime & Lawlessness
The primary source of environmental damage does not result from market economics – quite the opposite. It results from the lethal combination of organized crime operating powerful and invisible weaponry coupled with invasive digital systems and sophisticated financial tools on scale. In short, those with the ability to kill, to destroy and to steal with impunity combine such force with fiat currencies, unsustainable debt, resource extraction, financial fraud, war and genocide in order to centralize wealth and power in a manner which shrinks total wealth.
Lawlessness on a global scale must be dealt with before it destroys our planet.
The Church can divest its holdings in governments and corporations which engage in these practices. It should encourage its affiliates and members to do the same.
The Church can also disassociate from foundations and not-for-profits that engage in these practices or that launder profits for those who do.
The Church can make clear that the ten commandments apply not just to what we do, but to whom and what we finance.
The Church can stop any and all participation by itself and its networks in narcotics trafficking and disgorge the profits of the same to the people harmed.
4. Debt & Fiat Currency
No less than The Economist has rightly pointed out that we are chocking on debt, in part because we provide enormous tax subsidies which encourage debt (see The Great Distortion). Debt throws people out of alignment with one another and with the environment around them. Ditto fiat currency which is used in a manner to debase global populations and economies.
We must shift to an equity-based financial system which facilitates the free flow of equity unencumbered by the intervention and control of organized crime. An equity-based system – which includes the financing of small businesses, small farms and local economies with equity – will permit us to evolve a financial system in which we can generate wealth from healing our environment and reducing consumption.
The Church can encourage these changes by shifting the significant funds it manages as well as those managed by its networks.
The Church can encourage governments to reduce laws and regulations that prevent the local circulation of equity or that prevent the creation and success of local currency systems.
5. Sovereignty is Sacred
A global culture is one which respects the sovereignty of every individual. We respect human rights. We respect property rights. We respect privacy. We respect the right of each human being to make up their own mind.
The Church can withdraw its investments from all governments and corporations (including media) which compromise people’s privacy or which manipulate them via mind control techniques, entrainment technology, subliminal programming or electronics.
The Church can actively encourage its priests and networks to bring transparency to mind control techniques or any efforts to mislead people globally.
The Church can offer sanctuary to scientists, government personnel or journalists who bring transparency to these efforts.
6. Capitalism: Let’s Try It
Before we dismiss capitalism, we should try it.
Organized crime is not capitalism. It is the application of force to control and to get one’s way. Market economics can solve many of the problems before us – but we have to unleash markets to work rather than prevent them from operating and then blaming the subsequent “mess” on them.
The Church can call for all monies stolen by illegal means in the last two decades to be returned, including trillions which have disappeared from the US government or which have been accrued as a result of financial frauds prior to the bailouts.
The Church can refrain from blaming our current situation on the people who have been harmed by these thefts or from insisting that the subsequent economic damage is a result of the victims’ poor values or “consumerism.”
The Church can withdraw its investment from financial institutions, governments and corporations that:
Engage in market rigging and intervention.
Provide unlawful or unethical support to cartels and monopolies.
Engage in the purposeful suppression of technologies which would ease the harm we are doing to the environment.
The Church and its affiliates and members manage trillions in real estate and financial assets. As one of the most significant capitalist organizations/investment networks on our planet, it can institute policies to ensure that it does not invest in companies or governments which behave in the manner described in the latest Encyclical and that its real estate is not used to support such activities.
During Vatican II, the Church forced the sale of significant real estate holdings which were serving communities. The proceeds from these sales were reinvested in corporate securities. The Church can ensure that the Orders for whom these funds are managed have access to full transparency about these investments and are permitted to institute policies which ensure that these investments are managed in accordance with the goals of this Encyclical.
Published global military expenditures were $1.7 trillion in 2013. Add secret black budget expenditures and the total was likely much more. These funds – combined with savings from destructive behavior such as gambling, narcotics and alcohol – could be shifted into investment in healing our environment, our education systems, our health care systems and revitalizing global infrastructure.
The Church can bring transparency to all worldwide resources which are related to killing. It can invite its members to pray that these resources be shifted to investments which increase productivity rather than enable a small group of people to own and control the planet.
8. Invite Feedback
Both the Church and our planet are dynamic living systems. Moving to a healthy global culture and aligning our financial ecosystems with our environmental ecosystems is a journey.
The Church can encourage its entire network to adopt these goals in their lives so that achieving them is a partnership of the many for the benefit of all.
The Church can publish an annual report on its efforts to take responsibility and to achieve these goals internally in its own operations, asset managements and investments and to invite feedback from all of its constituents to help it do so.
9. Wise as a Serpent
There is often a risk that any important policy will be misunderstood or misused by those who are centralizing control and power. The G-7 nations have experienced a financial coup d’etat. A great deal of money and assets have been shifted out of sovereign governments into private hands – either illegally or under the guise of trillions in bailouts and quantitative easing – while liabilities have been shifted back into governments.
Now that these transfers are complete, it would be convenient to blame the victims and to abrogate their pensions and other savings plans and promises. It would be unfortunate if this Encyclical were used to justify the value of doing so in the name of “reducing consumerism” or to politically outmaneuver the victims by accusing them of being “selfish.”
Economies function on trust and such trust must come from honoring our agreements. As Pope Francis understands, it is easy to blame the victim and to take from the powerless.
Utah Phillips once said, “The Planet is not dying, it is being killed. And the people doing the killing have names and addresses.”
We commend the Pope for calling out for a cessation of the debasement of all living things. Let us hope that his latest Encyclical starts ringing doorbells – beginning with the opportunity to do so in the Church and in the Church’s asset and investment portfolios.
Here is some additional “new order” fallible crap being shoveled out of the Vatican. A “leaked encyclical” hey? How convenient. So what we have here are obviously duplicitous actions on the part of the Vatican and the popey. On the one hand, the popey is attempting to “declare, define, and pronounce” (infallible encyclical) opposition to “blind faith in technical solutions” to our circumstances, while on the other hand, the popey conveniently and nonchalantly ignores their own blind faith in the this global technocratic bureaucracy and global governmental solutions to “global warming.” I did mention the military aspect of the Vatican’s Knights of Malta didn’t I?
In other words, no countervailing arguments or data are – in the pope’s infallible encyclicals – have any legitimacy whatsoever. Papal infallibility? I would suggest at this critical point we are in urgent need of a legal insurrection to end this silliness. Let’s get grounded in reality here shall we please, the only infallibility the Vatican has at this point is the infallible absorbent quality of the toilet paper in the papal toilet.
Here is an article that appeared in the The Independent recently from the UK suggesting that the any natural cooling of the sun will not be enough to “save earth from global warming.” How preposterous to think that men actually think they know more about the history of the sun and the earth and how they interact going back millions of years. This is nothing more than counter intelligence being used to persuade people the science on “global warming” is “infallible” and correct.
Natural cooling of the Sun will not be enough to save Earth from global warming, warn scientists
And one final thought. Don’t let the Vatican, these elitist organizations, the popey, or the Knights of Malta dupe you into thinking they are going to gift to you in any helpful way or provide assistance in comprehending their malevolent behavior towards you hidden by their use of what is called “nonviolent communication” to get their message of “global warming” across. Don’t fall for it as this gentlemen in this clip calls to our attention.