INFO PANAMZA – The man supposed to have been “warned Friday morning” – according to an Israeli media outlet – of the “impending” attacks is none other than Baron Éric de Rothschild, multimillionaire businessman and president of France’s “Jewish Community Security Service” (SPCJ). Revelations.
2015.11.19 at 19h48
“A Rothschild who is not rich, not Jewish, not a philanthropist, not a banker, not industrious, and who does not lead a certain lifestyle is not a Rothschild”
The author – deceased in 1997 – of this frank declaration?
Edmond de Rothschild, banker, member of the Bilderberg steering committee, and grandson of a historic patron of Zionism.
Missing is an additional qualifier – used notably by stock-market speculators – in his declaration relative to Rothschild heirs: “insider”.
Sunday, November 15, two days after the attacks that stained Paris with blood, Panamza was reporting the troubling revelation – published the previous day – from an Israeli daily newspaper:
Friday morning, those responsible for security within the Jewish community would have learned of “an impending large terrorist attack”, according to The Times of Israel. The author of this confidence: the well-informed Jonathan-Simon Sellem (alias JSS), Franco-Israeli extremist for the Zionist cause and great friend of Meyer Habib.
Wednesday, November 18, Panamza flagged the alteration of the article published in the Israeli press. The initial and precise mention of “Friday morning”, time of the warning, was replaced by an expression watering down the original information: “for months”.
Today, it is possible to identify the principal “official” responsible in France for the “security of the Jewish community”.
It is Éric de Rothschild, 75 years old, son of Alain de Rothschild (ex-director of CRIF), wealthy businessman, president of the Shoah Memorial, successful “kosher” wine grower, and president of France’s “Jewish Community Security Service” (SPCJ, nicknamed the “official LDJ/Jewish Defense League”).
This new information from Panamza is, by the way, corroborated – unbeknown to them – by a site dedicated to Jewish cultural news and called Jewpop.
Exasperated by the revelation from the Israeli press, Alain Granat, host of the Jewpop site, castigated the journalist who gave the floor to JSS. In his column posted online the day before yesterday, he thus indicates having sought input from the principal organization supposed to ensure the security of French Jews: the SPCJ. Needless to say, the organization presided over by Éric de Rothschild assured him that it had never been aware of such information (warning of an impending attack).
Like the ultra-Zionist tandem Cukierman–Ghozlan, Granat attempts to contain the blaze sparked by JSS’ leak. No surprise from a man who was recently invited by CRIF, and whose site Jewpop “benefited from the support and advice of Ezra Venture”, a financial aid group (for any project related to Judaism) that was founded by Vincent Worms (co-director of an Israeli–American investment fund).
Another figure who vainly attempted to defuse JSS’ inadvertent bomb: Rudy Reichstadt.
Historical member of “Caroline Fourest’s Boy Band”, this crypto-Zionist blogger (who gave himself the mission of demonizing anyone likely to question the State’s word within the Western sphere) relayed Granat’s column on his site. Interestingly, JSS sent him this spicy right of reply, presented thusly by Reichstadt:
He formally denies having said that “the Jews knew” that there would be attacks in Paris.
“Obviously, that’s false and dangerous,” he wrote.
He continued: “I simply explained to The Times of Israel that the Jewish community of France, just like all of French national society (police, army, etc.), were in a state of alert. I also added that I had been aware of an SMS from a security expert who wrote to his friends explaining that one has to remain vigilant because of the state of emergency (Vigipirate threat level Scarlet, Rohani visit, Jew stabbed in Rome, failed attempted attacks, etc.). Moreover, I myself was in Paris during the attacks. If I had known something, I would have been suicidal to have been in the vicinity. (…) Be that as it may, maybe I expressed myself badly, maybe the journalist put my remarks on paper badly (…), but of course I never, never, never suggested that “someone knew”, and least of all myself.” Duly noted.
We underline, moreover, that JSS (who indicates that he had been passing through Paris until Saturday, day of his return to Tel Aviv) affirms in his interview given to The Times of Israel having initially envisaged going to the Stade de France (venue around which the first explosions unfolded) before changing his mind – without explanation – and going to the cinema.
And what about the relations between the community-focused Éric de Rothschild and Israel?
To understand his connection with the apartheid, colonialist, and terrorist regime of Tel Aviv, it is necessary to comprehend the dual nature of the Grand Synagogue of Paris of which he is the honorary president: iconic center of Judaism in France but also – as Panamza revealed in May 2014 – recruitment base for the Israeli army.
No surprise, therefore, that Éric de Rothschild was the longtime co-administrator of the “Peres Center for Peace”founded by Shimon Peres, ex-Prime Minister, pleasant face of Zionist expansionism, historic figure of the Paris–Tel Aviv axis, principal architect of the Hebrew State’s illegal nuclear program, and co-director of “Operation Susannah” (Israeli attacks committed in 1954 on Egyptian soil, notably against American–British interests, and falsely attributed to Egyptian nationalists).
No surprise, either, in view of the welcome soon lavished by Éric de Rothschild on the new (very right-wing) ambassador of Israel in France. On December 7, the baron will host her in his capacity as president of the charitable foundation Casip-Cosajor (inspired by “Jewish tradition and the values of the Republic”).
Unknown to the general public, Éric de Rothschild cultivates close relationships with certain influential figures of the country. Illustration in images with François Hollande, Bernard Cazeneuve, Bernard-Henri Lévy, and Pierre Bergé.
Not to overlook two other public figures exposed yesterday by Panamza in a video relative to the medical drill – conducted Friday morning, eleven hours before the carnage – of a “multi-site shooting incident”: Martin Hirsch, director of the Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, and his friend Marek Halter, a writer suspected by French counterespionage of being an “agent of the Israeli services”.
Simulated attacks 11 hours earlier
A fundamental double question remains open:
* WHO informed – on the morning of Friday, November 13 – the SPCJ and its president Éric de Rothschild of “an impending large terrorist attack”?
* WHY was this vital information brought principally – even solely – to the attention of French Jewish community leaders?
One week after the events of 9/11, financial specialists had swiftly noted the existence of insider trading in conjunction with attacks that were filmed by three jubilant Israeli secret agents subsequently arrested by police.
To reveal the background of a new scandal, French citizens anxious to know the truth will have to break through a wall of silence built with the tacit complicity of a press henceforth under “control”. With a key riddle to solve as quickly as possible:
The Paris police today arrested a number of persons after discovering six home-made aerial bombs with which, it is suggested, the Stern Gang intended to bomb London in reprisal for the transport of Jewish migrants to Hamburg.
Rabbi Baruch Korff, chairman of the American Political Action Committee for a Free Palestine, was also arrested near Paris today, together with two others, when about to board an aircraft…
08 Sep 1947 – JEWISH PLOT TO RAID LONDON Six Aerial Bombs.
The real terrorists are people like Irgun and the Stern Gang.
In November 1944, Lord Moyne was murdered by members of the Stern gang in Cairo, and there are reliable reports of the existence of plans to assassinate Government Ministers, including the Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevan.
In 1946, a female agent of Irgun planted a bomb at the Colonial Office in London.
According to Commander Leonard Burt of Special Branch, this would have ‘blown the sort of hole that was blown in the King David Hotel’.
It was only by good fortune that a failure of the pocket-watch timer prevented detonation.
Another Irgun terrorist operating in Britain at the time was Monty Harris.
Harris was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment after being convicted of making thermite incendiary bombs on his premises at Gravel Street near Petticoat Lane.
The use to which these devices were to be put was never established.
Livni and friend
Tzipora Livni was Israel’s Minister of Foreign Affairs.
She is the daughter of Eitan Livni, born in Poland, and Sara Rosenberg, both of whom were members of the anti-British, Jewish terrorist organisation called Irgun.
‘Tzipi Livni, 47, is … the daughter of Zionist guerrillas – terrorists in some eyes – who met in the Irgun, the underground organization that fought the British… and that blew up the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 91 people.
Jewish terrorists bombed the King David Hotel, killing many British people.
‘Her father, Eitan, was the Irgun’s head of operations, and on his gravestone is the map of greater Israel, extending over both sides of the Jordan River…
‘She served in the army, becoming a lieutenant, and at the age of 22 began working for the Mossad, the intelligence service, where she stayed for four years.’
According to The Times Obituary, 5 February 1992:
‘Eitan Livni was born Yerucham Bzozowitch in Gerodna, Poland, in 1919.
‘Livni… in August 1947 was dispatched by Begin to organise Irgun’s military activities against British targets in Europe…
Jews tried to bomb the British Parliament.
The Stern gang (Lehi) were Jewish terrorists.
They tried to bomb the British Parliament.
In 1946, the British security services issued this warning: ‘Members of the Stern group are now being organised and are under training. It is expected that they will be sent to the United Kingdom to assassinate important members of his majesty’s government, particularly, Mr Bevin.’
In 1946, a number of bombs exploded in London, and an attempt was made to drop on a bomb on the House of Commons from a hired plane.
The House of Commons was saved when French Police discovered members of the Stern Gang preparing to fly across the Channel in a plane containing a large bomb.
Mohammed Dahlan, the former Palestinian Authority security commander of the Gaza Strip, further said last week that Hamas was the only party that was laying siege to the Gaza Strip; that it is Hamas, and not Israel or Egypt, that is strangling and punishing the people there.
The Palestinian millionaires, according to the report, have made their wealth thanks to the hundreds of underground tunnels along the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.
Again, this makes sense once one understands that Hamas was created and supported by the Mossad and friends.
Is it time to write America’s obituary? Is it time to say, “Goodbye, America”?
… by Lasha Darkmoon
“We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001
Kevin MacDonald’s review of Wilhelm Marr’s pamphlet Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum, 1879 (The Victory of Judaism Over Germanism), is a fascinating compendium of pessimistic quotations in which German political pundit Marr concludes gloomily that there was no hope left for Germany.
It was finished – yes, as early as the 1870s. The Jews, he lamented, were simply too formidable a foe.
Marr’s pamphlet ends with these chilling words: “Let us accept the inescapable, since we cannot change it. Its name is: FINIS GERMANIAE – the end of Germany!”
1. Is America the new Germany?
I confess I had no idea the outlook was so bleak in Germany as early as 1879. (Marr’s pamphlet has recently been translated into English and is now available in pdf format). I had been under the false impression that the notion of Jewish domination came much later – after the publication of the Protocols (1903) and the Russian Revolution (1917).
We have seen it all happen, though. Germany was brought to its knees, exactly as Marr predicted. Its cadaver now lies rotting.
It was only quite recently that Israel demanded from Germany a further 1 billion euros ($1.4 billion) in Holocaust reparations for its endlessly traumatized Jewish survivors. Almost 70 years after World War II, the grim extortion racket continues unabated.
Though World War II ended 68 years ago, the number of Holocaust survivors today is truly phenomenal. This prompted Norman Finkelstein’s mother to ask somewhat cynically, after she had been cheated out of her reparations money by the rabbis who administered the Holocaust Fund: “If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?”
Wilhelm Marr (1819–1904). His controversial pamphlet of 1879 predicted the end of Germany – 66 years before Germany’s catastrophic defeat in World War II in 1945.
The subject that interests me, however – and which should be of vital importance to Americans undergoing an almost identical trauma at the hands of organized Jewry today – is the question: to what extent was Germany in the days before Hitler’s rise to power a dress rehearsal for what we are witnessing in America right now? What are the parallels? Is it time to write America’s obituary?
Is it time to say, FINIS AMERICAE – the end of America?
Here is a pertinent, relatively modern quotation which will serve as a useful coda to the doom-laden citations from Marr. Read it carefully. It will not only hammer home the points made by Marr several decades earlier, it will also provide the reader with a sharp reminder of the parallel situation in which America finds itself today.
With one significant difference: America is in a far worse condition.
Historian Sir Arthur Bryant summarizes Jewish power in pre-1933 Germany. I have edited this slightly for brevity, omitting the ellipses:
It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Timescorrespondent in Berlin, something like A THIRD OF THE REAL PROPERTY OF THE REICH.
Most of it came into their hands during the inflation. But to those who had lost their all, this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.
The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions, in spite of constituting LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION.
The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly. Every year it became HARDER AND HARDER FOR A GENTILE TO GAIN OR KEEP A FOOTHOLD IN ANY PRIVILEGED OCCUPATION.
At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was EXERCISED BY A MINORITY AGAINST A MAJORITY.
There was no persecution, only elimination. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe.
Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.
Throughout history, Christianity, and especially the Catholic Church, has been a countervailing force against organized Jewry – against a “stiff-necked” people who, while claiming spotless innocence and invariably framing their detractors as irrational and pathological haters, have nevertheless been expelled from no fewer than 109 locations since the year AD 250.
Why has contemporary Christianity failed so abysmally to stand up to the encroachments of organized Jewry and its influence?
This is a question I will attempt to answer now.
2. The Christian Zionists and organized Jewry: fools conned by knaves
Despite its history as the only Western institution that has been able at times to resist Jewish power, the Catholic Church, of which I am a hopelessly dysfunctional practicing member, has proved to be an acute disappointment. It has been thoroughly subverted from within and without. It offers neither guidance nor leadership. So forget the Catholics – a spent force.
One is also forced to conclude that there is little hope that American Protestants could come to the rescue. Their infatuated legions – particularly the 60 million Christian Zionists who constitute the most influential group among them – are in many ways as rabid as the fanatical Jews who seem to have infected them with their zealotry, egging them on to find solace in eschatological ecstasies and millenarian mumbo-jumbo.
Life is indeed so empty and sterile for these wretched lumpengoyim that the only thing that excites their sluggish sensitivities is the prospect of Armageddon and the thought of universal and catastrophic death – the quicker the better.
Whipped into a frenzy of religious fervor by the Grahams and the Robertsons, the Falwells and the Hagees, the Lindseys and the LaHayes, these Christian Zionists have become imitation Jews almost indistinguishable from Vladimir Jabotinsky and Baruch Goldstein.
They believe in a Greater Israel – entailing further conquests of Arab Land – and in the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.
They have “adopted” illegal settlements, and they directly finance the bulldozing of Palestinian homes, the uprooting of olive trees, and the daily oppression of the rightful owners of the Holy Land.
And if push came to shove, they would gladly give their blessings to genocide – and call it “the will of God.”
John Hagee – a major Zionist-American agent
John Hagee, founder of Christians United for Israel: “Fifty million evangelical Christians unite with five million American Jews, standing together on behalf of Israel…. The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.”
There are now 80,000 fundamentalist pastors and clergy preaching their message of madness to these ill-educated Christian masses – in many ways as gullible and gormless as medieval peasants.
The pernicious views of their “pastors” are disseminated by 1,000 local Christian radio stations as well as 100 Christian TV stations. (See here.)
Consider the unimaginable war crimes committed by the state of Israel a few years ago in Gaza. The world saw it happen. Judge Goldstone saw it happen. His meticulously documented report makes it abundantly clear that Israel is a criminal nation, and that its politicians and generals are steeped in criminality.
Later on, under intense pressure and perhaps intimidation, Judge Goldstone backtracked and made lame excuses for these war crimes. In the eyes of many, he damaged his reputation by doing this.
Yet here is Grace Halsell: “Every act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God, and should be condoned, supported, and even praised by the rest of us.”
When I first read this, I couldn’t believe my eyes.
Was this woman crazy? Where had she been since 1948? Hadn’t she heard of the Goldstone Report? Did she have no inkling of Israeli war crimes?
Had she forgotten the Deir Yassin massacre (1948), the Lavon Affair (1954), the Sabra and Shatila war crimes (1982), Qana (17 villages wiped out in 1996), the Jenin massacre (2002), the Lebanon and Egypt terrorist attacks, the atrocities in Iraq from 1990 to the present time, and the horrific Gaza invasion of 2009?
Had she never heard of the King David Hotel bombing of the British? Had she never heard of the Hebron Mosque massacre by Baruch Goldstein?
Had she never heard of the sneak attack on the USS Liberty? Had she never heard of American state secrets sold to the Soviets and Red Chinese? Had she never heard of white phosphorus and cluster bombs and DIME weapons that slice babies’ bodies in half?
Above all: had she forgotten 9/11, the war crime of the century, dressed up to look like an Al Qaeda spectacular?
I need not have worried.
Halsell, I was relieved to learn, was being ironic. She opposed Zionism as much as I did – as any sane and reasonable person would.
Zionist double-talk has become an American institution
3. Why contemporary America is far worse off than pre-National Socialist Germany
I have been accused of needless defeatism by some of my anti-Zionist colleagues. America is far from dead, they assure me. It’s alive and kicking. It’s just a matter of time before good patriotic Americans rise from their slumber, reclaim lost ground, and take back their country. I wish I could feel as sanguine about America’s prospects as these optimists do.
I should like to convince you that the problems facing Germany in the past were far less formidable than the problems facing any potential American rescuer today.
One of the serious negative factors facing America today – a problem the Germans never had – is the existence of vast numbers of Christian Zionists in their midst.
Germany of course had to cope with organized Jewry, a group working from within to undermine the foundations of German society. But one scourge Germany did not have, and which America has, is this scourge of a non-Jewish enemy within: the 60 million Christian Zionists acting in cahoots with organized Jewry to oppose the interests of their own people.
America’s Christian Zionists, it would seem, are their own worst enemy – blithely planning their own demise without knowing it.
So here is Problem Number One for those of you who dream that America could once again become the self-conscious ethnic possession of people of European ancestry: What are you going to do with these 60 million White American renegades who have joined forces with the Enemy? Who are as Jewish as Ariel Sharon or Abe Foxman. Who are hand in glove with AIPAC. Who think ADL means “Advanced Divine Leadership.”
How are you going to fit these thoroughly Judaized allies of organized Jewry into your democratic homeland in which 98 percent of the population are non-Jews – into your country that has been taken over and transformed by the Jews into an Israeli colony?
It cannot be done. So you have a big problem.
4. Israel and its Jewish-American double agents
Another big problem America needs to solve that Germany did not have to cope with is the state of Israel and its powerful lobby in America. Germany did not have Israel hanging round its neck like an albatross. The Germans were not induced to fight wars on behalf of a foreign country. They didn’t invade other countries in order to make the world safe for Israel.
“Since September 11, 2001, the Israeli state, Zionists inside the US government, and the entire leadership of the major American Jewish organizations have been entirely devoted to pushing the US into Middle East wars on behalf of Israel.” – James Petras, see here.
“Today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” – Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, in a speech to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference at Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003.
Almost 5,000 U.S. military personnel have been sacrificed for Israel in Iraq. These are the “officially acknowledged” figures. The real figures have been put at between 50,000 and 70,000 and are probably higher. (See here and here.)
The number of seriously injured soldiers is perhaps ten times the number of the dead. Meanwhile, the number of Iraqis slaughtered amounts to almost 1.5 million, with four times as many driven into neighboring countries as homeless refugees. The cost to the American taxpayer is (to date) over $980 billion, with a total cost of $3 trillion projected. (See here.)
What is even more appalling is that nuclear weapons were surreptitiously used in Iraq – “dirty” weapons designed to produce hideous birth deformities in a “population cleansing war“. Here is America’s handiwork, courtesy of Israel, the instigator of this monstrous war crime.
I think that even the enemies of Zionism before 1948 failed to appreciate the extent to which organized Jewry would maximize its power once it had acquired its own headquarters and homeland – complete with its own military arsenal and espionage facilities. Archimedes provides a hint in his famous quote on the lever, often loosely translated as: “Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.” The Jews now have “a place to stand” – and they certainly are “moving the world.”
The Germans, in addition, did not have a powerful Jewish Lobby holding the entire German government to ransom. German politicians, unlike American ones, were not on Israel’s payroll via campaign contributions from AIPAC and its fabulously rich Jewish supporters. These political donations or “reward money” are bribes in all but name.
Apart from the carrot, there is of course the stick, wielded to good effect by organized Jewry against all American critics of Israel. “Their willing use of force, money, and media slander,” James Petras points out, “intimidates any and all critics, including dissident politicians, media, journalists, and professors.”
In pre-WW2 Germany, the Mossad did not exist. No Mossad was around to monitor the Internet activities of German politicians to see what financial or sexual shenanigans they were up to. Today, in America, it is reasonable to assume that there is constant surveillance of American politicians by Mossad – if not by AIPAC, then by the ADL and their various affiliates. Indeed, the ADL famously settled a spy case that yielded documents with 10,000 names and 600 organizations thought to be insufficiently slavish toward Israel. Legal filings from the case showed that an ADL agent had a floor plan and a key for the office of Alex Odeh, a murdered Arab-American leader.
It follows that the potential for blackmailing American politicians (by Israel’s agents) must today be enormous. Sibel Edmonds asks rhetorically, “Are American politicians being blackmailed? Is grass green?” Her answer: “Of course the blackmail scenario is possible; in fact, highly possible.”
5. Seven reasons why America is in a far worse position today than Germany was when it was under Jewish domination in the pre-Hitler era
Seven crucial points need to be hammered home. These show that America is now in a critical situation from which nothing can save it – nothing except a military coup or violent revolution.
1. Germany did not have to cope with 60 million Christian Zionists collaborating with the goals of organized Jewry; America does.
2. Germany did not have the state of Israel to finance, nor did it have to fight Israel’s wars; America does.
3. Germany’s population of Jews was relatively small compared to America’s: less than 1% of 80 million (roughly 522,000 Jews in 1933) compared to contemporary America’s 2%+ of 314 million (over 6 million Jews).
4. Since Israel had yet to be founded, Germany did not have the problem of dual citizens whose primary allegiance is to a foreign country.
5. Although there were Jewish activist organizations in Weimar Germany, they had not achieved the power and influence of the Jewish ethnic infrastructure in the US. Organizations like AIPAC, the ADL, the SPLC, the American Jewish Committee, and the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations (to name a few) are lavishly funded and influential in all areas of American life, including law enforcement, foreign policy, and all things multicultural.
6. Jews have also erected the Holocaust Industry as a powerful guilt machine for White Americans. Traditional American culture has been substantially replaced by the culture of the Holocaust (“Holocaustianity”) and various other non-White victimhoods, endlessly played out in movies, television shows, and in schools, all the way from kindergarten through university.
7. Above all, Germany was never threatened with multiculturalism. Promoting multiculturalism has been the focus not only of various influential Jewish intellectual movements, it has also been the most important goal of the organized Jewish community, especially since World War II.
Multiculturalism is a deadly weapon against Western civilization – a WMD of truly devastating lethality that in the long run will destroy Christianity, traditional moral values, and traditional nationalist cultures in North America, Europe, and Australia. It will also result in the dispossession and disempowerment of the white race, with the significant risk of brutal mass rape of white women in future ethnic conflicts – as happened to two million German women after World War II.
These are not the fanciful fears of a “racist” – for I regard all manifestations of race supremacy as fundamentally obscene – but the predictions of a pragmatic realist historian. For if multiculturalism were so desirable, why do the Jews promote it so assiduously in all countries except Israel?
“This is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth them…” (Isaiah 42:22)
The situation facing America is a grim one. An epidemic of escalating severity threatens us all. In the course of time, this epidemic of evil is likely to infect Eurasia and spread to other parts of the world like a cancer.
Public debt has increased to almost 70 percent in five years, from $9.9 trillion in 2008 to $16.7 trillion today. China has begun to publicly mock the level of US debt, and is reluctant to continue propping up the worthless US dollar, instead earmarking the country’s $3.6 trillion of foreign reserves for the acquisition of huge chunks of real estate in Europe. Soon they will be buying up America – indeed, the process has already begun.
There are also plans to sell off America’s national parks and post offices, and to drastically limit the value of food stamps to the tens of millions now eking out a miserable existence in tent cities or in deep underground tunnels like sewer rats. Meanwhile, ten American executives took home $100 million each last year, with the top two raking in over $1 billion each. (See here.)
Homeland Security has recently acquired 2,700 armored battle tanks for use in American cities, its own secret paramilitary forces, and 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition – enough to kill everyone in America five times over. A domestic force of this magnitude can hardly have been assembled to protect America from a virtually nonexistent terrorist threat. “This force has been assembled,” Paul Craig Roberts tells us, “to deal with starving and homeless people in the streets of America.”
Alarmist? Not so. Only a few weeks ago, we learned that Obama had set a new litmus test for senior military leaders. They were asked the question: “Are you willing to open fire on your fellow American citizens if ordered to do so?” Those who answered “Yes” were the ones who got the smiles. Those who said “No” were instantly dismissed.
If that doesn’t set your alarm bells ringing, nothing will.
A neo-Bolshevik-style culling of America’s 314 million population appears to be in the cards. If 66 million Russian Christians, according to Solzhenitsyn, were wiped out under Jewish rule in Communist Russia, why should Americans think themselves immune to a similar bloodbath in their own country?
“Wars are the Jews’ harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100 million of them and the end is not yet.” That shocking statement was reportedly made by a French Jew whose very existence is problematic. His name was Rabbi Reichorn, and he was speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon ben Judah in Paris in 1869. Henry Ford was to add later, “And no harvest is as rich as civil wars.”
Even if no such rabbi ever existed, the controversial quote nevertheless encapsulates a frightening truth: that we are at war with an implacable enemy with whom we have been embroiled in a death struggle for the last 2,000 years. And the tragedy is that most of us, like sleepwalkers in a mist, remain totally unaware of the machinations of this enemy or of the looming pitfalls that lie in front of us.
That the enemy is not entirely Jewish, but is made up of an equally malevolent non-Jewish component, hardly needs emphasis. Anti-Semitism, in the final analysis, is not the answer. Our enemy has two faces, and only one face is Jewish.
If you would like a detailed analysis of who controls America right now, click HERE.
When an event occurs that changes the dynamics of the geopolitical spectrum, there is only one question that needs to be asked, no matter what kind of information is being force-fed to the public by the Zionist media: Who does this event benefit? The answer to this question is always: the Zionist elite. The official story presented to the masses in the laughable (and criminally false) 9/11 Commission Report, overseen by Zionist Philip Zelikow, is so dubious and so nonsensical in its arrogance, it is truly amazing that the story was swallowed by the world’s population as truth to begin with. It doesn’t take a scientist, an architect, or an engineer to determine that something other than planes brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 at free-fall speed on that infamous day. Al-Qaeda, Arabic for ‘The Base’ (because it was the CIA’s base of operations in Afghanistan), was not behind the September Eleventh attacks – the Mossad and its Zionist criminal network were. Wake up.
Shocking Prediction or Evidence of Planning?
On September 23, 1979, a very disturbing interview took place between Zionist Michael D. Evans and founder of the Mossad, Isser Harel. Evans asked the former director of the Mossad if (Islamic) terrorism will eventually come to America. Harel proceeded to tell the American Zionist that terrorism will indeed come to the United States: the attack will take place in New York City, and it will be on its tallest building (1). Isser Harel was asked to step down from his post as Mossad chief by the architect of al-Nakbah and notorious racist David Ben-Gurion, because his terrorist tactics were drawing too much attention to the Zionist State. Harel was behind the failed Lavon Affair of 1954, in which Egyptian-Israeli agents placed bombs inside British, American, and Egyptian targets, hoping Muslim groups would be blamed and Western relations with Egypt would be irrevocably damaged. He was also responsible for ‘Operation Damocles’, which left scores of German scientists, writers, and public officials dead under the guise of ‘Nazi-hunting’ (2). After his resignation and subsequent ‘retirement’, Harel remained involved with Mossad, serving as a consultant and advisor to the terrorist agency before it released any information to the public (3).
Harel’s Hand Surfaces Again
Avraham Bendor, former head of Shin Bet, and Peter Zvi Malkin, agents that worked with Harel since he founded Mossad, gained control of the World Trade Center’s security through an agreement with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1987. The name of the company was Atwell Security of Tel Aviv, a subsidiary of Eisenberg Group, owned by Israeli tycoon and Mossad-connected arms dealer, Shaul Eisenberg. The agreement was terminated shortly thereafter for what Edward J. O’Sullivan, the Port Authority’s Director of Special Plans, called “a lack of satisfaction”. The executive director of the Port Authority at the time, who exerted the pressure on O’Sullivan, was Stephen Berger, who has deep connections with other criminals in the Zionist network behind the 9/11 attacks, including Larry Silverstein, the current leaseholder of the World Trade Center (4). It is illogical to believe that the executive director of the Port Authority, a Zionist himself, would hire an Israeli company directly connected to Mossad for World Trade Center security, then terminate the agreement for something as vague as “lack of satisfaction”. It is logical, however, when considering the facts that will be uniformly laid out later in this article: this agreement was initiated and kept in place just long enough for blueprints and intelligence to be gathered for what was being planned by Mossad for the future.
The False Flag of 1993
Ramzi Yousef wasn’t the mastermind of the failed attack of February 26, 1993 – just like Osama bin Laden wasn’t the mastermind of the 9/11 operation. Yousef and his co-conspirators were trained in the art of bomb-making by high-ranking officials in the FBI. Not only was the FBI aware of the bomb that killed 6 people and injured 1,042, it supervised the process and had dealings with members of Yousef’s group as early as 1991 (5). Ahmad Ajaj, a Palestinian who was imprisoned in connection with the 1993 bombing, was exposed by investigative reporter Robert Friedman as a Mossad agent who was trained in an Israeli prison. It was Ajaj who was portrayed by the Zionist media as the ‘author’ of Al-Qaeda terrorist manuals, based on information received by the FBI. This was a Mossad psyop to establish Ajaj as a ‘legitimate’ activist amongst Palestinians (6). TriData Corporation, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, owned by PNAC member and dual Israeli-American citizen Rabbi Dov Zakheim, was granted the contract to oversee the investigation which commenced after the botched bombing and gained valuable intelligence with its unlimited access to the World Trade Center (7). Dov Zakheim would play a major role in the 9/11 attack and its cover-up.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
In 1997, two neoconservative Zionist commentators, William Kristol and Robert Kagan, founded an ultra-aggressive, militaristic think tank which developed and studied ideas that would expand America’s hegemonic dominion over the globe, in association with emphasizing the necessity of strong relations with the Zionist regime. Named ‘Project for the New American Century’, it was the single most influential entity in the policy-making decisions of the murderous Bush Administration, with many of its members actually serving in the administration. In September of 2000, PNAC released a document entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources for a New Century, which discussed the removal of Saddam Hussein and the total destruction of Iraq as a nation due to its threat to Israel, and suggested America would need to “fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars” to further establish its dominance in the Middle East (8). The most disturbing part of the document, however, came with its call for a New Pearl Harbor: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a New Pearl Harbor.” Nobody can deny 9/11 served that exact purpose, galvanizing the American masses behind illegal wars and genocides against Afghanistan and Iraq, all in the name of American patriotism.
Members of PNAC
The authors of Rebuilding America’s Defenses (RAD) were credited as Zionists Donald Kagan (Robert Kagan’s father) and Gary Schmitt, but contributions were provided by many of its elite Zionist members, including: Gary Bauer, Robert Bernstein, US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton, Rudy Boschwitz, former CIA agent William F. Buckley Jr., Frank Carlucci (CIA murderer of Prime Minister of the Congo Patrice Lumumba), war criminal Vice President Dick Cheney, Eliot Cohen, David Epstein, Frank Gaffney, Aaron Friedberg, Charles Krauthammer, aide to the Vice President Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, Lewis Lehrman, Martin Peretz, Richard Perle (who was pegged by the FBI for spying for Israel in the 1970s, but never prosecuted), Norman Podhoretz, AIPAC official Stephen Rosen, war criminal Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Randy Scheunemann, Pentagon official Abram Shulsky, architect of the first genocide against Iraq Stephen Solarz, Caspar Weinberger, architect of the second genocide against Iraq Paul Wolfowitz, Heritage Foundation Director Larry Wortzel, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim (9). All of these men played their role in the orchestration of the tragic events on 9/11 – whether it was the planning; the propagation of the mythologically false, Zionist media-enforced official story; or the aftermath, with the illegal military occupations overseas. RAD can easily be found by placing the title into any Internet search engine.
Lies, Myths, and Propaganda of the Official Story
Any independent investigator’s looking into the events leading up to, occurring during, and following 9/11, will automatically lead to their being labeled with the inflammatory and degrading title of ‘conspiracy theorist’; however, a closer look at the evidence proves it is the ludicrous official story that is the only real conspiracy theory. What the Zionist media has led the masses to believe is that 19 Muslim men, under orders of mastermind Osama bin Laden, with funding from various Muslim charities that were fronts for terrorist operations, hijacked 4 planes with box cutters; bypassed the $400 billion air defense system of the United States; flew the planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, with another plane going down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; the Twin Towers then collapsed, followed by Building 7 (which wasn’t struck by a plane, but collapsed anyway) several hours later. Despite the US government’s knowing absolutely nothing about the attacks, it knew who the hijackers were, who plotted the operation, where they were hiding, and how they carried out the terror in a matter of hours – though no formal investigation was conducted. That is the actual, literal, widely accepted mainstream theory. And it is pathetic.
There were no Arabic/Islamic names on the passenger lists released by United Airlines and American Airlines (10); so where did the Muslim men come from? At least 8 of the men who are said to be the suicidal hijackers by the FBI, are actually alive and well in various countries (11). Osama bin Laden, whose name has been used to justify a genocidal occupation in Afghanistan that has claimed hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, is dead. It’s been a known fact worldwide that he’s been dead for 9 years; it’s even been reported (perhaps out of intentional arrogance) by Mossad (12). Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA under the name of Tim Osman, and had numerous personal and financial ventures with the Bush crime family and the corrupt Saudi regime, extracting funds from both of them and taking orders from US intelligence until his death at the very end of 2001. If the CIA ever had any intention of arresting bin Laden to begin with, they would have done so when bin Laden met with CIA officials in Dubai just two months before 9/11 (13). All the reports of Muslim charities’ funding terror, the Al-Qaeda videos, and the bin Laden recordings have been the work of two Mossad-connected contractors. The IntelCenter is run by Mossad agent Ben Venzke, and is notorious for releasing videos of an ‘al-Qaeda’ operative named Adam Yahiye Gadahn, whose real name has been revealed as Adam Pearlman; Pearlman is the grandson of a former director of Israel’s propaganda arm, the ADL of B’nai B’rith (14). SITE Intelligence Group, founded by former IOF soldier Rita Katz, is the major provider of intelligence on ‘Islamic terror groups’ – not just for the Zionist media, but for the US Government’s agencies as well (15).
The multi-layered, extremely advanced air defense system of the US, along with F-16 responses to any foreign activity in restricted airspace, were rendered ineffective due to three main factors. The first factor was Vice President Cheney’s issuing stand-down orders from the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (16). The second factor was the multiple war game exercises being conducted by the American military, that diverted the attention of responders away from the actual attacks (17). And the final factor, perhaps the most important and most damning piece of evidence, is the subversion of US Government computer networks by a company called Ptech, controlled by yet another Mossad agent, named Michael Goff. Goff’s father and grandfather were deeply involved in Zionist activities, as their initiation into the B’nai B’rith Commonwealth Lodge in Worcester, Massachusetts confirms (18). Flight 93, which was the subject of the romanticized Hollywood film United 93, entirely written and produced by Zionists (Kate Solomon, Lloyd Levin, Paul Greengrass, Eric Fellner, Liza Chasin, Michael Bronner, Tim Bevan, and Mairi Bett), did not crash into a field in Pennsylvania. [AD note: There is ample eyewitness, coroner, and local newspaper evidence that a passenger plane was destroyed on 9/11 in Pennsylvania, leaving an 8-mile debris trail (that included fragmented human remains) stretching from Shanksville via Indian Lake to New Baltimore, PA – whatever the specific plane or flight number was. Readers, if you’re unaware of these reports and are curious to learn more, evidence can easily be found by placing relevant search terms into any Internet search engine – you can take the initiative yourself.] It landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport, as was reported by local media on 9/11 (19). [AD: This was indeed reported – whatever plane it actually was that landed there (perhaps a drone intended to be switched for Flight 93 during the live-fly exercises). Many questionable or conflicting reports were issued by various media in the confusion of live 9/11 coverage.] The only plane that hit the Pentagon was an unmanned Global Hawk, and there is eyewitness testimony to substantiate this revelation (20). [AD: There is considerable dispute as to what flying weapons platform (some say a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior; some say a missile…) struck the Pentagon – a conundrum that was probably pre-scripted in order to trigger fractious debate. Further, there is much evidence that bombs had been pre-placed and were detonated in Wedge 1 of the Pentagon; some sources tell of two explosion events, a number of minutes apart.]
A 32-story Spanish skyscraper, the Windsor Building, burned for 24 hours but remained standing. The idea of steel-framed buildings collapsing from fire is absolutely asinine. It has never happened in the history of modern architecture. 1,277 verified architectural and engineering professionals have already signed a petition demanding a reopening of the 9/11 investigation, due to the illegitimacy of the mechanics in the official story. Professor Steven Jones of BYU discovered thermate and thermite (extremely destructive chemicals used in explosives) in samples he collected from Ground Zero, exposing the truth of a controlled demolition (21). Ultra-Zionist Larry Silverstein, leaseholder of the Twin Towers and chief asset in the Mossad operation on 9/11, raised the eyebrows of many during an interview with PBS in September of 2002: “I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.’ Uh, and they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.” (22). ‘Pull it’ is common terminology used before the demolition of a building. Silverstein had much to gain from the destruction of the Twin Towers, and even more to gain from the destruction of Building 7, which went down at 5:20 p.m., though it wasn’t struck by a plane. If there wasn’t anything questionable about the collapse, why wasn’t it mentioned in Zionist Zelikow’s distorted 9/11 Commission Report?
Privatization, Insider Trading, and Profiteering
On July 23, 2001, Zionist Lewis Eisenberg, a prominent member of the pro-Israel Lobby, and the head of the Port Authority at the time, finalized the deal that would privatize the World Trade Center for the first time in its history (23). Ronald Lauder, of the notorious Zionist company Estée Lauder Cosmetics, is a major player in the pro-Israel Lobby, boasting active membership in the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, World Jewish Congress, Jewish National Fund, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Abraham Fund, Jewish Theological Seminary, and the ADL of B’nai B’rith. He also donated a school named after him, the Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy, to the Interdisciplinary Center of Herzliya, a Mossad training ground. Lauder was the chairman of two organizations, the New York State Commission on Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization, that introduced the concept of privatization to the Port Authority, and aggressively lobbied for it after the introduction (24).
The new leaseholders were United Jewish Appeal board member, ultra-Zionist Larry Silverstein, and former Haganah terrorist and Golani Brigade commando, billionaire Frank Lowy, whose mall conglomerate Westfield America was guaranteed 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Eisenberg, Lauder, Lowy, and Silverstein all had close, friendly ties with Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and Ariel Sharon; Silverstein even had phone conversations with the current Zionist entity prime minister every Sunday (25). An anti-terrorism insurance contract was established with Swiss Reinsurance, which would pay out $3.5 billion for a single terrorist attack, and an additional payment of the same amount for two terrorist attacks; hence why the Salomon Brothers Building, better known as Building 7, was destroyed. Silverstein adopted this policy six weeks before 9/11 (26). Silverstein’s battle with the insurance company was eventually decided in his favor by Zionist Judge Michael Mukasey, who determined that the planes’ crashing into the Twin Towers constituted multiple terror attacks, and the fate of Building 7 wasn’t necessary for the ruling (27). Mukasey would play a crucial role in discharging the Mossad agents captured on 9/11, and would later go on to become Attorney General for war criminal George W. Bush’s administration (28).
Between August 26th and September 11th 2001, a group of financial speculators, identified as Israeli citizens by the SEC, short sold 38 stocks and purchased put options in mass on Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AIG, Swiss Re and Munich Re, United Airlines and American Airlines. All of these companies were directly involved with the 9/11 attacks. The Israeli speculators were never investigated any further, and they were most certainly not arrested (29). 70,000 tons of World Trade Center steel were shipped to China and India for $120 a ton. The purchaser of the scrap was Metals Management, owned by Zionist Alan D. Ratner (30). It is no coincidence that Zionist Michael Bloomberg (31) became mayor of New York right after the 9/11 assault. One of his first acts as mayor was to cover up AIG CEO and Zionist criminal Maurice Greenberg’s put option scam through Bear Stearns and Swiss Reinsurance (32). It was Bloomberg who awarded the clean-up contract to Ratner’s company so the steel would be disposed of, and to prevent its examination by NIST – which was controlled by yet another Zionist, Stephen Cauffman (33), the “Leader of the Structures Group of the Materials and Construction Research Division”, according to the official NIST website.
John O’Neill: Sabotaged and Murdered
His name is one not known by the majority of the American people, but John P. O’Neill knew more about Tim Osman (Osama bin Laden) than any other person in the world. He became the FBI’s counterterrorism chief in 1995 and quickly rose through the ranks. Because of his unorthodox investigative methods and a tendency to go against protocol, it didn’t take long for John O’Neill to come into direct conflict with his superiors. The FBI higher-ups continuously blocked O’Neill from digging deeper into the ‘Al-Qaeda’ network, starting with the bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia (34). It is of extreme significance to note that the Zionist entity typically and erroneously blamed the attack on Khobar Towers on Hezbollah, the Lebanese resistance movement. The same type of military-grade explosives used in the truck bomb at Khobar Towers, was used in the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon and the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. These two incidents were also blamed on Hezbollah by the usurping Zionist regime. The Marine barracks bombing has now been linked to Israel by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky (35); the assassination of Hariri has been extensively exposed as an Israeli operation, by Hezbollah Secretary General, his eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (36).
After the bombings of the US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which are now also linked to CIA and Mossad (37), John O’Neill was eager to be involved in the investigation due to the so-called ‘Al-Qaeda’ fingerprints on the attack. The ‘superiors’ in Washington had a severe dislike for O’Neill, however, and the New York FBI office where O’Neill worked was left out of the loop. This jaded O’Neill even further, and in October of 2000, the beginning of the end came for O’Neill when he came into conflict with Zionist Ambassador Barbara Bodine over the USS Cole bombing. O’Neill suspected that the truth of the matter was larger than he had ever imagined, and that ‘Al-Qaeda’ may not have been the main culprit (38). Bodine received her orders to undermine O’Neill’s team from Zionist Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, the fervent defender of the genocidal sanctions against Iraq. A former CIA agent echoed O’Neill’s suspicions when he said O’Neill and his team were kicked out of Yemen because they were getting close to uncovering that the US Navy ship wasn’t bombed by ‘Al-Qaeda’, but by an Israeli cruise missile launched from a Zionist Dolphin-class submarine (39). O’Neill would return home to the United States frustrated, 20 pounds lighter, and in doubt of his future in the intelligence community. He continued investigating the USS Cole bombing, but was ordered to cease and desist when the FBI pulled out of Yemen.
Less than a month before the September 11th attacks, John O’Neill was forced to step down from his position as counterterrorism chief of the FBI, due to pressure from the Bush Administration and a smear campaign from his FBI bosses (40). He was approached by Zionist Jerome Hauer of Kroll Inc., founded by Zionist Jules B. Kroll, immediately after he reluctantly resigned from the FBI. Kroll had gained control of the World Trade Center’s security after the 1993 false flag attack, and it became a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies and AIG, owned by aforementioned Zionist 9/11 accomplice Maurice Greenberg, and later his son Jeffrey Greenberg. The family of Jerome Hauer had deep Zionist fundraising roots in New York’s Jewish community, and Hauer himself was very close with Larry Silverstein. Hauer was responsible for placing the Office of Emergency Management inside Building 7, much to the dismay of the NYPD. Classified information linking the CIA and the Zionist companies that profited from insider trading were located in this office (41).
The younger brother of George W. Bush, Marvin Bush, was a director from 1993 until 2000 of the other firm with a security contract for the Twin Towers, called Securacom, later known as Stratesec. A year before Bush stepped down, his cousin Wirt D. Walker III became Stratesec CEO (42). Kroll and Securacom were behind the mysterious power-down the weekend prior to 9/11, where masked men entered the Towers with excessively large amounts of wire that they claimed would be used for rerouting internet cables (43). Though Larry Silverstein had breakfast in the Windows on the World restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower every morning (44), he was conveniently absent that fateful morning. Jerome Hauer, Maurice Greenberg and his son, Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker, Jules Kroll, Frank Lowy, Ronald Lauder, and several other key Zionist assets in the Mossad operation were not present in the World Trade Center on 9/11. John O’Neill, however, went to work like it was a regular day. The former FBI counterterrorism chief died in the World Trade Center. Due to the affiliations of the Zionist personalities involved in smearing him and hiring him as a consultant with Kroll, it would appear O’Neill was murdered.
Re-enter Zakheim and Lauder
Israel is the pioneer of drone technology like remote-controlled planes and armored assault vehicles, and has made billions off of video-game-style murder in occupied Palestine, occupied Kashmir, occupied Iraq, and Lebanon (45). Remote-controlled vehicles are not something out of a sci-fi film – they are an everyday reality, being used by oppressive regimes worldwide to terrorize civilian populations. Rabbi Dov Zakheim, the owner of a company that produced such technology, was also Pentagon comptroller from 2001-2004. Zakheim was in charge of the Department of Defense’s flow of money, and on the day before 9/11/01, war criminal Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion had vanished. By the time Zakheim stepped down, another trillion dollars had gone missing, totaling $3.3 trillion that seemingly couldn’t be accounted for. But when the Zionist entity received a weapons package in the form of a military surplus from Bush’s neoconservative Zionist administration, including a fleet of F-16 and F-15 fighter jets, it was none other than Zakheim who negotiated the deal. These new planes would be used in brutal Israeli genocides inflicted against Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09 (46).
The name of Zakheim’s aforesaid company is System Planning Corporation (SPC), a defense contractor that specialized in new age warfare, and specifically, the implementation of remote-control software into military aircraft. SPC manufactures a Flight Termination System (FTS) equipped with long-range transmitters, which allows a flight to be hijacked and controlled at any time. Shortly before 9/11, Zakheim’s SPC contracted with an air force base in Florida to test the FTS on at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of a tanker deal between Boeing and the Pentagon. Boeing, according to an overview on its website, has had a working relationship with the Zionist entity for over 60 years. Zakheim’s company reformatted the planes with several key parts; it is crucial to note that Flight 175, which struck the South Tower, and Flight 11, which struck the North Tower, were both 767s. [AD: More likely, it was drone replacements for Flight 11 and Flight 175 that struck, respectively, the North Tower and the South Tower. Numerous eyewitnesses and live media reports stated that the second plane looked to be about the size of a 737 (smaller than a 767); some stated that it looked like a military refueling tanker.] In photos of Flight 175 approaching the South Tower, there is an object under the fuselage that closely resembles SPC’s FTS. Comparing photos of Flight 175 with tankers on SPC’s website, it is impossible to ignore the likelihood that the airliners were actually Zakheim’s refitted, reformatted Pentagon–Boeing tankers (47).
Ronald Lauder, the chairman of the New York State Commission on Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization, wrote a book in 1992 called Privatization for New York: Competing for a Better Future. In 1994, Zionist Lauder suggested to New York Governor George Pataki, to whom he had given excessive donations (48), that privatizing airports would bring in huge revenue for New York. Pataki, intrigued by the idea, commissioned Lauder to bring his ambitious proposal to life. Lauder had his sights set on Stewart Airport in Newburgh, New York. On March 31st, 2000, Lauder vaunted that New York became the first state in the nation to privatize a commercial airport, awarding the contract to UK-based National Express Group, which at the time was owned by Zionist William Rollason (49). Stewart Airport is where the paths of Flight 175 and Flight 11 oddly and chillingly converged on 9/11 (50).
No Arab names on the passenger lists. The suicide hijackers turning up alive. The erratic flight paths of the airliners, that became frighteningly precise before impact. The so-called hijackers who were exceptionally poor pilots, though described as excellent by the Zionist media (51). Rabbi Zakheim’s corporation that produces a Flight Termination System, along with the strange events surrounding him immediately before and after 9/11. Flight 11 flying directly into the secure computer room in the North Tower of Marsh & McLennan Companies/Kroll, the company of Zionist partners Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg (52). Mass murderer Netanyahu, who was in New York City on 9/11, stating that the attacks benefited Israel and swung American opinion in favor of the Zionist entity (53). Dulles, Newark, and Logan airport security being controlled by a single Israeli company, ICTS/Huntleigh, owned by former Shin Bet agents Menachem Atzmon and Ezra Harel. ICTS never being questioned by the 9/11 Commission (54). Ronald Lauder’s privatization exploits. When a coincidence turns into a string of coincidences, it ceases to be a string of coincidences, and it becomes a pattern. In the case of 9/11, there is an undeniable pattern of criminal Zionist involvement.
Cartoon: Amos Biderman, Haaretz
Michael Chertoff: Savior of the Israeli Spy Ring
One of the more telling anomalies on September 11th was the seismic spikes recorded by Columbia University’s Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory just prior to the collapse of the Twin Towers (55). Combine this with the hundreds of eyewitness accounts (many of them by New York firefighters) that state they heard explosions resembling bombs detonating before the collapse of the Towers (56), in addition to the pools of molten metal found in the footprint of where the Towers once stood, burning at temperatures that jet fuel at its hottest cannot produce (57), and there is convincing, corroborated evidence that a controlled demolition is the cause of the World Trade Center collapse. In an investigative report by Carl Cameron of Fox News, 60 Israeli spies in the fields of military intelligence and explosive ordnance were detained on 9/11, and more than 140 Israeli spies were detained shortly before the events (58).
The spies detained on that day tested positive for explosives, including the ill-famed five dancing Israelis who claimed to be in New York to “document the event”. They were pulled over on the George Washington Bridge by the FBI, and their van tested positive for explosives as well (59). Their names were Yaron Shmuel, Omer Marmari, Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, and Oded Ellner. They worked for a counterfeit moving company named Urban Moving Systems, owned by Israeli Dominick Otto Suter. Once federal agents apprehended the dancing Israelis, they returned to the offices of Urban Moving Systems to interrogate Suter, but he had already departed. These men were discovered to be Mossad agents, and the moving company was a Mossad front to gather intelligence on various Arab organizations in the tri-state area (60).
The large majority of the Israeli spies were posing as art students, an ancient Israeli spying technique started by early asset to the false flag of 9/11, Mossad spymaster Peter Zvi Malkin (61). Many of them were also employees of Amdocs, an Israeli company founded by Zionist criminal Morris Kahn, which collects processing data for 90% of the phone calls, emails, and text messages in America, including several agencies of the federal government; as well as Comverse Technology, headed by Zionist Kobi Alexander, which provides wiretapping technology for many law enforcement agencies across the US (62). On September 4, 2001, Zim Integrated Shipping Services, partially owned by the Israeli government, paid $50,000 to break its lease and move its headquarters to Norfolk, Virginia. Zim’s officials were never questioned regarding what prompted them to move a week before the most devastating ‘terror attack’ on American soil in history (63).
Four thousand Israelis were warned via text message of impending attacks in the New York area by Zionist company Odigo, founded by Israeli husband and wife, Avner and Maskit Ronen. Only three months after 9/11, the Ronen partners negotiated a deal with Kobi Alexander’s Comverse, which already had a partial stake in Odigo, to be fully bought out (64). Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer, along with fellow Comverse executives William Sorin and David Kreinberg, both of whom served in Israeli intelligence with Alexander, were on the run from US prosecutors after they were brought up on charges of securities, wire, and mail fraud. In 2006, they were strangely allowed to leave the US, despite several warrants for their arrest. They hid all over the world, including Sri Lanka and Namibia, before being apprehended (65).
The reason for the poor investigation of these anomalous occurrences (or the lack of investigation, for that matter), despite all of these personalities and corporations being deeply connected to the Zionist entity, is one man: Zionist Michael Chertoff. Chertoff, a dual citizen of the illegal Zionist state, like most of the criminals connected to the plot on 9/11, is the son of impassioned Zionists. His father, Rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff, was the last in a long line of a family of Talmudic rabbis from Russia; his mother, Livia Eisen, was the first hostess of El Al, and one of the earliest Mossad operatives, working under the aforementioned Isser Harel. Chertoff’s mother was instrumental in Operation Magic Carpet, which brought Jewish families from Yemen into Israel for cheap labor. Due to the malicious anti-Arab sentiment of Zionism, the Zionist leadership felt the need to de-Arabize the Yemeni Jews, and authorized the kidnaping of Yemeni babies to then be delivered to European parents to strip them of their culture and their ethnic roots (66). Michael Chertoff’s wife, Meryl, is a chairwoman of an ADL of B’nai B’rith regional organization in New Jersey.
Prior to becoming the second Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff was chief of the criminal division of the Justice Department from 2001-2003. It was Chertoff who blocked the efforts of several agents across the FBI’s ranks to investigate the hundreds of Mossad spies detained in connection with the attacks on 9/11. He also supervised the confiscation and destruction of evidence that would have linked Israel and the US to the attacks, such as videotapes, eyewitness accounts, written testimonies, and debris from Ground Zero. Within months, all of the Israelis in custody were released, with no coverage from the Zionist media and no objection from Bush’s government. Though Chertoff had no problem using torture while interrogating foreign nationals (67), these Israeli spies were subjected to no such action, and upon their release, were quietly sent back to the terror state of Israel (68). To finalize the cover-up and take the public’s attention off of the Israeli spy ring, Zionist Chertoff orchestrated the capture of 1,100 Muslim citizens, tourists, and immigrants, falsely labeling them as suspects connected to the September 11th attacks. These innocent people were physically abused in secret facilities, denied the right to legal counsel, psychologically abused in secret military tribunals before they were deported, or released back into society after these criminal acts were committed against them. Chertoff was also the primary author of the Patriot Act, an Orwellian piece of legislation written months before 9/11, and signed into law on October 26, 2001 (69).
A New Analysis
An operation 20 years in the making, the attacks of September 11th in New York City and Washington D.C. were a false flag carried out by the Mossad; its close-knit network of wealthy sayanim (70); and criminal elements within the Bush Administration, the FBI, and the CIA, with dual loyalty to the genocidal state of Israel. Through espionage, privatization, and infiltration, this Zionist criminal network gained control of the World Trade Center, its security, as well as several government communications outlets which were subverted once the terror operation commenced. Using flight termination system technology in remote-controlled tanker jets, and nano-thermate/thermite charges strategically placed in the Twin Towers and Building 7 by its experts in military intelligence and explosive ordnance, the criminal network brought down the World Trade Center by controlled demolition.
Using the Zionist media to incite fear and hysteria amongst the public through disinformation, the criminal network successfully covered up the Zionist regime’s mass murder in Occupied Palestine during the height of the Second Intifada. With the mission accomplished, and the public totally programmed and petrified of the unknown, the criminal network advanced with the next phase of its PNAC agenda: expanding executive power in America through totalitarian legislation, and securing Israel through multiple regional wars. To complete the cover-up of the attacks, the criminal network used its sayanim in NIST and the 9/11 Commission, as well as top sayan (singular form of sayanim) Michael Chertoff, to obliterate proofs of Israeli–US involvement and to perpetuate the lies already enforced by the media. For the families of the 2,973 innocents that died in the attacks, the criminal network employed its agent, the Zionist Kenneth Feinberg, to set up the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund. Under Feinberg’s sinister direction, each family received an average of $1.25 million, but they waived their right to sue the government for criminal negligence (71).
The criminal network used the Zionist media to dub its war the ‘War on Terror’, taking a page right out of Benjamin Netanyahu’s book Terrorism: How the West Can Win, published in 1986 (72). This would allow the criminal network to extend its occupations abroad indefinitely, since the enemy had never been clearly identified. With American troops conducting genocidal operations in Afghanistan, the Patriot Act was passed and the Department of Homeland Security was created, granting immeasurable governing power to the Zionist administration; the involvement of Israel and America in the attacks was silenced, and the next destruction of a nation was planned for Iraq. The criminal network slowly disbanded, eventually finding their way back to the Zionist entity, or fading into obscurity elsewhere like Michael Chertoff’s cousin Benjamin Chertoff, who aided the criminal network by smearing the campaign for 9/11 truth (73). On a secondary, but still vitally important level, the Zionist criminal network, specifically the Mossad and the CIA, strengthened its hegemonic domination of the world even further by profiting enormously from reorganizing and taking full control of the lucrative heroin trade in Afghanistan and setting up business operations to take control of the neighboring oil fields in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan (74).
Scholars like Noam Chomsky and the late Howard Zinn have suggested that the 9/11 events are “in the past”, and that seeking the truth as to who perpetrated the attacks “doesn’t have any significance” (75). If your family was murdered, would you think their deaths were in the past, and that identifying the murderer or murderers wouldn’t have any significance? Their position is ridiculous at best and collusive at worst. 9/11 is the reason over one million civlians have been murdered in the last 9 years in Occupied Afghanistan. 9/11 is the reason 1.5 million innocents in Occupied Iraq have been slaughtered. It is the reason for increased billion-dollar aid packages to Israel and increases in brutality by the Zionist entity in Occupied Palestine. It is the reason behind full US support and encouragement of the Zionist aggression used against Lebanon in 2006, which resulted in the genocide of over 1,200 Lebanese civilians. It is the reason for drone attacks in Pakistan, which murder civilians daily. It is the reason for covert wars, which are slowly becoming genocides, in Yemen and Somalia. It is the reason for every future act of aggression, all to be waged on the basis of the ‘War on Terror’. Investigating the criminals behind 9/11 isn’t just significant – it is ESSENTIAL to the worldwide pursuit of truth, peace, justice, and freedom.
9/11 was not blowback. 9/11 was not done by Al-Qaeda, an organization which doesn’t even exist (76). 9/11 was a Mossad–CIA intelligence operation, and the evidence exposed here is only the tip of the iceberg. Journalists and activists like Christopher Bollyn, Wayne Madsen, Jerry Mazza, academic Joel Kovel, and Freedom Flotilla activist Kenneth O’Keefe have all exposed Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks, but there need to be more efforts like those put forth by these brave men. Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, former head of Pakistan’s ISI Hamid Gul, and former Director of Studies at the Army War College Alan Sabrosky have also gone on record stating Mossad was behind 9/11 (77). War criminal Barack Obama’s new Regulation Czar, Zionist Cass Sunstein, has said that 9/11 truth groups need to be infiltrated because they pose a threat to the government’s ‘anti-terrorism’ policies (78). That means seeking 9/11 truth is hurting the occupiers, oppressors, murderers, thieves, and financial gangsters that have turned the poor and downtrodden masses into their slaves. It means that the truth is winning.
It is the duty of every activist, journalist, and scholar fighting to end tyranny in the occupied nations of the Middle East to investigate, discuss, and expose 9/11 due to its being the pretext from which the fight to end tyranny stems. Once the people of the world know the pretext was a lie, they will know everything that followed it was a lie too. They will know that Muslims, Arabs, and Islam itself aren’t the enemy; but that the enemy is a US–Zionist alliance that has sat at the top of the world’s power structure through a reign of terror for what seems like the duration. With this newfound knowledge, the people will then unite in truth and revolution, and the Zionist criminal network that orchestrated 9/11 will be eliminated once and for all.
~ The End ~
(1) Is America in Bible Prophecy? by Michael D. Evans, interviewed by Deborah Caldwell
(2) Targeted Killings – A Retro Fashion Very Much in Vogue by Yossi Melman; Israel’s Secret Wars by Benny Morris and Ian Black
(3) Isser Harel: Obituary by Eric Silver
(4) The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
(5) Who Bombed the World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed by Paul DiRienzo, Frank Morales, and Chris Flash
(6) Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9/11 Hijackers by Michael Collins Piper
(7) Dov Zakheim retires from Booz Allen Hamilton by Jerry Mazza
(8) The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper
(9) The “New World Order” by B.W. Holmes
(10) Fifty questions on 9/11 by Pepe Escobar
(11) Hijack Suspects Alive and Well by BBC News; Stranger than Fiction by Dr. Albert D. Pastore, PhD.
(12) Report: Bin Laden Already Dead by Fox News; Israeli Intelligence: Bin Laden Is Dead, Heir Has Been Chosen by World Tribune
(13) When Osama Bin Laden Was Tim Osman by J. Orlin Grabbe; The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin; Report: Bin Laden Treated at US Hospital by Elizabeth Bryant
(14) Mossad Agent Pearlman Releases Phony “Al-Qaeda Tape” by Paul Joseph Watson
(15) Is Israel Controlling Phony Terror News? by Gordon Duff and Brian Jobert
(16) Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11 by Aaron Dykes
(17) Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert
(18) How Mossad Deceived the US Military on 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
(19) UAL Flight 93 Landed Safely at Cleveland Hopkins Airport by Channel 9 News Staff of Cleveland
(20) Pentagon Eyewitness: Official 9/11 Legend Exposed by Christopher Bollyn
(21) BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job by Jacob Hamblin
(22) The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions by David Ray Griffin
(23) The Republican Jewish Coalition and the pro-Israel Lobby by Bob Feldman; The World Trade Center Deal Remains in Doubt by Charles V. Bagli; Silverstein Recovers: Dark Horse May Win World Trade Center by Andrew Rice
(24) Green Acres: George Pataki, Ronald Lauder and the Politics of New Beginnings by The New York Press
(25) Silverstein Incriminates 9-11 WTC Lies by Dick Eastman; Up in Smoke by Sara Leibovich-Dar
(26) Insurers Debate: One Accident or Two by Bloomberg News
(27) As Judge Leaves for Law Firm, His Legacy Is Remembered by Joseph Goldstein
(28) Bush Nominates Zionist Judge Involved in Key 9-11 Judgements to Serve as U.S. Attorney General by Christopher Bollyn
(29) Israeli Investors Made Huge Profits From 9/11 Event by Walter Storch; Suspicious Trading Points to Advance Knowledge by Big Investors of September 11th Attacks by Barry Grey
(30) World Trade Center Scrap Sails for India, China by Reuters; WTC Steel to Rise Again in Indian Buildings by Reuters
(31) In Israel, Bloomberg Shows His Support by Dina Kraft
(32) Loot the US Treasury by Tom Heneghan
(33) NIST’s Fraudulent “Final Report on the Collapse of WTC 7”: A Criminal Fraud at Taxpayer Expense by Christopher Bollyn
(34) Investigating Khobar Towers: How a Saudi Deception Protected Bin Laden by Gareth Porter
(35) By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer by Victor Ostrovsky and Clair Hoy
(36) Sayyed Nasrallah: Israel Behind Hariri’s Assassination by Hussein Assi, Al Manar
(37) Questions Mount in Kenya, Tanzania Bombings by Martin McLaughlin
(38) Who Killed 9/11 Hero John O’Neill? by The Daily Brew
(39) Clearing the Baffles for 9/11 by Wayne Madsen
(40) Who Killed John O’Neill? (documentary) by Ryan Thurston (writer) and Ty Rauber (producer and director)
(41) Who Is Jerome Hauer? by Christopher Bollyn; Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks by Michael C. Ruppert
(42) Secrecy Surrounds 9/11 Investigation by Craig Cox
(43) ‘Power Down’ Condition at the WTC on the Weekend Preceding 9/11 by Scott Forbes; 9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush by What Really Happened?
(44) The Weekend Interview with Larry Silverstein: Rebuilding Ground Zero by Steven Malanga
(45) Drones and Death: The Israeli Connection by Ed Kinane; Israel Paves the Way for Remote Control Killing by Jonathan Cook
(46) Following Zakheim and Pentagon Trillions to Israel by Jerry Mazza
(47) The Mastermind Behind 9/11? by Stephen St. John
(48) Pataki’s Favorite Conservatives by Wayne Barrett
(49) Governor Pataki Hands Stewart Airport Keys to National Express by New York State Department of Transportation Office of Media Relations
(50) 9-11: Animation Showing Military Precision of Flight Paths by Looking Glass News
(51) Operation 9/11: No Suicide Pilots by Carol A. Valentine
(52) The Fleecing of America: 9/11 and the Crisis on Wall Street by Christopher Bollyn
(53) Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel by Haaretz and Reuters
(54) More Questions on 9/11 by Pepe Escobar; All the 9/11 Airports Serviced by One Israeli Owned Company by What Really Happened?
(55) 9/11 Seismic Data Refutes Official Explanation by Christopher Bollyn
(56) The September 11th Records by The New York Times
(57) Me, Art Bell, and 9/11 by Lisa Giuliani
(58) Carl Cameron Investigates Parts 1-4: Israel Is Spying In and On the U.S. by Fox News
(59) Mossad – The Israeli Connection to 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
(60) Five Israelis Were Seen Filming as Jet Liners Ploughed Into the Twin Towers by Neil Mackay
(61) Peter Zvi Malkin, Israeli Agent Who Captured Adolf Eichmann, Dies by Margalit Fox
(62) An Enigma: Vast Israeli Spy Network Dismantled in the US by Sylvain Cypel, translated by Malcolm Garris
(63) Profile: Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. by History Commons
(64) Why Was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee: The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn; Myth-Debunking Snopes Obscures Israel’s Role in 9/11 by Maidhc Ó Cathail
(65) Former Comverse Chief Alexander Arrested in Namibia by Allan Dodds Frank and Bob Van Voris
(66) The Missing Yemenite Children by Doron A. Tal
(67) Chertoff OKs Torture: Bizarre Choice for Homeland Czar Deep in Scandal by James P. Tucker
(68) Controlled Press Conceals Chertoff’s Israeli Roots by Christopher Bollyn
(69) Failing Upwards: The Rise of Michael Chertoff by Mike Whitney
(70) Sayanim – Israeli Operatives in the U.S. by Jeff Gates
(71) From Agent Orange, to 9/11, to BP: Kenneth Feinberg Is Master of Disaster by Sander Hicks
(72) How (Not) to Win by Christopher Dickey
(73) 9/11 and Chertoff: Cousin Wrote 9/11 Propaganda for Popular Mechanics by Christopher Bollyn
(74) Military Escalation: From Afghanistan to the Caspian Sea and Central Asia by Rick Rozoff; Intel Expert Says 9-11 Looks Like a Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn
(75) An Open Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn by Atheo
(76) Al-Qaeda Is Fiction: The Organization Doesn’t Exist by Mark Perkel
(77) Ex-Italy Pres – 9-11 Was CIA/Mossad Operation by the staff of American Free Press; Ex-ISI Chief Gul Exposes 9/11 Inside Job by Paul Joseph Watson; Sabrosky Interview Ties Israel to 9/11 by Gordon Duff
(78) Obama Staffer Wants ‘Cognitive Infiltration’ of 9/11 Truth Groups by Daniel Tencer
The counterfeit hoopla surrounding the Charlie Hebdo ‘free speech’ saga was further undermined this week when a prominent British vicar posted an article on Facebook linking Israel to the 9/11 attacks, for which he is now ‘under investigation’.
The Rev. Dr. Stephen Sizer
Stephen Sizer, a well-known reverend of Christ Church, Virginia Water, posted the WikiSpooks article “9/11: Israel Did It” on Facebook and subsequently asked, “Is this [research] anti-Semitic?”
“It raises so many questions,” he added.
Sizer eventually removed the post under mounting pressure from his diocese and Britain’s Jewish lobby, but affirmed his right to freedom of speech and inquiry.
“It is essential the public become convinced of what happened before and after 9/11,” Sizer toldJewish News Online. “Inevitably the truth will upset many people if it is shown by further investigation that the official explanations are shown to be deficient.” Suppressing discussion of Israel’s role in 9/11 will only “fuel suspicion”, the outspoken preacher stressed.
Stephen Robert Sizer is the incumbent of the Anglican parish of Christ Church, Virginia Water, in Surrey, England.
Sizer is barking up the right tree, hence the frenzied reaction from Zionists and those under their sway.
Mainstream outlets such as the BBC, The Telegraph, the Daily Mirror, as well as a number of overt Zionist sources, piled on the principled man of God by running identical smear stories about this manufactured ‘scandal’. The articles in question emphasize that Sizer is ‘being investigated’ for the posting, as if it is a crime to promote an article that calls attention to Israeli false-flag terrorism. The hit pieces also prominently quote a spokesman from the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a thuggish Zionist hate-gang who have attacked Sizer as an ‘anti-Semite’ on numerous occasions. But none of the articles, or the Israeli fifth columnists they champion, addresses the evidence of Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
Israel’s fingerprints do indeed appear to be all over the events of 9/11. And judging by the Zionist state’s past behaviour, it should not come as a surprise to learn that 9/11 was in some way organized by Israel’s secret agencies, who have on plenty of previous occasions executed false-flag attacks aimed at framing their Arab/Muslim adversaries, thereby inducing adverse reactions from the West towards their foes.
Menachem Begin was leader of the Jewish ‘Irgun Zvai Leumi’ terrorist gang, which blew up the British High Commission in Jerusalem in 1946, killing 91 people including 15 Jews. Begin became Prime Minister of Israel.
“Wanted” poster of the Palestine Police Force offering rewards for the capture of Stern Gang members: (L) Jaacov Levstein (Eliav), Yitzhak Yezernitzky (Yitzhak Shamir), and Natan Friedman-Yelin. Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel.
A History of Deception
At the time, Israel’s founding fathers were some of the most brutal terrorists around. Two former Israeli prime ministers, Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin, were leaders of Jewish terrorist militias which waged a merciless insurgency against the indigenous Arabs of Palestine and also against the British colonial administrators of the land in the 1940s. Benjamin Netanyahu’s father, Benzion Netanyahu, was the personal secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the brains behind the bellicose ‘Revisionist’ fold within the Zionist movement which formulated the ideological framework of the Zionist militant groups who eventually besieged Palestine, destroying more than 500 Arab villages and driving out a minimum of 750,000 Palestinians in a matter of two years, from 1946 to 1948.
In 1946, two years before Israel became a state, Irgun assailants carried out an attack on the King David Hotel, which housed Britain’s administrative headquarters in the Mandate of Palestine. Jewish militants under the direction of Begin disguised themselves as Arabs and planted a number of bombs hidden in milk crates in the hotel’s basement, then detonated them, causing a huge explosion which leveled a good chunk of the building. Ninety-one people were killed in the blast, including dozens of British personnel. “I’m glad to have been a terrorist for liberation,” said one Jewish Irgunist in a BBC documentary about the bombing. “We didn’t mind being called terrorists then,” another former Irgun militant confessed.
July 22, 1946: Irgun militants bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing 91 people.
A competing Zionist terrorist faction, the Stern Gang (also known as Lehi), assassinated British soldiers as well as multiple foreign diplomats and mediators such as Sweden’s Count Folke Bernadotte. That group, originally headed by the Jewish supremacist Avraham Stern, even proposed a military alliance with Nazi Germany in 1941, viewing Britain as a greater roadblock to a Jewish ethno-state in Palestine than Hitler’s regime, which was quite happy to expedite the resettlement of Germany’s Jews to the Middle East.
Fast-forward to 1954: Israel again initiates a false-flag conspiracy in the region, this time in Egypt. A terrorist cell of Zionist mercenaries was discovered in Cairo and Alexandria after they tried and failed to detonate incendiary devices in British and American installations. The Israeli operatives were discovered after one of the conspirators prematurely discharged an incendiary device in his pocket, leading to his arrest and the capture of the whole cabal. The Israeli terrorists later confessed to Egyptian authorities that the provocation was planned, organized, and directed by Tel Aviv. The operation was intended to stymie a burgeoning British–American–Egyptian rapport and derail ongoing negotiations between Egypt and Britain which would have seen the British relinquish control of the Suez Canal, much to Israel’s displeasure. It was later dubbed the “Lavon Affair“.
Analyst Richard H. Curtiss, writing in a 1992 article for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, observed that Israel had in the works an identical subterfuge against Jordan the same year, wherein Israeli intelligence “conceived a plan to attack British personnel seconded to King Hussein’s government in Jordan”. “The purpose,” Curtiss explained, “was to sour relations between Britain and Jordan [as well as turn] both Jordan and Britain [against] Egypt, which would be blamed for such attacks.” Curtiss cited a 1979 book, The Untold History of Israel, by Israeli journalists Jacques Derogy and Hesi Carmel, which related the story.
The Lavon Affair was not the first, nor would it be the last Israeli covert operation aimed at framing Arabs for terrorism against the West. In 1967, during the Six-Day War between Israel and several Arab states, the Israeli military attacked an American surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters. Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats besieged the vessel for hours, even shooting holes in the large American flag billowing in the wind. Having scoped out the ship hours beforehand, the Israelis were well aware it was American. As a result of Israel’s heinous attack, more than 200 American sailors were dead or wounded. The motive of the blitz was to sink the Liberty, thereby preventing it from relaying messages back to Washington which could have scuttled Israeli plans to seize land from Egypt and Syria during the six-day conflict. If the ship had been successfully destroyed, Israel would have most likely attributed the attack to its Arab foes. The Israelis later captured the Sinai and Golan Heights from Egypt and Syria respectively. Unfortunately for the Israelis, the Liberty did not sink, and survivors revealed Israel’s hand behind the attack.
June 8, 1967: Israeli air and naval forces savagely attack the USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding 174.
Severely damaged USS Liberty at pierside, Valletta, Malta.
USS Liberty torpedo hole, photographed in dry dock.
In his books By Way of Deception and The Other Side of Deception, former Mossad katsa Victor Ostrovsky revealed a litany of Israeli covert operations. One clear example of Israeli chicanery that Ostrovsky exposed was a 1986 plot code-named ‘Operation Trojan’, which saw Mossad agents plant a transponder device on Libyan soil that relayed false coded messages, making it look like the Libyan government was coordinating terrorists from their embassies worldwide to attack American targets. Simultaneously, a bomb explosion rocked a Berlin nightclub frequented by US military personnel, killing two US servicemen. The Mossad deception successfully coerced a hoodwinked US President Ronald Reagan into launching air strikes on Libya; Reagan cited the fake ‘terrorist’ transmissions emanating from a Mossad device as proof of Libyan culpability in the nightclub attack.
Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky
The Israelis are also implicated in the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. An investigative report on the World Socialist Web Site, entitled “Questions mount in Kenya, Tanzania bombings”, detailed US/Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks. The article, authored by Martin McLaughlin, cites reports from ABC News and Haaretz which affirmed that Israeli intelligence elements caused US officials to ignore warnings of an imminent attack against the embassies. US intelligence officials looked to their Israeli colleagues to diagnose the reliability of various warnings of looming danger, but the Israelis insisted they weren’t serious, resulting in no precautions being taken to defend against an assault.
“Four months’ worth of tips and alert signals that the Nairobi embassy was facing a potential disastrous explosives attack were sent to Washington,” wrote Warren Hough in a report for the American newspaper The Spotlight. “But nothing was done to protect this poorly shielded facility because, on the standard operating procedure inaugurated in the Reagan era, the FBI had to turn to the Israelis for a definite evaluation of these early warnings.”
“Ignore them, it’s just another false alarm,” Mossad told their counterparts in the CIA. The imprudent Israeli advice, Hough explained in the aforesaid article, “was the key factor in persuading the U.S. to let its guard down, resulting in the loss of life of at least 250 victims including 11 Americans.”
American embassy bombings in Nairobi, Kenya (left) and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on August 7, 1998.
Israel didn’t seem to believe its own counsel. According to researcher Ralph Schoenman, the first soldiers at the scene of the crime in Kenya and Tanzania “were special units of the Israeli armed forces and high-level agents of the Mossad” who quickly “took control” of the bombed-out sites.
Israel’s penchant for coercing America to let its guard down indicates a more sinister fraud at work, beyond an equally damning ‘let it happen’ scenario.
September 11: Israel’s ‘Hanukkah Miracle’ & the Neocons’ ‘New Pearl Harbor’
Exploiting and outright manipulating fissures between the West and the Arab/Muslim world has been a key component of Israeli strategy from the outset. And it is this artificial divide, fostered by years of Zionist subterfuges and political scheming, that lies at the core of the agenda of those truly responsible for the 9/11 attacks, the primordial affair which kick-started the bogus ‘war on terror’ and endless American war-making in the Middle East.
In a September 2001 interview with the Pakistani newspaper Ummat, Osama bin Laden denied responsibility for the attacks, articulating that the real architects of 9/11 are “persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive”. The “civilization, nation, country, or ideology” bin Laden spoke of that prospered the most from 9/11 is undoubtedly Zionism as an ideology and Israel as a country. Israel’s pugnacious leaders made that fact abundantly clear in cavalier public statements made shortly after the disaster.
The 9/11 attacks were “good for Israel” and had the effect of “[shifting] American public opinion in our favour”, announced a jubilant Benjamin Netanyahu on two separate occasions following the attacks, as quoted in Haaretz and other Israeli papers. According to Israeli journalist Aluf Benn, Ariel Sharon and his top military-intelligence advisors had proclaimed 9/11 a ‘Hanukkah miracle’ of good fortune for Israel, “coming just as Israel was under increasing international pressure because of the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians”. The assault on the Twin Towers “placed Israel firmly on the right side of the strategic map with the U.S., and put the Arab world at a disadvantage”, Benn wrote in Haaretz. “That’s the impression left by the speeches given by Mossad chief Efraim Halevy and National Security Council chairman Maj. Gen. Uzi Dayan, at this week’s Herzliya conference on national security.”
“Since September 11, our leaders have been euphoric,” the former Israeli intelligence chief Ami Ayalon told France’s Le Monde newspaper. “With no more international pressures on Israel, they [the Israeli leadership] think, the way is open.” Ehud Sprinzak, a founding Dean at Israel’s Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, reiterated the expressions of relief and delight amongst the Zionist leadership, telling the Israeli press that 9/11 was the “most important public relations act ever committed in our favour”. On the day of 9/11, Zionist commentator and Stratfor director George Friedman expressed the view that “the big winner today, intended or not, is the state of Israel” because the attacks will foster a closer alliance between the US and Israel, as well as lead America into “a massive covert and overt war against” the Muslim world. Even Israel’s former Mossad chief, Efraim Halevy, told a Canadian journalist that “one of the immediate results of 9/11 was clearly a very severe backlash of international approbation of Islam in general” and that Israel “obviously benefitted” from America’s response to the atrocity.
Years before 9/11, Zionists and neocons formed a number of think tanks to promote their militarist agenda in the Middle East. The most prominent one was called Project for the New American Century (PNAC), and was headed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan, two of Israel’s staunchest supporters in the US. In a September 2000 report entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses, the neocons pontificated about the need for “a new Pearl Harbor” to actualize their war plans against Middle Eastern regimes, particular that of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Four years earlier, in 1996, several prominent American neocons, notably Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser, authored a strategy paper for an Israeli think tank called the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000. In their paper titled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, the cadre of pro-Israel evangelists essentially called for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, which was an “important Israeli strategic objective” from their perspective. The ‘Clean Break’ authors stipulated that ousting Hussein was needed in order to ultimately weaken Syria, and they further expressed a desire to do away with the Iranian regime, Israel’s foremost military rival in the region.
In April 2002, PNAC neocons sought to capitalize on the 9/11 attacks to expedite their agenda of Iraq’s destruction, calling on President Bush in a written plea to “support Israel” in its “war on terrorism” by accelerating “plans for removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq”. Israeli citizens Perle, Feith, and Wurmser effectively put their wet dreams of war into practice by entering senior policy-making positions in the US administration of George W. Bush, leading the drive for the war in Iraq alongside the Israeli fifth columnist Paul Wolfowitz, who in turn was a high-ranking Pentagon official under Bush. Researchers fingered Feith’s Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon as the fountainhead of disinformation and propaganda about Iraq’s nonexistent ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’, a devious ploy also promoted in Neocon-Zionist literature throughout the 1990s.
And who devised the ‘war on terror’? Despite popular belief among leftists, that ominous philosophy’s birthplace was not in the dysfunctional brain of George W. Bush. Rather, it first emerged at the Jonathan Institute‘s Conference on International Terrorism held in 1979 in Jerusalem. That group was spearheaded by Israeli politicians of the Likudnik persuasion, principally Benjamin Netanyahu, who endeavoured to export their propagandistic memes about ‘terrorism’ to the West, hoping Western governments would do Israel’s bidding in the region. The foundry of lies and untruths sponsored by Netanyahu and his neocon minions in Washington was ultimately calculated to delegitimize Arab/Muslim resistance to Israeli imperial expansion and aggression, hence the widespread dissemination via Zionist-owned media venues of the erroneous contention that ‘Islamic terrorism’ is a unique threat facing the West. In actual fact, the biggest perpetrators and patrons of terrorist violence in the world are the Zionists, the Americans, and their allies.
Unsolved Mysteries and Unanswered Questions
Writing in his informative essay “The War on Iraq: Conceived in Israel”, Dr. Stephen Sniegoski asserts “the ‘war on terrorism’ was never intended to be a war to apprehend and punish the perpetrators of the September 11 atrocities. September 11 simply provided a pretext for government leaders to implement long-term policy plans.” Indeed, the ‘war on terror’ amounted to nothing less than a ‘war of terror’ against Israel’s opponents in the Middle East, with 9/11 serving as a very conveniently timed casus belli.
And what of Israel’s Mossad, that “ruthless and cunning” agency of terror that “has the capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act”, according to a group of US Army analysts? As the Army School of Advanced Military Studies acknowledged in the aforesaid study, Israel’s proclivity for ruthlessness and deception leads many to believe that 9/11 was yet another ‘false flag’ contrivance by the master manipulators in Tel Aviv.
What really happened on that fateful day?
There are many lingering questions about Israel’s role in the attacks. An oft-cited proof of Israeli involvement is the ‘five dancing Israelis’ incident, wherein a group of five individuals, later identified as Mossad agents by ABC News, the Jewish Forward, and FBI insiders, were seen by witnesses videotaping the disaster from a New Jersey rooftop, and subsequently cheering, laughing, and shouting with ‘joy and mockery’ as 3000 innocents were suffocating in the burning Twin Towers.
The ‘Five Dancing Israelis‘ (Omer Marmari, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, Sivan Kurzberg): as with Jules and Gédéon Naudet, “Our purpose was to document the event.”
The suspicious crew of Israelis were arrested on that day by the NYPD, and later questioned by the FBI about possible foreknowledge of the attacks. Considering they had shown up (with a video camera) in a very convenient spot at a very opportune time of the day, just as everything went down, and expressed outwardly signs of elation rather than fear and horror, it beggars belief to suggest they didn’t know exactly when, where, and how the assaults on the Twin Towers would come to pass.
In fact, FBI reports partially declassified in 2005 revealed that one of the arrested Israelis named Omer Marmari told authorities that he and his compatriots were acting in a celebratory manner because the attacks would help make the world “understand” Israel’s predicament vis-à-vis the Palestinians. “We’re Israelis. We’re not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem,” Israeli Sivan Kurzberg told the NYPD upon his arrest. While in custody, another of the five Israelis named Oded Ellner remarked, “the United States will [now] take steps to stop terrorism in the world”. How did any of them know for sure who did 9/11 before any investigation had been conducted, or how the US’s response to the attacks would benefit their country? Did they not only know when and where the attacks would occur, but also who would be blamed for them and the consequent direction of US foreign policy? That’s way more information than a group of self-professed ‘furniture movers‘ should be privy to.
The five Israeli suspects were eventually deported back to Israel without charge. In an article about the incident, journalist Christopher Ketcham quoted an anonymous CIA insider close to the investigation into the five Israelis who said “the decision to close down the investigation into the Israelis came from the White House” and that “it was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11”.
And what of those 200 Israelis that Fox News reported had been arrested shortly before and after 9/11, some of whom claimed to be ‘art students’ but were in actuality Mossad spies with expertise in eavesdropping and explosives? What of the mysterious ‘truck bomb’ or ‘explosive-laden van’ which was reported to have been ‘packed with explosives’ as it approached the George Washington Bridge? Why were the identities of the apprehended suspects never revealed to the public? Was it because they were Israelis and not Arabs? Is it just a coincidence that the Mossad passed along a very vague and dubious ‘warning’ to the CIA a few months before the attacks, suggesting that 200 ‘Arab terrorists’ were present on American soil and were planning a ‘major operation’? And is it not amazingly conspicuous that the Mossad linked this ‘imminent attack’ of which they had no specific information to ‘Osama bin Laden and Iraq’, as the UK’s Telegraphreported?
What about the ‘mural van’ that police stopped between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue on King Street near the World Trade Center on 9/11? Surely, a van with a painting depicting a plane crashing into the Twin Towers that was rented to ‘ethnic Middle Easterners’, according to a Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) report, is worthy of scrutiny. If the ‘ethnic Middle Easterners’ behind such an obvious display of foreknowledge were Arabs or Muslims, surely the Zionist-influenced mass media would have reported it, and surely the Zionist-influenced US government would have included it in official reports. But nary a mention of the incident can be found in media or government reports concerning the attacks.
How do we explain the mysterious acquisition of the entire World Trade Center complex by shady New York businessman Larry Silverstein six weeks before the attacks? The Jewish real estate magnate, who weirdly “felt a compelling urge” to own the worthless, asbestos-laden Twin Towers, happens to be a rabid Zionist with innumerable connections to Zionist lobbies, most notably the Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), under whose auspices the Zionist neocons produced the ‘Clean Break’ regime change manifesto. On top of that, Silverstein was a ‘personal friend’ of Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and Ariel Sharon, and had weekly conference calls with Netanyahu. Moreover, ‘Lucky Larry’ skipped out on a routine business meeting at the top of the North Tower (the first one hit) on 9/11, claiming a ‘miraculous’ intercession by his wife, who insisted he attend a ‘doctor’s appointment’ instead. Silverstein’s business partner on the murky WTC deal, Frank Lowy, is likewise an ardent Zionist Jew who fought in Israel’s ‘war of ethnic cleansing’ and chairs multiple pro-Israel think tanks in Israel itself, as well as in Australia where he acts as Tel Aviv’s pro bono ambassador.
And what of the lack of any credible evidence tying Arabs or Muslims to the attacks? What about the ‘indestructible passport’ of alleged hijacker Satam al-Suqami, which miraculously escaped the cabin of the exploded plane into the North Tower, falling hundreds of feet to the ground and emerging without so much as a blemish? Why even bring a passport on a domestic flight, let alone a suicide mission? What of the plethora of other eyebrow-raising FBI ‘discoveries’, such as the inexplicable Mohammed Atta luggage filled to the brim with incriminating ‘evidence’, including Atta’s ‘al-Qaeda plans’, Arabic-language flight training devices/videos, a Koran, etc. It is the height of credulity to believe that this luggage, which a former FBI agent toldNewsday amounted to the “Rosetta stone” of the investigation, conveniently did not get loaded onto the plane and fell right into the FBI’s lap. Does that not reek of a cheesy Hollywood stage-play for the gullible public’s consumption?
What about the markedly un-Islamic theatrics of the ’19 martyrs for Allah’ who were witnessed cavorting with strippers, taking drugs, and binge drinking in bars and clubs throughout Florida and Las Vegas, months before the attacks? Why would dedicated ‘jihadists’, who we are told obsessively observed Islamic laws and edicts, behave in this blasphemous way shortly before a ‘martyrdom operation’? Isn’t the obvious answer that these folks weren’t real Muslims, and were just pretending to be in order to create a phony ‘evidence trail’ for an equally bogus ‘al-Qaeda plot’?
Has it ever been sufficiently explained why several of the named ‘9/11 hijackers’ turned up alive and well in the Middle East, protesting their innocence, as the BBCreported? Could the fact that their passports had been lost and/or stolen in the years preceding the attacks indicate a frame-up at work? Are the CIA and Mossad not experts at stealing identities of innocent people for use in covert ops? Doesn’t Mossad have a ‘special unit’ for crafting fake passports to be used on foreign missions?
Has there ever been a credible explanation as to why most of the ’19 hijackers’ gained entry to America through a CIA ‘fast-tracking’ visa program run out of a US consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, as J. Michael Springmann revealed?
Can we explain how America’s multi-billion dollar military, intelligence, and defence apparatus, which consists of a dozen or so intelligence agencies and the most sophisticated defence and spy equipment and networks the world has ever seen, was astoundingly ‘asleep at the wheel’ and ‘unable to detect’ this plot and its rather clumsy progenitors? As the former Pakistani spy chief Hamid Gul mused with bewilderment, “a man living in a cave inside a mountain or a peasant’s hovel” was able to orchestrate 9/11 and thereby outfox the combined military might of America and its powerful allies? “I don’t believe it,” Gul retorted.
Has it ever been properly explained how shoddy pilots who never flew commercial aircraft in their lives were able to precision-guide three planes into their targets without a hiccup? How could a plane enter the Pentagon’s highly-protected and watched airspace without fighter jets intercepting it? Is it not odd that whoever was at the controls of Flight 77, or whatever actually hit the Pentagon, decided to not dive into the roof of the building, which would have been a much safer and easier-to-hit target than the façade? Is it just a coincidence that the very side of the building which was hit had just been ‘recently renovated’ with blast-walls and other upgrades, so that it could endure explosive impacts with minimal damage? Is it also mere happenstance that all of the Pentagon’s top brass, including Donald Rumsfeld, were on the opposite side of the building, safely out of harm’s way?
Can we explain how two giant skyscrapers can collapse to the ground at nearly free-fall speed, hurling hundred-ton chunks of steel structure hundreds of feet horizontally, simply from the impact of planes and a few scattered fires? Has there ever been a sufficient explanation as to how gravity can pulverize into dust large portions of two 110-story buildings? How did WTC Building 7 – the 47-story high-rise that was not hit by a plane – collapse neatly and symmetrically, like a controlled demolition, into its own footprint at free-fall speed? Does it not defy logic, common sense, and even basic laws of physics, that no explosives were involved in the gravity-defying collapses of these enormous structures?
These are merely a few of the hundreds of enduring questions that have haunted the US government and its apologists for years.
It is safe to say that satisfactory answers to these very valid and logical inquiries will not be forthcoming. Truth cannot prevail so long as the Neocon-Zionist clique, which usurped the Bush Administration and instigated the calamitous ‘war of civilizations’ by way of monstrous lies and deceit, is running the show in Washington and other epicentres of power that effectively dominate the world at the present time.
Sixty-five years ago, Japanese bombers launched an early morning surprise attack on the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor, killing some 2,400 seamen and bringing the United States into World War II. The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called December 7, 1941 “a date which will live in infamy” and asked Congress for a declaration of war against Japan. September 11, 2001 is another date which will live in infamy. Like the attack on Pearl Harbor, 9-11 was a surprise attack to most Americans – but not all.
Like the Japanese attack on the U.S. fleet, 9-11 was a catastrophic and transforming event that brought the United States into war, the so-called “War on Terror”. Unlike Pearl Harbor, however, 9-11 was not committed by an easily identifiable foe. Pronouncements by President George W. Bush and senior government officials notwithstanding, the solid evidence pinning the blame for the catastrophic terror attacks of 9-11 on 19 Arabs with box cutters has yet to be seen.
Despite the various government sponsored reports and commissions about the events of September 11, 2001, the attacks and the destruction they caused remain largely uninvestigated. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has not released the evidence it has to support the stated position of the government that 19 Arabs working with Al Qaida carried out these attacks on their own. To this day, the FBI has not even provided the physical evidence to identify the aircraft involved in the attacks, although there must be an adequate number of identifiable airplane parts from the four crash sites to do so. The FBI is clearly not interested in proving anything about 9-11 to the nation or the public.
WHO’S IN CONTROL?
So what’s going on? Why are the most catastrophic terror attacks in U.S. history uninvestigated, and why is the interpretation of the attacks left to the controlled media and politicians? Who has the power to control the media, the government, and the FBI, to conceal the truth about what really happened on 9-11? To understand who is really behind 9-11 requires a comprehensive investigation of the key players who played a role or who controlled the non-investigation and subsequent media-driven “interpretation” of the terror attacks.
Today, five years and three months after 9-11, we are able to look back at the people who have played these key roles. What we find is a small group of people who are linked in a global Zionist network – individuals who are connected by family, ethnic, and business ties to an organized network dedicated to supporting the state of Israel and its agenda.
By exposing the members of this Zionist network and their connection to 9-11 and the so-called “War on Terror”, we can identify the chief architects, sub-contractors, and workers who pulled off the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
Shortly after 9-11, I spoke with Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany’s domestic intelligence service, the Verfassungsschutz. He said that “the deathly precision” and “the magnitude of planning” behind the attacks would have required “years of planning”. Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the “fixed frame” of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a “loose group” of terrorists like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta. Many people would have been involved in the planning of such an operation, Werthebach said. The absence of leaks indicates that the attacks were “state-organized actions”, he said.
Andreas von Bülow, the former German parliamentarian, served on the commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service from 1969 to 1994. Von Bülow told me in the fall of 2001 that he believed that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, was behind the 9-11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending. “You don’t get the higher echelons,” von Bülow said, referring to the “architectural structure” which masterminds such terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion.
In a classic false-flag terror attack, the architectural level planners will use unwitting or corrupt “guns for hire” in order to have the blame assigned to the desired target. The terrorists who actually carry out the crimes are what von Bülow calls “the working level”, such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on Sept. 11. “The working level is part of the deception,” he said. “Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation,” von Bülow said. The deception is then widely propagated in the mainstream media, creating an accepted version of events. “Journalists don’t even raise the simplest questions,” he said. “Those who differ are labeled as crazy.”
“YEARS OF PLANNING”
The “years of planning” that Eckehardt Werthebach referred to are obvious to anyone who has read the real history of 9-11. The smaller false-flag terror attacks that preceded the catastrophic terror of 9-11 were meant to instill in the mind of the public the fear of a massive attack in the United States. The equally suspect and unproven bombings of the federal building in Oklahoma City and the first attack in the World Trade Center were meant to prepare public opinion for “the transforming event” of 9-11.
At the academic level, the architects of 9-11 have been working on U.S. public opinion since the mid-1980s to prepare the political and media elites for a catastrophic terror attack on American soil, and beyond that to focus on how the U.S. should respond to such an attack. Benjamin Netanyahu, the American-educated hard-line former prime minister of Israel, is probably the most conspicuous architect of terrorism and the so-called “War on Terror”. Netanyahu, a Jabotinsky Zionist of the right-wing Likud party, published a book in 1986 entitled Terrorism: How the West Can Win, in which he laid out precisely the blueprint for what has become the “War on Terror” in Iraq and Afghanistan. Netanyahu’s book, and its seriously flawed and racist thesis, has been rewritten, reprinted, and propagated ad nauseam.
Netanyahu’s thesis is that Israel is attacked by “terrorists” only because it is “western and democratic”, like European nations and the United States. For this reason, Netanyahu says, Americans and Europeans need to join the fight against those who are opposed to the Zionist state of Israel. In Netanyahu’s distorted view of the world, Palestinian grievances and their nationalist aspirations have no place or merit. Palestinians and Arabs are simply “terrorists”, he says, against whom the West should wage war, as we now do. Reading the controlled press or listening to the pundits on the U.S. mass media, it is clear that they have acted as agents of Zionist propaganda and should be held accountable for having snookered the United States into fighting costly and disastrous wars against Israel’s enemies.
There are other agents, many of them highly-placed Americans, who clearly and specifically pushed the agenda, which we now call the “War on Terror”, long before 9-11, as a response to a catastrophic terror attack. Three men authored an article in 1998 in Foreign Affairs, the bi-monthly publication of the Council on Foreign Relations, in which they laid out what changes would need to made within the U.S. government in the wake of “catastrophic terrorism”, which is also the title of the article.
The “Catastrophic Terrorism” article, written by Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, and Philip D. Zelikow, appeared in the last issue of Foreign Affairs in 1998. It begins with the strange subtitle “Imagining the Transforming Event”, as if what was actually desired by the authors was a transformation of the U.S. government and the way Americans live. The authors of the article, like Netanyahu, do not even mention the political causes of terrorism. Understanding the causes of terrorism in an effort to prevent it does not even occur to them. No, these three architects are busy “imagining the transforming event” – and how to respond to it.
This article is clearly an architectural-level document. It is meant to explain what should be done in the event of the catastrophic terror attack its authors are “imagining”. For this reason, the authors deserve to be investigated to see what kind of relationship they might have to those who carried out the false flag terror attacks of 9-11.
“LIKE PEARL HARBOR”
“Catastrophic terrorism has moved from far-fetched horror to a contingency that could happen next month,” the essay warns. “Although the United States still takes conventional terrorism seriously, it is not yet prepared for the new threat of catastrophic terrorism. The bombings in East Africa killed hundreds. A successful attack with weapons of mass destruction could certainly take thousands, or tens of thousands, of lives. If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently.”
With amazing prescience, the authors were right about all eight things they said “might” happen as a result of an attack of “catastrophic terrorism” like Pearl Harbor. The authors go on to recommend specifically what the U.S. government should do in the wake of such an event of “catastrophic terrorism”, which they concluded is “an eminent threat”.
• The U.S. government should have the authority to monitor any group and its potential state sponsors that might have the motive and the means to use weapons of mass destruction;
• The United States needs a new institution to gather intelligence on catastrophic terrorism – a National Terrorism Intelligence Center – that would collect and analyze information so it could warn of suspected catastrophic terrorist acts ahead of time;
• Washington must now work with other countries to extend the prohibitions against development or possession of weapons of mass destruction;
• International norms should adapt so that states are obliged to reassure other states that are worried and to take reasonable measures to prove they are not secretly developing weapons of mass destruction. Failure to supply such proof or to prosecute the criminals living within their borders should entitle worried nations to take all necessary actions for their self-defense;
• The United States should aspire as a long-term objective to identify every person and all freight entering the country;
• The United States should support a system to ensure that every country’s passports are computer readable, with every country’s passport control station linked to a database.
In the same issue of Foreign Affairs in which the prescient essay on “catastrophic terrorism” appeared, there is an essay about Osama Bin Laden’s “License to Kill”, by Bernard Lewis, the British Zionist mastermind of academia. After reading the Lewis article, in which he says Osama Bin Laden calls on Muslims to “kill the Americans and plunder their possessions wherever he finds them and whenever he can”, there can be no doubt who should be the prime suspect behind any event of “catastrophic terrorism”. So who are the authors of this prescient article about how the U.S. should respond to an act of “catastrophic terrorism”?
ASHTON B. CARTER
Ashton B. Carter is a Ford Foundation Professor of Science and International Affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, and a former Assistant Secretary of Defense. The 1998 essay he co-wrote with Deutch and Zelikow was published in a book he wrote with William Perry, entitled Preventive Defense: An American Security Strategy for the 21st Century.
Carter is also a member of Board of Trustees for MITRE, where he was a trustee from 1988 to 1993. The MITRE Corp. is a major defense contracting organization based in Bedford, Massachusetts, which is headed by the former Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Dr. James Rodney Schlesinger. MITRE’s crucial communications, command, and control systems clearly failed on 9-11, something that deserves investigating.
From 2001 to 2002, Carter served on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism and advised on the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Carter is also a senior partner in a company called Global Technology Partners, LLC (GTP), of which William J. Perry is the chairman. John Mark Deutch, the former Director of Central Intelligence and co-author of the article, is also a senior partner in GTP.
AFFILIATE OF ROTHSCHILD
What is GTP? Global Technology Partners, LLC is “an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild North America, formed to make acquisitions of and investments in technology, defense, and aerospace-related companies”, according to a biographical sketch of one of the corporation’s senior partners, Paul G. Kaminski. Elsewhere it is described as “an aerospace and defense investment banking boutique affiliated with the Rothschild Group” or “a professional services firm associated with the Rothschild Group of investment banks”.
So Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch, William J. Perry, and the other fellows at GTP work for the Rothschild family, the Jewish financiers of governments – and founders of the state of Israel.
JOHN MARK DEUTCH
This explains how Deutch, who was born in Belgium, and his father, who was born in Russia and who only came to the United States in 1940, were so quickly advanced within the Washington power structure. Deutch’s father, Michael J. Deutch, was born in Smolensk, Russia in 1907. The Deutch family came to the United States in 1940 where Michael quickly became deputy director at the War Production Board, in charge of making synthetic rubber.
A December 27, 1946 article in the Chicago Tribune, entitled “List Alien ‘Rulers’ in U.S.”, listed some of the foreigners found in a secret 71-page report who had received high government wartime posts. Michael J. Deutch was one of them. “Correspondence passing between the Secretary of the Interior and the Office of War Mobilization indicate that Deutch was pushed up the ladder of promotion with unusual vigor by some one,” the secret report from the House Committee on Un-American Activities said.
Michael Deutch was a Russian Jew whose family supposedly “fled the Bolshevik Revolution for Belgium”. In Belgium, where he studied chemical engineering, he married Rachel Fischer, the daughter of Jean “Yonah” Fischer, a diamond merchant of Antwerp who ran the Zionist Federation of Belgium. This connection could explain why Deutch was promoted so quickly when he came to Washington.
John Deutch’s maternal grandfather, Yonah Fischer, was a prominent Zionist and friend of Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann. Fischer was a very high-level Zionist within the international military-political network centered in London. Yonah had extensive business arrangements in Palestine/Israel and even started a town which is named after him – Kefar Yonah.
John Deutch has served as a director of Citigroup and Citibank since 1987. He is also a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
PHILIP D. ZELIKOW
Philip David Zelikow is all over 9-11, its aftermath, and the subsequent wars in the Middle East. Three years after warning of “catastrophic terrorism”, Zelikow became the Executive Director of the 9-11 Commission, the appointed government whitewash which utterly failed to address the key questions and evidence of the terror attacks of 9-11.
Zelikow, from Houston, served on President George W. Bush’s transition team in 2001. After Bush took office, Zelikow was named to the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and served on the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, which produced the extremely flawed Help America Vote Act of 2002.
Zelikow had been a career foreign service officer overseas and served on to the National Security Council. More recently, Zelikow was a member of the Iraq Study Group, which pretended to study what went wrong with the disastrous, illegal, and ill-advised war that Jewish Zionist Neo-Cons, the controlled media, and the Bush administration all pushed so hard for. Zelikow, the grandson of a Russian Jewish immigrant tailor, is very close to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He can be seen as having been her legal and Zionist handler. Zelikow joined the National Security Council in the George H.W. Bush administration, at the same time as Condoleezza Rice. Only recently, Zelikow resigned as Counselor of the U.S. Department of State, where he served as a senior policy advisor to the Secretary of State.
The “Global Technology Partners” who work for the Rothschild family in North America. Chairman of the GTC LLC, William Perry, sits in the middle. The Zionist agent John Deutch is standing behind him in the blue sweater. Ashton B. Carter is standing at the far left.
“All The News That Sulzberger’s Propaganda Rag Saw Fit To Distort”
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions, Half -Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
FREE SAMPLE ~ 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
FREE SAMPLE DAY
NY Times: Newly Vigilant, U.S. Will Screen Fliers for Ebola
By SABRINA TAVERNISE
Federal health officials will require temperature checks for the first time at five major American airports for people arriving from the three West African countries hardest hit by the deadly Ebola virus.
NY Times: Death of Thomas Eric Duncan in Dallas Fuels Alarm Over Ebola
By MANNY FERNANDEZ and DAVE PHILIPPS
Mr. Duncan’s death renewed questions about health officials’ preparedness to contain Ebola. Hours after, hospital officials said a second patient had been admitted in Dallas.
A double shot of Ebola fear combined with a huge front page photo. Get ready folks. Here comes the iron hand:
“Federal health officials will require temperature checks for the first time at five major American airports for people arriving from the three West African countries hardest hit by the deadly Ebola virus.”
Temperature checks? If we are to be concerned about a deadly virus arriving from Africa, what bloody darn good is a temperature check going to do? Symptoms of Ebola do not even begin until two days to three weeks after contracting the virus. After 6 hours on a trans-Atlantic flight, wouldn’t other travelers have already been infected by then? How do the Feds propose to screen those newly infected passengers who haven’t manifested the fever symptoms yet?
How far do the Feds intend to go with this? How much intrusion will the public tolerate? Are quarantines in the works? If the sheeple’s obedience to the “shelter in place” order issued after the Boston Smoke Bombing of 2013 is any indication, Boobus Americanus will applaud the removal of whatever liberties he has left. “Quarantine ’em all! Let God sort them out!”
The rapid development of this thing is very unsettling, and very suspicious. The widespread belief in Western Africa is that Ebola was deliberately planted via vaccination programs linked to the notorious CIA-NGO-Mossad front run by powerful French-Zionist Bernard Kouchner, Doctors Without Borders (French: Médecins Sans Frontières). So passionate are the West Africans in this belief that they have taken up machetes to chase off the “aid workers” of Kouchner’s nefarious NGO (Non-Governmental Organization). Let us again revisit the headline from The New York Times‘ front page of July 27, 2014.
NY Times: Fear of Ebola Breeds a Terror of Physicians
By ADAM NOSSITER
Health workers with Doctors Without Borders have been threatened with knives, stones and machetes by Guineans who blame them for spreading the deadly virus.
Kouchner’s Médecins Sans Frontières is loaded with Jewish Doctors who care so very deeply about the Black “goyim” of Africa. On right: Kouchner pals around with the evil George Bush.
The Ebola virus is said to have originated with monkeys, and is now spreading across the planet via airplanes. It appears as though the Masters of the Universe knew this was coming all along. For the past 15 years, and especially the past 7 years, the press and Hollywood have been prepping the public mind for such a deadly pandemic.
Following are some of the more recent films (some of which involve big names) whose plot lines revolve around a pandemic. Apes, airplanes and Federal quarantines are common themes in many of these films. Art imitating life? Or art, and conspiracy, dictating life? You be the judge.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2012) Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (2014)
In the two recent Planet of the Apes blockbusters, the “simian flu” spread via airplane travel, after originating from an American lab, then being carried to France, to Africa, and then back and forth across the world. The virus ended up killing much of humanity. But Ebola predictive programming was not limited to Hollywood. The topic had come up frequently in the news media and even in TV commercials.
The most disturbing and specific example of “predictive programming” in regard to an Ebola pandemic was a 2001 ad for Holiday Inn. The 30-second spot depicted a layman in a Hazmat suit pretending to be an expert. Upon accidentally dropping a glass vial full of Ebola onto the floor, he reassures his concerned colleagues to not worry. When asked about his expertise, he responds, “I’m not actually a scientist, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night.”
The 2001 Holiday Inn ad joked about the virus: “Don’t worry. It’s not the airborne strain.”
Very funny. The shocking (in retrospect) TV ad was produced by Fallon McElliot of Minneapolis, an ad firm which was, and still is, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Publicis Group, the world’s 3rd largest advertising and media conglomerate. Since 1987, the CEO and Chairman of the Management Board of Publicis has been Maurice Lévy of France, who, like Kouchner (Doctors Without Borders), is a Zionist mogul of the first rank.
Lévy is perhaps the most influential man in advertising worldwide. In January 2008, the King of Publicis was bestowed the International Leadership Award 2008 from the Anti-Defamation League in recognition of his stance towards “tolerance and diversity” (i.e. degeneracy and anti-Whiteism).
In searching for some sort of connection between Zionist Lévy of France and Zionist Kouchner of France, a photo of the two “Ebola-linked” chums surfaced.
Lévy (center) / Kouchner (right) partying at the famed Publicis Drugstore Restaurant in Paris.
Why is it that whenever there is trouble anywhere in the world, from Ukraine, to ISIS, to the dying U.S. economy, to Ebola, these types of kosher characters always seem to show up under every rock? Your concerned reporter here at The Anti-New York Times hopes and prays that his 95% reliable “gut instinct” is wrong on this hunch.
Maybe the West Africans are just being “paranoid” in accusing Kouchner’s Doctors Without Borders of spreading Ebola. And maybe Lévy’s Holiday Inn Ebola ad from 2001 was just a “coincidence” and a “joke”. But the prophetic words of a real Frenchman from the 18th century are haunting yours truly today.
“The Jews are born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”
Let’s hope and pray that Voltaire’s “gut instinct” turns out to be wrong as well.
Kouchner (left) with Netanyahu / Levy of Publicis with ADL’s Abe Foxman
Underneath the beautiful Sea of Galilee lies a hidden fault-line that runs down from Mount Hermon through the Jordan Valley to the Red Sea, the Arabian peninsula, and on to the heart of East Africa. Over thousands of years, earthquakes along this fault-line have devastated countless civilisations. Today there is a human fault-line running through the same land – a fault-line that is largely hidden from view until it erupts in violence. The cause of these volcanic eruptions has to do with the pressure of two peoples, like two tectonic plates, trying to occupy the same land – one the military occupier, the other the occupied. The media present this as a clash between two cultures, Palestinian and Israeli or Oriental and Western. As I hope to show, the convictions of Christian Zionists have made a significant contribution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
In general terms, Zionism may be defined as ‘the national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel’. The term ‘Zionism’ was first coined in 1892 by Nathan Birnbaum, then a student in Vienna. A year later in 1893, he published a booklet entitled The National Rebirth of the Jewish People in Its Homeland as a Means of Solving the Jewish Problem, in which he advocated Jewish nationalistic ideas that Theodor Herzl was to later expound in A Jewish State, published in 1896. At the First Zionist Congress, which Herzl convened in Basel a year later in 1897, he and Birnbaum articulated the deep longings of many Jewish people for their own homeland. Various strands of Zionism emerged in the early twentieth century including practical, socialist, and communist.
The most recent and probably most destructive form to appear is known as Messianic Zionism. Distinct from much more traditional and less extreme expressions of Zionism, this is associated with individuals like Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, his son Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook, Rabbi Meir Kahane, and Gershon Salomon, together with the Gush Emunim movement and the Temple Mount Faithful. Messianic Zionism was spawned from within the ultra-Orthodox subcultures of the ‘Charedi Bible Belt’ around Jerusalem following the 1967 ‘Six-Day War’. The Charedim (ultra-Orthodox Jews) were, according to Howard Sachar, ‘the first to embrace the territorialist mysticism inherent in the 1967 triumph’ and came to be a decisive factor in Likud’s electoral victory in 1997.
Equating Arabs with the ancient Amalekites, and convinced they have a divinely ordained mandate to carry out ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians from Israel, religious Zionists have been in the forefront of the illegal occupation of Palestinian land, attacks on Muslims and mosques, and the systematic expansion of the West Bank settlements, especially in places like Arab East Jerusalem and Hebron.
Ironically, the Zionist vision, which initially called simply for a ‘publicly secured and legally assured homeland for the Jews in Palestine’, was largely nurtured and shaped by Christian Zionists, long before it was able to inspire widespread Jewish support; proto-Christian Zionism predated and nurtured Jewish Zionism, while the contemporary Christian Zionist movement emerged only after 1967, alongside Messianic Zionism, in part as a reaction to the widespread criticism Israel has endured over the last thirty-five years.
Christian Zionism defined
At its simplest, Christian Zionism is a political form of philo-Semitism, and can be defined as ‘Christian support for Zionism’. The term ‘Christian Zionist’ first appears to have been used by Theodor Herzl to describe Henri Dunant, the Swiss philanthropist and founder of the Red Cross. Dunant was one of only a handful of Gentiles to be invited to the First Zionist Congress. Walter Riggans interprets the term in an overtly political sense as ‘any Christian who supports the Zionist aim of the sovereign State of Israel, its army, government, education, etc., but it can describe a Christian who claims to support the State of Israel for any reason.’
Evangelicals, in particular, are increasingly polarised as to whether Christian Zionism is biblical and orthodox or heretical and cultic. Two mutually exclusive positions have emerged: those of covenantalism and dispensationalism. A detailed examination of both is available elsewhere. Colin Chapman observes, ‘It is hard to think of another situation anywhere in the world where politics have come to be so closely bound up with religion, and where scriptures have such a profound effect on political action.’
Walter Riggans, for example, elaborates on the relationship between theology and politics in Zionism:
A biblical Zionism, which is surely the desire of every Christian, will be fundamentally about God and His purposes. Thus Zionism, when seen in a proper Christian perspective, will be understood as a branch of theology, not of politics … The State of Israel is only the beginning of what God is doing for and through the Jewish people.
He goes on to suggest that Christians should not only support the idea of a Jewish State, but also support its policies: ‘… in the most modest of ways I would suggest that Christians … must give support in principle to the State of Israel as a sign of God’s mercy and faithfulness, and as a biblical mark that God is very much at work in the world.’
While not specifying the geographical extent of Zion, the Israel branch of the Lausanne Consultation on Jewish Evangelism, which draws together most evangelical and charismatic denominations, as well as messianic and evangelical mission agencies, made the following commitment in 1989:
We affirm our belief that, as part of the fulfillment of God’s promises in the Bible, the Jewish people have a right to the land of Israel. We further affirm the legitimacy of the Jewish national political entity in the land within safe and secure borders.
Advocates argue, therefore, that Christian Zionism is born out of the conviction that God has a continuing special relationship with, and covenantal purpose for, the Jewish people, apart from the church, and that the Jewish people have a divine right to possess the land of Palestine. This is based on a literal and futurist interpretation of the Bible and the conviction that Old Testament prophecies concerning the Jewish people are being fulfilled in the contemporary State of Israel.
For Christian Zionists, God’s promise to Abraham remains unconditional and eternal:
To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates … The whole land of Canaan, where you are now an alien, I will give as an everlasting possession to you and your descendants after you; and I will be their God. (Gen. 15:18; 17:8)
Invariably, Christian Zionists are therefore also defenders of, and apologists for, the State of Israel. This support consistently involves opposing those deemed to be critical of, or hostile toward Israel, but also leads to the justification of Israel’s occupation and settlement of the West Bank, the Golan, and Gaza, on biblical grounds.
Whether consciously or otherwise, Christian Zionists subscribe to a religious Jewish agenda best expressed by Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, who claims: ‘We should not forget … that the supreme purpose of the ingathering of exiles and the establishment of our State is the building of the Temple. The Temple is at the very top of the pyramid.’ Another rabbi, Yisrael Meida, explains the link between politics and theology within Jewish Zionism: ‘It is all a matter of sovereignty. He who controls the Temple Mount, controls Jerusalem. And he who controls Jerusalem, controls the land of Israel.’ This paradigm may be illustrated by way of three concentric rings. The land represents the outer ring, Jerusalem the middle ring, and the Temple is the centre ring. The three rings comprise the Zionist agenda by which the land was claimed in 1948, the Old City of Jerusalem was occupied in 1967, and the Temple site is being contested. For the religious Zionist, Jewish or Christian, the three are inextricably linked. The Christian Zionist vision, therefore, is to work to see all three under exclusive Jewish control, since this will lead to blessing for the entire world, as nations recognise and respond to what God is seen to be doing in and through Israel.
As tensions simmer in the Middle East, so the stakes are raised to gain the moral high ground, and the Bible is used both to silence Israel’s critics as well as to castigate her. In such a polarised culture, anti-Zionism is equated with anti-Semitism, while the Shoah has been exploited, by what Norman Finkelstein describes as ‘Holocaustology’, to immunise Israel from censure.
Grace Halsell, who regards the movement as a cult, asks: ‘What is the message of the Christian Zionist? Simply stated, it is this: every act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God, and should be condoned, supported, and even praised by the rest of us.’ Dale Crowley, a Washington-based religious broadcaster, similarly describes dispensational Christian Zionism as the ‘fastest growing cult in America’:
It’s not composed of ‘crazies’ so much as mainstream, middle- to upper-middle-class Americans. They give millions of dollars each week – to the TV evangelists who expound the fundamentals of the cult. They read Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye. They have one goal: to facilitate God’s hand to waft them up to heaven free from all the trouble, from where they will watch Armageddon and the destruction of planet earth.
The Middle East Council of Churches (MECC), drawing together the historic as well as evangelical churches of the Holy Land, rejects Christian Zionism ‘as representing a heretical interpretation of Holy Scripture’, while John Stott describes it as ‘biblically anathema’.
Now that you know what a Zionist is, read the following…
HOW TO BECOME AN INSTANT “EXPERT” ON THE MIDDLE EAST
November 20, 2006
Why do Zionists get their news articles into every newspaper and magazine? Why do they appear on every TV news outlet, and get speaking engagements on every major university campus? And why are they always called “experts”?
Is it because they now control the majority of major media outlets? Yes, but this is only part of the picture.
Zionists succeed because they hire booking agents, or they operate through propaganda mills, which fabricate most of the information you see in the news.
Let’s examine how this works…
One example – chosen at random – is Benador Associates, a Washington “public relations firm” whose proprietor, Eleana Benador, is from Peru. In the photo below, she is the blue midget-in-the-middle. At right, she is seen discussing Richard Perle‘s comb-over…
When Perle was disgraced by multiple scandals and forced out of the Pentagon, he hired Benador to help him continue to spread his propaganda in the American news media. In one humorous example, Perle wrote an op-ed expressing doubts about the Iraqi bloodbath he helped plan in the first place, and then used Benador to get the piece into Vanity Fair magazine. Vanity Fair promised it would not publish the op-ed until after the November 7th, 2006 elections, but “accidentally” published it anyway, causing Perle to become enraged (“I never said that!” – but you wrote it – “Yeah, but I never said that!”)
Immediately after 9/11, news channels needed “informed opinions” on why Americans must die in the neocons’ wars of conquest. Universities needed public speakers to explain why Iran must be bombed. Congress needed “expert testimony” to help them convince the peasantry that more tax dollars should go to weapons makers (and Israel) than ever before.
To serve this exploding market, countless right-wing booking agencies and “think tanks” sprang up overnight in Washington like so many toxic mushrooms, while other outfits that existed before 9/11 opened new “corporate offices” abroad.
We’ll focus specifically on “think tanks” below, but let’s continue with Ms. Benador, the Peruvian wonder-from-down-under. Many of the American media’s most esteemed Zionists can be found on her client list, which includes not only Jewish-Americans, but Muslim traitors who are so desperate for notoriety that they use Benador to get their trash into newspapers and magazines. One of those Muslim traitor-clients is Amir Taheri, seen below (right) with the Inca princess herself.
Taheri, an Iranian by birth, gets phone calls whenever Zionist rags need an “expert” quote on Iran. In mid-2006, he dreamed up a whopper, and claimed that the Iranian government was forcing non-Muslims to wear special clothing. To spread the lie, he had Ms. Benador contact a writer for the National Post of Canada, who wrote a story that appeared on the front page (May 18, 2006)…
Taheri claimed that all non-Muslims are forced to wear special clothing in Iran, but the National Post, being ultra-Zionist,* only mentions Jews in the headline. The absurd tale lituptheblogosphere and saw print in all major newspapers. It was sexy and titillating, and had elements of a clever hoax, including foreign sources, vague details, and emotional appeal. Most importantly, it had proper timing, since Israel and the USA were desperate to regard Iran as Nazi Germany.
[*The National Post was founded by Conrad Black, a notoriously corrupt and multiply indicted semi-mobster. Though he converted from the Anglican Church to the Roman Catholic Church in 1986, he never met a Zionist he didn’t like. His “conversion” seems to have been for business purposes: in 2000, he described Roman Catholic archbishop Frederick Henry of Calgary as a “jumped-up little twerp of a bishop” for criticizing Black’s unscrupulous union-busting tactics.]
Unfortunately, Taheri’s lie wasn’t big enough. Successful hoaxes are so emotionally arresting (WMD, Mushroom Cloud) that Americans refuse to believe their own eyes when they see hard evidence that a story is false. With Taheri’s lie, however, no Jews were being killed in Iran, and Israel was not involved, so Americans felt safe to check on the story without getting death threats from the ADL. The lie was quickly exposed, and the National Post removed it from their web site, leaving right-wing loudmouths like Rush Limbaugh to whine, “It may not be true, but it should be.” Canada’s Prime Minister Harper said Iran is “very capable” of such actions anyway. The New York Post ignored the retraction altogether.
Ms. Benador took the gaffe in stride, driven with the zest of someone who has always been a loser, but is enjoying notoriety in a post-9/11 world. Like fat-boy Karl Rove (who is also enjoying momentary glory), she works 18-hour days, arranging between 15 and 30 TV interviews for her Zionist clients a week, plus an average of five op-eds in influential newspapers. Also she gets lucrative speaking engagements for clients like Dennis Prager and the neocon wannabe Robert James Woolsey Jr., who directed the CIA from 1993 to 1995. Charles Krauthammer is another Zionist client.
These creeps are “renowned experts” because they pay Ms. Benador to relentlessly hound media outlets until someone prints their trash.
In this game, no knowledge is required to be an “expert.” Indeed, most of Benador’s clients have never been to the Middle East, never learned any of the languages, and rarely (if ever) done any serious research into their areas of “expertise.” Benador herself purportedly speaks ten or fifteen languages, and has traveled all over the planet. However, the following post taken from her web site sounds like it was written by a child…
Today, xixteen [sic] years ago…
Today, sixteen years ago already, in Geneva, Switzerland, I gave birth to the most beautiful baby boy… it was so unbelievable, after the full-term pregnancy of nine months, and I was well and walking around till the day before… it was a miracle for me… my way to tell the world that I am a normal woman, blessed by G-d with a son, my own flesh and blood… That’s how Gabriel was born…
This is a woman who furnishes national security “experts” for major news outlets. Clearly she’s intellectually challenged, yet she’s found a market in news producers who work on tight schedules and need “experts” now. Producers of news programs have no time to look for someone who has genuine knowledge (plus loyalty to Israel), so they call booking agents like Benador, who has a “stable” of monkeys already dressed in a suit and tie, sitting just minutes from the studio.
Newspapers do the same thing. When a reporter needs an “official” quote to anchor a story, he can choose from hundreds of PR firms or think tanks…
Most of Benador’s clients are failed writers who cannot get their drivel published on its own merits. Richard Perle, for example, once wrote a pathetic novel titled Hard Line, whose hero works late into the night at the Pentagon, single-handedly rescuing mankind from “liberals” who want to sign away America’s nuclear deterrent in a disarmament deal with the Russians. Ten years later, Perle was cast in the real-life role of his fictional hero, but the Russians were no longer a threat, so he had to make do with Muslims.
Even former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger wrote a couple of novels that went nowhere.
We might examine a list of sordid events involving other PR firms (such as Hill and Knowlton‘s false claim that Iraqi soldiers were ripping babies from incubators and throwing them onto the floor), but space is limited, so let’s turn to think tanks, which are the main factories of Zionist propaganda.
The term “think tank” conjures up an image of quiet studied reflection on weighty topics. In reality, think tanks are propaganda mills that fabricate 80 percent of the lies you see or read in the news. (Politicians supply the other 20%.)
Unlike the news media in most other countries, which welcome academics in the field of public discourse, the American news media relies almost exclusively on think tanks, as does the U.S. government. If a person is not from a propaganda mill in Washington DC, his opinion doesn’t count, regardless of how much knowledge he or she has.
The “think tank” label was originally applied in 1959 to the RAND Corporation, headquartered in Santa Monica, California. During the Cold War, the RAND people cranked out “studies” for the Pentagon that urged a preemptive nuking of Russia. Several other think tanks appeared later, but their number did not start to expand until 1970.
By the 1980s, think tanks began to take off. Many were (and still are) fly-by-night operations consisting of one person, or a skeleton staff whose sole purpose is to issue canned press releases.
When the Soviet Union fell in 1991, think tanks worried about their future… until 9/11 saved the day. After that, think tanks exploded as never before.
Today there are about 3,500 worldwide, most of which are in Washington DC, where they can be found on every street corner. This is where middle-aged American Jews wind up when they can’t get real jobs. They join a think tank and are given titles such as “senior fellow” or “adjunct scholar,” despite having little or no academic credentials. Unlike real academics, they are not expected to conduct research first and draw conclusions second, nor are they expected to submit their papers to peer review. In fact, the term “think tank” is a misnomer. These clowns don’t think; they justify.
Right-wing think tanks are by far the most numerous and best financed, since they allow wealthy business interests to promote their elitist propaganda. For example, Wall Street firms support think tanks that urge the privatization of social security. And since think tanks are 501(c) operations, money given to them is tax-deductible. With funding from investment banks and the like, “scholarly institutes” churn out “studies” that use sophistry, charlatanism, and numbers voodoo to prevent genuine debate.
Donations to think tanks can be as big as the donor’s checkbook, and are usually secret. Meanwhile, the nonprofit, tax-exempt status of think tanks makes them ideal for putting special interest money to work.
Some of the think tanks are federally funded. The U.S. Department of Defense sponsors ten of these, a few of which have abused their privileged status (and your tax dollars) by exceeding their charters and cranking out bilge for Zionists and other parties who get free “consulting” paid for by the media.
In all cases, these operations are concerned with marketing and sales, not with accuracy or truth. They deal in idea management, not “research.” For example, The Heritage Foundation publishes a telephone directory that lists thousands of right-wing “experts” and policy organizations. Heritage also maintains a 24-hour hotline for the media, which provides quotes that promote Zionist or right-wing ideology on any subject. Heritage’s “information marketing” department offers color-coded index cards with pre-printed talking points for any news organization that wants to do an interview.
Heritage also has news studios where reporters can tape interviews, with a 24-hour hotline for reservations. For smaller newspapers that don’t have money to pay Heritage fees, hundreds of anonymous articles and op-ed pieces can be had for free. Heritage also trains editors, reporters, and news producers in “computer-assisted research and reporting,” using Heritage computers. Reporters can get e-mail bulletins on the “hottest topics,” with contact information for hundreds of Heritage-approved “experts,” classified into 180 areas of “expertise” (see image below).
Heritage computers track 3,500 journalists (organized by specialty), which Heritage staffers frequently call to make sure they are up on the latest misinformation. Each Heritage “study” is printed out in a two-page summary, which is then turned into an op-ed piece, and then distributed to newspapers through the Heritage Features Syndicate. Meanwhile, Heritage network computers link “policy analysts” with Republican Party officials, right-wing “experts,” and grassroots Zionist constituencies. Heritage also publishes a “Resource Guide to Public Policy Experts,” which lists more than 2,000 individuals and 400 organizations, all of which support right-wing or Zionist causes. Further, Heritage runs a bi-monthly working group of right-wing organizations, and maintains a speakers bureau to sow Zionist propaganda on college campuses.
Historically, think tanks have not been successful abroad, since foreigners recognize propaganda much more readily than do Americans. Today however, American think tanks sell their advertising skills to dictatorships everywhere. For example, the Brookings Institution collaborates with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar, as does the RAND Corporation.
Some of these think tanks are huge, while others are boiler-room operations involving no more than an individual with a computer. Instead of blogging, these lone hacks write “studies” that support Zionist wars of aggression. One example of a boiler-room agent is the abrasive Rita Katz (below), an Iraq-born Jewess whose family emigrated to Israel, where she married a Jewish doctor. Later the doctor got a job in the USA.
As a housewife, Katz spent her lonely days on the phone, crying to her mother in Israel. She tried working at a couple of different jobs, but employers found her pushiness intolerable. After 9/11, Katz realized that few people in the U.S. government knew anything about the Middle East other than “Israel good, all others bad.” (Most Congressmen today still don’t know the difference between Shiites and Sunnis.) Voilà – she had stumbled upon a Goyim goldmine.
Because Katz was born in Iraq, she spoke Arabic, and started translating documents in her spare time. Then she presented her results to anyone who would listen. Like most people in her “profession,” Katz is a failed novelist, but found that the Goyim are willing to pay for imaginary terror “threats” that involve everything from botulism to poisoned adhesive on the back of printed postage stamps.
In 2003, Katz published a “non-fiction” book titled Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman Who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America. In it, Katz arrogantly boasts that, “the F.B.I. didn’t possess one-thousandth of my knowledge on the relevant issues.” Since Katz is female, the program 60 Minutes brought her in for a segment on her book. Katz, who fancies herself a secret agent (as does everyone else in the Zionist propaganda game), appeared on 60 Minutes wearing a disguise.
Occasionally her arrogance and stupidity get her into trouble, as when she told authorities that Mar-Jac Poultry, a Georgia chicken farm, was sending money to terrorists. The charge was absurd, and Mar-Jac Poultry filed a lawsuit against Katz.
Regarding translation, an Arabic word can have four or five different meanings, but when Katz “renders” an Arabic document “correctly,” it turns out to be a call for suicide bombing. Fortunately the Goyim don’t know the difference. Unfortunately the field of “open-source counterterrorism” is now packed with James Bond wannabes who fight each other for attention. Katz realized she had to find a niche, so she teamed up with one Josh Devon, who she met at school. Mr. Devon had majored in social sciences in college, and faced a lifetime of flipping burgers and sitting at home reading science fiction novels. Thus he was delighted when Katz showed him how to exploit the horror of 9/11 for fun and profit. Now Devon runs Katz’s “Search for International Terrorist Entities” web site.
The subject of translations brings us to a special category of “think tanks” that focus on creative interpretations of documents from the Middle East. This is a crucial area, since the Goyim “know,” for example, that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad said, “Israel must be wiped off the face of the map.” The Goyim “know” this because it’s been repeated countless times in the news media. Of course this is another Zionist lie, like the hoax about Jews having to wear stars in Iran. No such idiom exists in Farsi. Ahmadinejad simply quoted an old speech of the Ayatollah Khomeini, who said, (translated strictly) “The occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.”
Back in 1996, David Wurmser and his wife Meyrav helped Richard Perle and Douglas Feith write the “Clean Break” paper (the actual title was “Rebuilding Zionism”), which called for an end to peace talks with Palestinians. It also urged the bombing of Syria, and demanded that the Goyim invade Iraq.
In 1998, Yigal Carmon and Meyrav Wurmser started the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), which followed the trail of people like Yasser Arafat, hoping to catch them saying something in Arabic that they wouldn’t say to Americans. Occasionally, Arafat would go to Egypt and speak plainly, whereupon Ms. Wurmser would translate his statements into juicy “gotchas” for the American media.
MEMRI scours Arabic newspaper articles, television shows, political statements, sermons, textbooks, food labels, and bathroom graffiti for any phrase or syllable that does not praise Israeli aggression. Juicy nuggets are then forwarded to the Goyim for punitive action.
Like most other Zionist lie factories, MEMRI got its biggest break with 9/11, which created an urgent need for translations of Arabic and Farsi documents that were “accurate” (i.e., supportive of Zionist aggression). Requests for translations poured in not just from American Goyim, but also from right-wing politicos in Europe, Japan, Turkey, and elsewhere. Amid this bonanza, Ms. Wurmser immediately hired a dozen translators (today up to 40) and opened “branch offices” in Jerusalem, Berlin, London, and Tokyo.
MEMRI receives generous contributions from 250 donors, plus multiple foundations, which pay tens of thousands of dollars for “annual reports” that support Zionist causes. MEMRI itself pays no taxes. (Taxes are for the Goyim.)
Today Ms. Wurmser and her merry staff of hate-mongers work around the clock with missionary zeal to spread the Zionist word. Their lies are quoted in major newspapers and magazines, such that most of the Goyim now consider MEMRI to be an “awesome source of truth.”
And so, gentle reader, you now have the secret to better blogging. The trick is to hire a booking agent, or start your own “terrorist hunting” web site, or else apply for a job in a think tank. Then you will become an instant “expert” in any field you like, provided you support war, corporate elitism, and Zionism above all.
Published on 3 Sep 2014
Rita Katz says that her organization released the beheading of Stephen Sotloff video ‘before ISIS had a chance to’ – “we actually had that video beforehand and were able to beat them (ISIS) with the release”
Israel Puppet Patrick Clawson Advocates “Crisis Initiation” to Start War with Iran
The War Party: Zionism and American NeoCon foreign policy – Part 1
BBC America (live in London studio): September 11, 2001
At a little over 7 hours after the attacks on 9/11/01, Ehud Barak and Frank Gaffney are both calling for a “Global War on Terror”.
BBC America: Well, I’m joined here in the studio now by Ehud Barak who, until earlier this year, was the Prime Minister of Israel; by James Rubin, who was President Clinton’s Assistant Secretary of State; and by Rosemary Hollis of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Mr. Barak, first of all, should we see this as an act designed to draw attention to what is happening in the Middle East, or should we see it as something quite separate from that?
EHUD BARAK: It’s clear that the whole Western civilization is at war with world terror. It might have some kind of indirect relationship to something that happened either in Afghanistan or somewhere else in the Middle East, but this is not the case. When they are ready to hit the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it means that we are basically at war. And I am fully confident [the] American people, which is a tough and courageous people, and have tough leadership at the helmet [helm], they will know how to fight back, and I believe that leaders all around the world, here in the UK, in Europe, in Russia – the Russians will fully cooperate with this, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel of course, and others, should join hands to defeat terror, period. We cannot afford this kind of threat to our whole way of life.
BBC: I’ll come back to that point in a moment. I want to bring in Frank Gaffney, who’s the director of the Center for Security Policy, who’s in Washington. How do you think the United States will respond to this, and are you surprised, as an expert in security matters, that nobody had any inkling of what happened?
Frank Gaffney was a contributor to the Project for the New American Century.
FRANK GAFFNEY: Well, to answer the second question first, I’m not frankly surprised, because this is precisely the way the cells that we’re up against here, and perhaps their state sponsors, are organizing themselves and conducting their activities. It is purposely designed to keep the lowest possible profiles, avoid signatures – as they say in Intelligence business – and conduct their affairs in such a way that we won’t know what’s happened to us until it has happened.
As to how the United States will respond, it remains to be seen, of course. My hope is, that as any number of people have said, on this program and elsewhere here in Washington in recent hours, the United States is at war now; and I hope that the President will respond appropriately and accordingly. This is not a matter for business as usual, judicial process, forensic investigations, and so on. [Or apparently anything that represents a real investigation into the day’s events.] I believe that we have been struck in a way that is probably going to be a precursor to even worse. And it is time for us to act as I think our friends in Israel have been doing for some time, quite correctly, which is to use such intelligence as we do have, to use such force as we have at our disposal, to strike at and try to destroy these terrorists and their sponsors before they strike again.
BBC: But do you know who they are?
FRANK GAFFNEY: Uh, we probably won’t know, if at all, uh, for some time, with precision, who is responsible for this precise attack; therefore I would go after everyone who is engaged in terrorist acts against us, uh, everyone who has made known their, uh, determination to do harm to the United States. I think we ought to use this as an opportunity, uh, as has been pointed out by others, to put them on the run: let them know that they’ve got no place to hide, and such places as they hide are going to be very difficult, uh, places from which to operate against us.
BBC: We heard earlier on that the United States security in airports was rather lax, because there was a feeling that this was the kind of thing that couldn’t happen. There’d been, obviously been terrorist incidents in the United States, but compared with the way that terrorism is expected in Europe and in the Middle East, in the United States it’s not thought – [Unfortunately, this is where I changed the channel to watch local news coverage.]
Would anyone who has a copy of the entire interview (with the other BBC guests) please post it and alert Abel Danger: thank you! Also feel free to publicly leak fresh proof that incriminates the 9/11 perpetrators and accelerates their being brought to justice. We need to see prosecutions. The international criminal syndicate’s days are running out: you can help speed up this process and thus benefit all of humanity.
Oct. 1, 2002, 17:00 PDT (FTW) – The George W. Bush Administration’s intentions of removing Saddam Hussein from power are not a recent development by any stretch of the imagination. Top White House officials affiliated with conservative think tanks and past administrations have been developing strategies for removing the Iraqi leader since the 1990s.
One such think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), published a report in September 2000 recommending policies for preserving and expanding U.S. dominance in world affairs, including an aggressive policy for deposing Saddam Hussein. Members of this group include Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, convicted Iran–Contra perjurer and current National Security Council (NSC) staffer Elliot Abrams, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and I. Lewis Libby, Cheney’s Chief of Staff and Assistant for National Security Affairs.
Referring to the Persian Gulf region, the report states, “Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”
The crux of the report advocates bulking up America’s military so it can be “able to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.” It lists southern Europe, the Middle East, Central- and East Asia as targets for increased military deployments.
Gary Schmitt, one of the report’s project co-chairmen and a former Reagan policy adviser, told FTW that a U.S. invasion of Iraq is inevitable. “We will definitely be involved in Iraq for two reasons,” said Schmitt. “One is because of issues myself, the administration, and others have laid out for a number of years, and two, there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell Saddam will allow inspections that matter.”
ALL THE VICE PRESIDENT’S MEN
U.S. military action against Iraq to oust Saddam Hussein has long been a goal of members of the present Bush Administration. The PNAC report was based upon a 1992 draft of the Pentagon’s Defense Planning Guidance, which was prepared for then-Defense Secretary Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Libby. At the time, Libby and Wolfowitz were part of Cheney’s policy staff.
Libby has an extensive background in international relations and defense policy. He joined President Reagan’s State Department in 1981 as a member of the Policy Planning Staff and then became the Director of Special Projects in the Department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs.
Libby was a Deputy Undersecretary for Policy in President George H. W. Bush’s Defense Department headed by Cheney.
He has a law degree from Columbia University, and during the Clinton years was a managing partner for the Washington, D.C. international law firm Dechert, Price & Rhoads. Libby was also a legal consultant for the “Cox Committee,” the congressional body that investigated Chinese breaches of U.S. national security and trade secrets in 1999.
Wolfowitz has worked for the government as a defense policy strategist since 1973. He was head of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff from 1981 to 1982 and was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Regional Programs from 1977 to 1980.
During his time with regional programs, Wolfowitz helped establish the force that would become the United States Central Command. He also contributed to the creation of the Navy’s Maritime Prepositioning Ships Program, which his Defense Department bio describes as the supply ships program that provided “the backbone of the initial U.S. deployment twelve years later in Operation Desert Shield.”
Under Reagan, Wolfowitz served as U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia and Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, where he was responsible for shaping U.S. relations with all Far East nations.
Along with five fellow signatories of PNAC’s 1997 statement of principles, Wolfowitz is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University. He was the dean and professor of international relations at the University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS).
Thomas Donnelly, the principal author of the 2000 report advocating aggressive U.S. military policies, holds a master’s degree from the Nitze School.
SAIS is also home to foreign policy behemoth Zbigniew Brzezinski, the author of a 1997 book foretelling current U.S. conflicts with Iraq and terrorists called The Grand Chessboard. Brzezinski, a trustee of the Trilateral Commission and a member the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, is billed by SAIS as a Robert E. Osgood professor of American foreign policy.
PNAC member Elliot Abrams is a former Assistant Secretary of State who was a major player in the Iran–Contra scandal of the 1980s. He was convicted of several felony offenses including lying to Congress but was later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush.
Abrams has recently served on the U.S. Commission on Religious Freedom and was appointed to the NSC staff position several months into George W. Bush’s tenure. Given his controversial background, it was widely known that Abrams would never have survived a Senate confirmation hearing for a deputy or assistant secretary position at either the Department of Defense or State Department.
‘RICHARD’S STRING OF PERLES’
Richard Perle is another key Bush policy maker at the center of the administration’s push toward war with Iraq. He is the Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, which reports policy recommendations to Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
Perle was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy during both terms of the Reagan Administration. He has been a frequent contributor to national media publications and television programs.
He is also a resident fellow of the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank which has a member list that reads like a who’s who of conservative politicians, academics, and policy makers.
Some contend Perle is a major puller of defense policy strings. Jude Wanniski, an analyst who focuses on the politics of “supply-side economics,” claims Perle controls the “brass” of the Bush Administration’s defense policy team – Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby, and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.
“It is a badge of honor among the Warrior Class to be identified as one of Richard’s String of Perles,” Wanniski wrote in a memo posted on his Polycomomics, Inc. website.
Two PNAC men cited by Wanniski as faithful Perlites are William Kristol and Frank Gaffney.
Gaffney is a Washington Times columnist and a contributor to Defense News and Investor’s Business Daily. During the Reagan Administration, he was an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Perle.
Gaffney, who holds a Master’s Degree from Johns Hopkins’ SAIS, is the founder and president of yet another think tank known as the Center for Security Policy.
Conservative commentator Kristol is the editor of The Weekly Standard magazine and a frequent pundit on TV news programs. He is also the PNAC chairman and, according to Wanniski, part of a network of opinion makers who answer to Perle. Kristol’s network consists of many editorial page writers and journalists for national publications and television programs.
The vast majority of PNAC’s money comes from funds forwarded through the New Citizenship Project, another organization founded by Kristol. Watchgroup Media Transparency reports PNAC has received a total of $600,000 between the organization’s founding in 1997 and 2000.
The New Citizenship Project is primarily funded by grants from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. All are conservative philanthropic non-profits.
Tim Barker, FTW Staff, contributed to this report.
Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg, the lone whistleblower among the Satmar, a powerful Hasidic sect, who recently was the victim of a bleach attack in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. All photos by Christian Storm.
Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg – who is 63 with a long, graying beard – recently sat down with me to explain what he described as a “child-rape assembly line” among sects of fundamentalist Jews. He cleared his throat. “I’m going to be graphic,” he said.
A member of Brooklyn’s Satmar Hasidim fundamentalist branch of Orthodox Judaism, Nuchem designs and repairs mikvahs in compliance with Torah Law. The mikvah is a ritual Jewish bathhouse used for purification. Devout Jews are required to cleanse themselves in the mikvah on a variety of occasions: Women must visit following menstruation, and men have to make an appearance before the High Holidays, such as Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Many of the devout also purify themselves before and after the act of sex and before the Sabbath.
On a visit to Jerusalem in 2005, Rabbi Rosenberg entered into a mikvah in one of the holiest neighborhoods in the city, Mea She’arim. “I opened a door that entered into a schvitz,” he told me. “Vapors everywhere, I can barely see. My eyes adjust, and I see an old man, my age, long white beard, a holy-looking man, sitting in the vapors. On his lap, facing away from him, is a boy, maybe seven years old. And the old man is having anal sex with this boy.”
Rabbi Rosenberg paused, gathered himself, and went on: “This boy was speared on the man like an animal, like a pig, and the boy was saying nothing. But on his face – fear. The old man [looked at me] without any fear, as if this was common practice. He didn’t stop. I was so angry, I confronted him. He removed the boy from his penis, and I took the boy aside. I told this man, ‘It’s a sin before God, a mishkovzucher. What are you doing to this boy’s soul? You’re destroying this boy!’ He had a sponge on a stick to clean his back, and he hit me across the face with it. ‘How dare you interrupt me!’ he said. I had heard of these things for a long time, but now I had seen.”
The child sex abuse crisis in ultra-Orthodox Judaism, like that in the Catholic Church, has produced its share of shocking headlines in recent years. In New York, and in the prominent Orthodox communities of Israel and London, allegations of child molestation and rape have been rampant. The alleged abusers are schoolteachers, rabbis, fathers, uncles – figures of male authority. The victims, like those of Catholic priests, are mostly boys. Rabbi Rosenberg believes around half of young males in Brooklyn’s Hasidic community – the largest in the United States and one of the largest in the world – have been victims of sexual assault perpetrated by their elders. Ben Hirsch, director of Survivors for Justice, a Brooklyn organization that advocates for Orthodox sex abuse victims, thinks the real number is higher. “From anecdotal evidence, we’re looking at over 50 percent. It has almost become a rite of passage.”
Ultra-Orthodox Jews who speak out about these abuses are ruined and condemned to exile by their own community. Dr. Amy Neustein, a nonfundamentalist Orthodox Jewish sociologist and editor of Tempest in the Temple: Jewish Communities and Child Sex Scandals, told me the story of a series of Hasidic mothers in Brooklyn she got to know who complained that their children were being preyed on by their husbands.
In these cases, the accused men “very quickly and effectively engage the rabbis, the Orthodox politicians, and powerful Orthodox rabbis who donate handsomely to political clubs.” The goal, she told me, is “to excise the mother from the child’s life.” Rabbinical courts cast the mothers aside, and the effects are permanent. The mother is “amputated.” One woman befriended by Dr. Neustein, a music student at a college outside New York, lost contact with all six of her children, including an infant she was breastfeeding at the time of their separation.
Rabbi Rosenberg inspects a ritual purification bath, known as a mikvah. In 2005, he witnessed a young boy being raped inside a similar bath.
Seven years ago, Rabbi Rosenberg started blogging about sex abuse in his community and opened a New York City hotline to field sex abuse complaints. He has posted appeals on YouTube, appeared on CNN, and given speeches across the US, Canada, Israel, and Australia. Today, he is the lone whistleblower among the Satmar. For this he is reviled, slandered, hated, feared. He receives death threats on a regular basis. In Yiddish and Hebrew newspapers, advertisements taken out by the self-described “great rabbis and rabbinical judges of the city of New York” have denounced him as “a stumbling block for the House of Israel,” “a public rebuker and preacher of ethics” who “persists in his rebelliousness” and whose “voice has been heard among many Jewish families, especially young people in their innocence… drawn to listen to his poisonous and revolting speeches.” Leaflets distributed in Williamsburg and Borough Park, the centers of ultra-Orthodoxy in Brooklyn, display his bearded face over the body of a writhing snake. “Corrupt Informer,” reads one of the leaflets, followed by the declaration that Rabbi Rosenberg’s “name should rot in hell forever. They should cut him off from all four corners of the earth.”
When Rabbi Rosenberg wants to bathe at a mikvah in Brooklyn to purify himself, none will have him. When he wants to go to synagogue, none will have him. “He is finished in the community, butchered,” said a fellow rabbi who would only talk anonymously. “No one will look at him, and those who will talk to him, they can’t let it be known. The pressure in our community, it’s incredible.”
The powerful men – and it is worth noting that this community is regulated by men only – who govern the world of ultra-Orthodox Judaism would rather their adherents be blind in their faith, their eyes closed to the horrors Rabbi Rosenberg is exposing. Like the Catholic establishment, the rabbinate seeks to cover up the crimes, quiet the victims, protect the abusers, and deflect potential criticism of their institutional practices. Those who speak out are vilified, and the faithful learn to shut their mouths. When the father of the seven-year-old boy whom Rabbi Rosenberg rescued from the Jerusalem bathhouse showed up to collect his son, he couldn’t believe his son had been raped. Trembling, terrified, he whisked his son away to get medical help but was still too scared to raise a formal complaint. According to Ben and Survivors for Justice, “The greatest sin is not the abuse, but talking about the abuse. Kids and parents who step forward to complain are crushed.”
As for Rabbi Rosenberg, when he voiced his concerns to the rabbinate in Israel, he was brought up on charges by the mishmeres hatznuis, the archconservative Orthodox “modesty squad,” which regulates, often through threats of violence, proper moral conduct and dress in the relations between men and women. The modesty squad is a sort of Jewish Taliban. According to Rabbi Rosenberg, the rapist he caught in the act was a member of the modesty squad, which charged him with the unconscionable offense of having previously been seen walking down a street in Jerusalem with a married woman. “But it’s OK to molest children,” he adds.
The abuse and its cover-up are symptoms of wider political dysfunction – or, more precisely, symptoms of socially disastrous political control by religious elites.
“This isn’t a problem about a few aberrant cases or an old-fashioned community reluctant to talk to police about sexual matters,” said Michael Lesher, a practicing Jew who has investigated Orthodox sex abuse and represented abuse victims. “This is about a political economy that links Orthodox Judaism with other fundamentalist creeds and with aspects of right-wing ideologies generally. It’s an economy in which genuine religious values will never really rise to the top, so long as they’re tied to the poisonous priorities that elevate status and power over the basic human needs of the most vulnerable among us.”
Michael, who is completing a book on the topic, noted that the infamous Rabbi Elior Chen, convicted in 2010 in what was arguably Israel’s worst case of serial child abuse, is still defended in public statements by leading ultra-Orthodox rabbis. Among other legal and moral crimes, the rabbi forced his victims to eat feces, claiming that this cruelty was necessary to “purify” the children he abused.
According to Ben, the ultra-Orthodox community has never been as repressive as it is today. The repression, as he describes it, stems from the burden of having too many children. Huge families are encouraged: Every child born to a Hasid is seen as “a finger in the eye of Hitler.” Ben also told me that the average family size among Williamsburg Hasidim is nine, and that some families include more than 15 children.
Mikvah Israel of Boro Park, one of the many mikvahs in Brooklyn that no longer accept Rabbi Rosenberg.
Families saddled with an increasing number of children soon enter into a cycle of poverty. There is simultaneously an extreme separation of the sexes, which is unprecedented in the history of the Hasidim. There is limited general education, to the point that most men in the community are educated only to the third grade, and receive absolutely no sexual education. No secular newspapers are allowed, and internet access is forbidden. “The men in the community are undereducated by design,” Ben said. “You have a community that has been infantilized. They have been trained not to think. It’s a sort of totalitarian control.”
The rabbis, dominating an ignorant and largely poverty-stricken flock, determine the fate of every individual in the community. Nothing is done without the consent of the rabbinical establishment. A man wants to buy a new car – he goes to the rabbi for counsel. A man wants to marry – the rabbi tells him whether or not he should marry a particular bride. As for the women, they don’t get to ask the rabbi anything. Their place is beneath contempt.
Michael told me that current Orthodox leadership, accruing wealth from the tithes of subservient followers, is “drifting to the right, politically as well as religiously.” Many rabbis in New York City have taken up the banner of neoliberalism. “Every English-language Orthodox publication I know embraced Romney during the 2012 elections, decried national health insurance, blamed liberals for bribing the lower classes,” he said. “In Orthodox society, just as in America at large, the financial mismatch between the elite and the rest of us is ominously large.”
Michael also notes that the problem is not confined to the extremists. “The same patterns of victim-blaming, covering up, idealizing the rabbis so that cover-ups aren’t even acknowledged, are found all across the spectrum of Orthodoxy,” he told me. “The Orthodox left was shamefully slow to react to Rabbi Baruch Lanner’s abuse or to the similar case of Rabbi Mordechai Elon.” Rabbi Lanner, a former New Jersey yeshiva high school principal, was found guilty in 2000 of sexually abusing dozens of teenage students over the decades of his tenure. Rabbi Elon, who had publicly denounced homosexuality, was convicted last August on two counts of forcible sexual assault on a male minor, following several years of reports of his abuse of young boys.
“I have children come to me with their parents, and the blood is coming out of the anus,” Rabbi Rosenberg told me when we met. “These are zombies for life. What are we to do?”
This of course is the key question, and no answers are forthcoming. Michael holds out little hope that the situation will change. “If Orthodox institutions continue on their current trajectory,” he said, “I’d say things could get worse before they get better.”
A few weeks after our interview, Rabbi Rosenberg was walking through the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn when an unidentified man rushed up behind him, tapped him on the shoulder, and threw a cup of bleach in his face. He went to the hospital with facial burns and was temporarily blinded. Such is the measure of justice among the Satmar that a once-respected rabbi, now amputated from the community, should find himself chemically burned on a street in a neighborhood considered holy.
Later Rabbi Rosenberg told me a story of being surrounded by young boys in Williamsburg. The boys cursed him, laughed at him, threatened him, and spat at him. He wondered how many of them would end up molested.