United States Marine Field McConnell claims his sister Kristine Marcy used Greek Life pedophile traps to extort the participation of Susan Rice (Phi Beta Kappa) in a man-in-the-middle propaganda attack with Paperclip passport holder Barry Soetoro (CUKC) who allegedly hacked the CIA Benghazi chain of command to watch the rape of late U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, in a Benghazi hospital on 9/11 2012.
“Wayne Madsen: Benghazi Attack, Another Fast & Furious [HSBC PitM attack] Gone Bad!”
Marcy allegedly linked Obama’s BlackBerry to Nortel’s JABS is support of 9/11 Pedophile in the Middle Attacks on U.S. Paperclip aliens.
“[Spoliation inference of pedophile entrapment and extortion of Petraeus by Kristine Marcy’s Paperclip twins] Beyond the call of duty: How Petraeus AND General Allen helped ‘unstable’ twin of Florida housewife at center of scandal with her bitter custody battle Natalie Khawam was described as ‘psychologically unstable’ by a judge, who ordered full custody of her son be given to her ex-husband Grayson Wolfe Petraeus and Allen are said to have written to the judge to have this overturned Khawam is also being sued in Montgomery County for failure to pay her lawyer’s fees Also accused of fraudulently omitting Rolex watches, sable mink furs and a diamond ring from her list of assets in the April bankruptcy By Rachel Quigley PUBLISHED:17:02 GMT, 13 November 2012| UPDATED:17:56 GMT, 13 November 2012 Disgraced ex-CIA chief David Petraeus and General John Allen both wrote letters in support of the ‘unstable’ twin sister of the ‘sweetheart’ sex scandal whistleblower as she battled in a bitter custody fight with her husband, it was revealed today. Divorced mother-of-one Natalie Khawam, 37, lives in the same $1.3million house in Tampa, Florida, with her sister Jill Kelley and cancer surgeon husband Scott. It emerged today that Petraeus and Allen wrote letters supporting the child-custody battle between Khawam – who was described as being ‘psychologically unstable’ – and her ex-husband Grayson Wolfe. The disclosure throws a spotlight on the judgement of the [extorted] men, two of the nation’s most powerful figures in national security, as to how far they fell into the thrall of the glamorous Kelley.”
BREAKING: The president knew the truth about Benghazi
By Jennifer Rubin
In a blockbuster report, John Solomon, the former Associated Press and Post reporter, has ferreted out the president’s daily brief that informed him within 72 hours of the Sept. 11 attack that the Benghazi attack was a jihadist operation.
Citing officials directly familiar with the information, Solomon writes in the Washington Guardian that Obama and other administration officials were told that “that the attack was likely carried out by local militia and other armed extremists sympathetic to al-Qaida in the region.”
The details from the CIA and Pentagon assessments of the killing of Ambassador Chris [Stevens] were far more specific, more detailed and more current than the unclassified talking points that UN Ambassador Susan Rice and other officials used five days after the attack to suggest to Americans that an unruly mob angry over an anti-Islamic video was to blame, officials said.
Most of the details affirming al-Qaida links were edited or excluded from the unclassified talking points used by Rice in appearances on news programs the weekend after the attack, officials confirmed Friday. Multiple agencies were involved in excising information, doing so because it revealed sources and methods, dealt with classified intercepts or involved information that was not yet fully confirmed, the officials said.
Solomon cautions that there were bits of evidence pointing to a spontaneous attack but, as Eli Lake of the Daily Beast and others have reported, he writes: “Among the early evidence cited in the briefings to the president and other senior officials were intercepts showing some of the participants were known members or supporters of Ansar al-Sharia — the al-Qaida-sympathizing militia in Libya — and the AQIM, which is a direct affiliate of al-Qaida in northern Africa, the officials said.”
How could the president and his senior staff then have allowed (or rather, sent) Rice to go out to tell an entirely different tale to the American people on Sept. 16 on five TV shows?
This report indicates that the president certainly knew that Benghazi wasn’t a rogue movie review gone bad. He had information that plainly spelled out what was later confirmed by additional intelligence. If this information was too confidential to share with the public, at the very least the president and others should not have mislead voters.
This is a full-blown scandal, and in light of this information, the press corps’s slothful indifference to uncovering the truth at Wednesday’s news conference with Obama is all the more shocking. It is time for the president to come clean. The scandal has now enveloped the Oval Office and will define his second term, if not resolved satisfactorily.
The irony of this is that Rice may well have been used as a patsy, unaware that she was sent out to spin a misleading tale. My colleague Dana Milbank recounts Rice’s long-standing inability to get along with others and to be circumspect in her pronouncements:
It’s true that, in her much-criticized TV performance, she was reciting talking points given to her by the intelligence agencies. But that’s the trouble. Rice stuck with her points even though they had been contradicted by the president of the Libyan National Assembly, who, on CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’ just before Rice, said there was “no doubt” that the attack on Americans in Benghazi “was preplanned.” Rice rebutted the Libyan official, arguing — falsely, it turned out — that there was no evidence of such planning. . . . Obama can do better at State than Susan Rice.
Frankly the same could be said of many national security positions at this point. The American people made their choice in November on the president, but it now appears they were duped regarding the real facts concerning Benghazi. What are we going to do about that?
Marriage, family, and early careerRice married Canadian-born ABC News producer Ian Officer Cameron in 1992 at theSt. Albans School chapel.. They met as students at Stanford. They have two children.
Rice served in the Clinton administration in various capacities: at the National Security Council from 1993 to 1997; as Director for International Organizations and Peacekeeping from 1993 to 1995; and as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for African Affairs from 1995 to 1997.
At the time of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide, Rice reportedly said, “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on theNovember [congressional] election?” Rice subsequently acknowledged the mistakes made at the time and felt that a debt needed repaying. The inability or failure of the Clinton administration to do anything about the genocide would inform her later views on possible military interventions. She would later say of the experience: “I swore to myself that if I ever faced such a crisis again, I would come down on the side of dramatic action, going down in flames if that was required.”
Rice supported the multinational force that invaded Zaire from Rwanda in 1996 and overthrew dictator Mobutu Sese Seko, saying privately that “Anything’s better than Mobutu.” Others[who?] criticized the U.S. complicity in the violation of the Congo’s borders as destabilizing and dangerous.
While the writings of Carney, Ijaz, Rose and Miniter each claim that Sudan offered to turn Bin Laden over to the US and that Rice was central in the decision not to accept the offer, The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States (the 9-11 Commission) concluded in part “Sudan’s minister of defense, Fatih Erwa, has claimed that Sudan offered to hand Bin Laden over to the United States. The Commission has found no credible evidence that this was so. Ambassador Carney had instructions only to push the Sudanese to expel Bin Laden. Ambassador Carney had no legal basis to ask for more from the Sudanese since, at the time, there was no indictment outstanding.”
On July 7, 1998, while serving as Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Rice was a member of an American delegation to visit detained Nigerian President-Elect Basorun M.K.O. Abiola. During this meeting, Abiola suffered a fatal heart attack [Yeah right]
On November 5, 2008, Rice was named to the advisory board of the Obama-Biden Transition Project[when Kristine Marcy allegedly gave her the Nortel JABS keys to manipulate al-Qaeda crime-scene timelines]
“http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/02/13/the-continued-rise-of-the-child-suicide-bomber/ The Continued Rise of the Child Suicide Bomber Children byCassandra Clifford | on February 13th, 2008 | 6 comments Suicide bombers have become a mainstay in today’s modern warfare, we have become hardened by their continual actions and rarely does one become shocked to see headlines like, “suicide bomber kills 11″. Modern suicide bombing began in the 1980’s during the Lebanese Civil War, and has since spread to more than 12 countries, including Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Palestine and Israel, with attacks in some 30 countries. The use of suicide bombers has dramatically increased since its modern beginnings in the 198o’s which saw an average of 4.7 attacks a year to 180 attacks a year in the first half of the 2000’s (The Moral Logic and Growth of Suicide Terrorism Fig. 1, p.128).
While suicide bombing incidents are now steadfastly becoming a weapon of modern warfare, these human bombs are most often not the sound and hungry disciples that their leaders and trainers portray in their rhetoric. Just this month two suicide bombers in Iraq where discovered to be mentally disabled, as following the deadly attack both bombers where revealed to have Downs Syndrome (Blasts in Iraq markets kill 91). Sadly the use of the disabled as suicide bombers is hardly an isolated case. A 2007 study in Afghanistan, found 80% of the suicide attackers had some kind of physical or mental disability (Disabled Often Carry Out Afghan Suicide Missions).
These are not heartless killers, but manipulated people who’s minds and bodies have been enslaved by the terror that is placed upon them over and over by those who see vengeance as a tool which wins battles. This misguided approach to warfare not only hinders the ability to win wars, but leaves countless victims that are manipulated into acts for which they do not understand the extent of their actions. Yes, it is true that many suicide bombers go forth with these acts of a sound mind and their own free will, but we must remember that what makes someone act in such a manner is still based on deception and misconception. However it is not these actors in which sends fear into society the most, it is the acts of mere children.
The use of child suicide bombers appears to be increasing, and while many children are educated and reared into this deadly fate, many are thankfully saved or removed before their actions have deadly consequences. Many have seen the images of infants and toddlers dressed in mock suicide bomber outfits in Palestine, and while they may not commit such acts when they grow-up, their fate is one undoubtedly leaning towards violence.
Many children are being taught the ways of suicide bombing in religious schools, others by their parents or other relatives, however it is the use of religious schools that are on the rise. In Pakistan this has been seen with the use `madrassah’ (seminary schools) as a source point of indoctrinating children into the life and death of a suicide bomber seems to be increasing. Rehma, her husband Shaukat fearfully removed their son Zarak from the seminary, and packed then moved the entire family away after they where shocked at his talk of suicide bombings and paradise (Child suicide bombers “victims of the most brutal exploitation”). In Pakistan the there were 56 suicide attacks in 2007 alone, a number which many fear will only rise in 2008.
The question of weather or not these children are terrorist or victims seems clear to manythey are victims of those who brainwash and lead them to this future less life. It is the cowards who prey on the innocent, never seeming to take action themselves, they just continue to spew this deadly rhetoric and watch as their victims take the lives of other innocent victims, that are the true terrorists.
Please see my previous posts on child suicide bombers here.”