An Introduction to GcMAF by Dr. David Noakes – Dr. Jeff Bradstreet Meets Dr. David Noakes – The Family of Jeff Bradstreet Breaks Silence – Big Pharma and the Cancer Scam – Congressional Testimony Given to Congress in 2002 by Dr. Jeff Bradstreet – Jeff Bradstreet: Suicide Was Completely Contrary to His Entire Life’s Work – 88 Peer-Reviewed Papers on the Vaccine/Autism Link – Is It Really All a “Giant Deadly Scam?”

Bradstreet Family Breaks Silence for First time on Beloved Dr. Jeff Bradstreet (RIP)

Dr James Bradstreet – How Close Are We To An Autism Cure? Part 1 
CASSAT 5 22 15 1 James Bradstreet 


Big Pharma & the Cancer Scam

“You are nothing more than a revenue stream!”

David Noakes

In the spring of 2009, David Noakes listened to a presentation in Ghent, Belgium on Codex Alimentarius by some guy called Ian R Crane. During the course of his presentation, Ian stated there was a little-known cure for cancer called GcMAF. After the talk, David went home and put it into Google. In those days, it was just 32 research papers by scientists; all of which claimed that GcMAF had produced remarkable results. David was horrified that, after 20 years, no one was making this remarkable product available to the general public. He resolved to stop fighting the EU, and attack cancer. With his four scientists and seven doctors, he has now supplied 9,000 patients, and 350 independent doctors and clinics.

GcMAF is a human protein all healthy people make that has 21 brilliant effects in the body including the most powerful seven attacks on cancer known to man. Needless to say, it has no side effects.

David’s little company, Immuno Biotech Ltd, has now also written 31 research papers, peer-reviewed and published in prestigious scientific journals. His results are truly astonishing!

Needless to say, David and Immuno Biotech Ltd have been under sustained attack from Big Pharma. The problem is that this protein, which is a human body part and a Human Right for all of us, is inexpensive, effective and a threat to, for example, the poison of chemotherapy, which costs £40,000 a round.

It’s the fact it works that makes it a target.

GcMAF Introduction
Cancer cells destroyed by First Immune GcMAF ( 

Pharma Murders

If vaccines don’t cause brain damage, why is GlaxoSmithKline paying out $63 million to vaccine victims?

The fraud surrounding the MMR vaccine and Merck, its manufacturer, is becoming a story way too hot to handle – See more at: (read comments)

How Merck destroyed Dr Andrew Wakefield for telling the truth:

PlOS ONE Research Paper confirms Dr Wakefield’s findings in 2013:

PUBLISHED: July 31, 2015

GcMaf: the billion-pound industry the States is throwing away

Most of my ‘scientifically deluded opinions’ are not my opinions. They are the opinions of 180 scientists from eight nations who have written GcMaf research papers. Scientists have also peer-reviewed 32 scientific research papers, written by Guernsey’s Immuno Biotech Ltd (more than any other company in Guernsey’s history), 10 with my name on them, and published them in a dozen of the world’s top scientific journals.

We report 70% success in reversing terminal stage four cancer, the highest rate in the world. So this mysterious writer’s views do not seem to be shared by the scientific community. May I please ask how many scientific research papers that writer has had published?

Indeed, should a human protein, that exists in billionths of a gram, tried and tested by five billion humans, and a human right, be regulated by governments? (We do have a human right to all our own body parts.)

Governments commit 95% of all crime – the invasion of Iraq on the basis of lies about weapons of mass destruction we knew did not exist, 1.5 million dead (and ISIS born as a result), the abolition of the nation of Britain after 3,500 years by the EU’s Lisbon Treaty, the worst act of high treason ever committed by that government, and done without the consent of its people.

And governments license medicines that kill over a million people every year. In England the MHRA closes down new discoveries, like GcMAF. A dozen reports by Parliament, the Lancet, BBC Panorama confirm this – you can read them. Is the MHRA really the organisation your writer wants controlling their body parts and licensing them as drugs?

The writer asked me to tell: at what mass should we start regulating? The Germans don’t license down to billionths of a gram. They license 98% only, on the basis that if the last 2% was arsenic, it’s too small to do harm.

So on the contrary, size is very relevant. Our Goleic is licensed in the EU – something HSSD studiously ignores. The writer states that ‘the opinion autism is caused by the MMR vaccine’ was contained in a research paper retracted 15 years ago. No, there are scores of papers and medical opinions stating the MMR vaccine causes autism.

Italian courts pay out a fixed 180,000 euros to parents whose child had MMR and contracted autism. Courts in the USA pay more. Half of the 355 autism mums who filled out our questionnaire volunteered the autism came on within two weeks of the MMR jab – and we didn’t mention MMR.

The MMR drug corporations pay fortunes to fund marketing, blogsites, ‘charities’ and articles to argue the opposite. With no evidence, the writer considers our autism treatment ‘harmful and potentially ineffective’. Even the MHRA has confirmed GcMAF has no side-effects.

Through doctors, we’ve treated 3,500 kids with autism. Through our own seven doctors, using GcMAF and ultrasonography, we now get 60% to recover to the point they can go to normal school. All these results are meticulously documented. Where’s the harm in that?

We made the most major discovery in autism, the point in the human brain which represents autism. It’s in the subarachnoid space and is 3.4mm thick in children with autism, 1mm thick in everyone else.

We published it in a scientific research paper: ‘A new methodology of viewing extra-axial fluid and cortical abnormalities in children with autism via transcranial ultrasonography’ in the Human Neuroscience Journal.

We are the world’s leading scientific and medical authority on GcMAF.

The States of Guernsey remains completely duninterested in the brilliant scientific achievements of Immuno Biotech, and by closing us down, has thrown away a billion-pound industry in which Guernsey could have cured the world of cancer and had the best reputation on earth.

People keep telling me this is the worst States we’ve ever had.

David Noakes, CEO
Immuno Biotech Ltd
Fort George

This is exceptional testimony given by Doctor Jeff Bradstreet as a professional witness before a House committee hearing on vaccine safety on June 6, 2002.  His testimony starts around page 15 of this hearing transcript. Jeff Bradstreet’s son had a vaccine-induced autistic response, and it is alleged his stepson is autistic. Dr. Bradstreet is far from a quack that the media has portrayed him as being. Jeff Bradstreet was an expert witness as revealed by his brother and sister-in-law in the interview above. The testimony of Doctor Andrew Wakefield is also in this testimony with this partial testimony reproduced here:

“Let me turn now to the current state of the science. The association between MMR vaccine autism and intestinal inflammation was first suggested by my group on the inspiration of parents from the Royal Free Hospital Medical School in 1998 in a paper published in The Lancet. This is well known to you.

The same research team in collaboration with Professor John O’Leary and Dr. Simon Murch, a pediatric gastroenterologist from the Royal Free Hospital have since shown in a comprehensive series of what were 8 and now 10 peer-reviewed scientific studies that the major findings of our original study were indeed correct. These papers are listed in the appendix. The papers are here and I will make them available to anyone who wishes to read them.”

JZ Sell–aa.33467.22; Fed Clearance Candidate ID 3770771. 06/19/2002 Political Transcripts by Federal Document Clearing House (Copy right 2002 by Federal Document Clearing House Inc.)

This is the same hearing transcript in text format:


Autism: Dr Jeff Bradstreet in First Immune GcMAF’s ( laboratory

Richie Allen interviews Doctor David Noakes:

David Noakes: “UK Drug Safety Agency Responsible For Thousands Of Deaths Each Year!”

This article appeared at 
Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam

Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:
“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ‘Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.'”
Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”

Please go to the The Daily Sheeple to read the entire article.

This article appeared 
at Global Research

August 25, 2015

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is aiding and abetting criminal companies

There are various solutions to this ongoing catastrophe that would depend on the basic honesty of Big Pharma. That honesty doesn’t exist. And the Dept. of Justice has no interest in waging a big-time war against Pharma.

Even in a society where Libertarian philosophy was the guide, government, however limited, would still have the role of protecting citizens from poisoning and rank fraud.

You could, of course, completely eliminate the government from having any say-so in the approval of medical drugs. You could have the Wild West. Let the buyer beware. Whether this would result in more deaths per year is an open question. It’s quite possible such a free system would eventually make people more cautious about what drugs they ingest; and thus the number of deaths would diminish. People wouldn’t be able to rely on the government to tell them what’s safe and what’s dangerous. In the long, long run, I believe this is so: no FDA is better than FDA.

I’ve been writing and speaking about dangerous medical drugs for almost 30 years, and I haven’t seen any limits placed on the basic FDA-Pharma partnership. This isn’t case of seeing a) government or b) corporations as the basic criminal. They’re both criminals, in collaboration with each other.

In a half-sane society, the big drug companies would have been prosecuted to the sky long ago. Their charters to do business in any state would have been revoked. Their CEOs, executives, and scientists would have been put behind bars for life. Even a limited federal government would have done that.

Here is where I’m in accord with Libertarians: people have the right and the freedom to refuse medication, under any circumstances, even where the experts claim death will be the inevitable outcome. And people have the right to ingest any compounds they decide might help them.

If that were the basis for the system, then government couldn’t overwhelm the population with rules about mandatory vaccines (see also) and drugs.

In case you hadn’t noticed, all national health insurance plans, in whatever countries they’ve been established, are the road to perdition, because they can be manipulated to coerce citizens into accepting designated toxic medical treatments.

The freedom of refusal is the only protection when crime bosses rule both government agencies (like the FDA) and pharmaceutical companies.

Trying to reform Pharma or the government is a losing proposition.

In countries other than the US, the FDA-type agencies are likewise stacked with Pharma-favoring allies. These people have no conscience and no accountability. They are dangerous criminals who should be locked up.

But how is that possible when they are embedded within government?

If benign UFOs from another solar system were stationed above Earth, observing civilization at work, one of the first things they would notice is the mass-poisoning operation I’m writing about in this article, especially because it is taking place under the cover of delivering health to the planet’s population.

Someone aboard one of the ships would say, “Oh yes, this is a typical ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ cover story, concealing a war against the people. We see that everywhere.”

Save the village by destroying it.

If you want a clue about the FDA’s brazen attitude, search the phrase, “FDA why learn about adverse drug reactions.” You’ll find a page where the FDA readily admits, in capital letters, that 100,000 people die every year from the effects of medical drugs. (The page was still there the last time I checked.) Yet the FDA, the sole government agency responsible for certifying these drugs as safe and effective before they can be prescribed, takes zero responsibility for the death toll.

You would think this is a major story for mainstream media, to say the least. But you would be wrong.

A million deaths per decade doesn’t register on their radar, because they are in bed with the drug companies and the FDA.

There are several sources for the 100,000 death statistic in this article. The primary citation is: Dr. Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000, “Is US health really the best in the world?” Not long before her death, I interviewed Dr. Starfield. She told me no US government agency had ever contacted her about her findings.

Why would the federal government get in touch with her? It would be tantamount to confessing to mass murder.

Copyright © Jon Rappoport, Activist Post, 2015


Further reading:

86 Research Papers Supporting the Vaccine/Autism Link

ZERO U.S. Measles Deaths in 10 Years, but Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths Reported

Gardasil linked to deaths and disabilities after young girls vaccinated: Toronto Star investigation

How the Government has Earned $3.5 BILLION from the Claim that Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism

Andrew J. Wakefield, MB, BS, FRCS, FRCPath; Mark Blaxill, MBA; Boyd Haley, PhD; Anissa Ryland; Daniel Hollenbeck, BS; Jane Johnson; James Moody, JD; Carol Stott, PhD (398 KB)

Why Don’t Amish Children Get Autism?

Additional related information on Doctor Jeff Bradstreet’s death:

Jeffrey Bradstreet’s murder solved!

784 Total Views 2 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post

  • Notice the breitling replica packaging and tags. Absolute Louis Vuitton packaging is comfortable and secure. Dust covers, intricately advised cases for sunglasses and Louis Vuitton tags throughout and central the absolute section are standard. Affected Louis Vuitton items accept bare tags, afterwards the name or logo, and are about packaged in bargain artificial or tissue paper. Examine the book on the central of the sunglasses. Absolute Louis Vuitton sunglasses accept centered, analogously formed lettering, logo and signatures. The lettering, signatures and archetypal cast on affected Louis Vuitton sunglasses is about high, slanted or becomes aside due to asperous ink against the end of the line. Open and abutting the sunglasses. The rolex replica absolute sunglasses should accessible and abutting smoothly, afterwards activity billowing or rickety. Affected Louis Vuitton sunglasses are fabricated with individual adapter screws, feel annealed or accessory accessible calmly to announce poor quality. Examine the arrangement symmetry. On accurate Louis Vuitton sunglasses, the pattern-engraved metal band over the lens is altogether symmetrical, alpha and catastrophe with the aforementioned design. Affected Louis Vuitton sunglasses affectation alone fractional shapes, asymmetric patterns or alpha and end with altered shapes. Designer handbags are a big allotment of the appearance world. They arise with a top amount tag, but hermes replica can be an investment if you plan to accumulate the bag for a continued time. If purchasing a artist bag, accomplish abiding that you get what you're paying for. Do not get scammed into battery out a ton of banknote for a artist actor Gucci purse. You can use some simple tips to acquaint if your accepted Gucci purse is accurate or to save yourself a lot of altercation on your next arcade trip. Look central the bag at the autogenous label. All Gucci accoutrements are fabricated in Italy. If the purse is fabricated in any added place, it is a fake. Think logically about the price. The boilerplate amount of the Gucci Joy Medium Boston Bag is over $700, as of 2011. If anyone is aggravating to advertise you this bag new for $200, it is acceptable not authentic. Be abreast about the appraisement bazaar for the accoutrements that you desire. While accepting an accurate new Coach bag for $200 is a reality, accepting a cast new Gucci purse for this amount is not. Examine the logo on a cipher bag. The Gucci logo is two letter Gs, about touching, with one upside down. Any added hodgepodge of belletrist indicates a replica bag. Smell, blow and feel the handles. The handles and any brim should be 18-carat leather. Any signs of poor workmanship, such as cracking, or any handles that are acutely fabricated of artificial or pleather are signs of a affected bag. Look at the stitching. The bond should be absolute on a absolute Gucci purse with no accidental accoutrement bustling out. Make abiding your bag has a controllato agenda inside. These cards are Gucci's adaptation of an analysis sticker, and one is issued with every accurate bag. The chat Gucci should arise on your agenda in all basic letters. Louis Vuitton, a affluence architect of clothing, accoutrements and shoes, was founded in Paris in 1854 as a maker of accomplished covering luggage. Today the close is acclaimed common for its big-ticket appurtenances that buck the acclaimed "LV" monogram. Owning a Louis Vuitton bag guarantees that you acquire a accurate archetype of accomplished covering goods. If an abhorrent that appears to that appears to that appears to smell is central the bag, ridding yourself of the louis vuitton replica odor is easy.