#2762: Serco Sisters’ Hebdo JABS – Clinton’s 8(a) BleachBit Server – Baginski Zulu Spot
United States Marine Field McConnell
Plum City Online – (AbelDanger.net)
August 27, 2016
1. Abel Danger (AD) claims that Serco equipped The Sisters – the feminist custodians of a USIS kill list – with Nortel’s Joint Automated Booking System (JABS) to stand down security at Charlie Hebdo’s Paris HQ for a snuff-film attack on 7 January 2015.
2. AD claims that Serco ordered its 8(a) protégé company Base One Technologies (formed Feb 15, 1994, State Department file #1795583) to BleachBit Hillary Clinton’s server and destroy evidence of the Sisters’ use of JABS for snuff-film murders which they falsely attribute to ISIS.
3. AD claims that Serco’s National Security Advisor (NSA) Maureen Baginski used JABS to spot fix the Charlie Hebdo deaths in Zulu time so the pay-to-play donors to the Clinton Foundation, including various Saudi princelings, could scoop the death-bet pot.
4.United States Marine Field McConnell offers to show Donald Trump how to bring Sisters with custody of the USIS kill list and the JABS third party logistics system to justice for snuff-film murders falsely attributed to foreign terrorist groups since 1996.
“Digital Fires Instructor Serco – Camp Pendleton, CA Uses information derived from all military disciplines (e.g., aviation, ground combat, command and control, combat service support, intelligence, and opposing forces) to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action.”
“Serco awarded new European External Action Service IT contract Serco has secured a new service contract to deliver a central management service for ITclassified systems. The services will be delivered in Brussels with all staff executing the service holding security clearance up to ‘Secret UE’ level to access the classified zones. The duration of the contract is 4 years and it is valued at 9,000,000 EUR. The European External Action Service is the European Union’s diplomatic corps. It supports the EU foreign affairs chief (High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton) in conducting the common foreign and security policy. It has Delegations around the world working on behalf of the people of Europe and representing the EU as a whole. The EEAS manages the EU’s response to crises, has intelligence capabilities and cooperates with the European Commission in areas which it shares competence with.”
“Court Escorting and Custody Services Serco’s Prisoner Escort and Custody Services contract for London and the East of England makes a critical contribution to the Criminal Justice System in England & Wales, by ensuring the safe, secure and decent transport of prisoners between courts and their associated prisons and police stations and the effective operation of court custody suites and associated docks. The current PECS contract was awarded in March 2011 and commenced operations on 29 August, for a period of 7 years ending on 28 August 2018. Our service delivery model is an unincorporated joint venture with Wincanton PLC, a European leader in supply chain solutions and fleet management. … We escort on average 24,000 prisoners per month and operate from 7 vehicle bases across London and East of England, 5 of which are Wincanton sites.”
“2015 attack On 7 January 2015, two Islamist gunmen forced their way into the Paris headquarters of Charlie Hebdo and opened fire, killing twelve: staff cartoonists Charb, Cabu, Honoré, Tignous and Wolinski, economist Bernard Maris, editors Elsa Cayat and Mustapha Ourrad, guest Michel Renaud, maintenance worker Frédéric Boisseau and police officers Brinsolaro and Merabet, and wounding eleven, four of them seriously.
During the attack, the gunmen shouted “Allahu akbar” (“God is great” in Arabic) and also “the Prophet is avenged”. PresidentFrançois Hollande described it as a “terrorist attack of the most extreme barbarity”. The two gunmen were identified as Saïd Kouachiand Chérif Kouachi, French Muslim brothers of Algerian descent.”
“Charlie Hebdo attack anniversary rekindles criticism of security services
New books and documentaries question French authorities’ response to 7 January attacks and examine possible intelligence failings
Angelique Chrisafis in Paris
Monday 4 January 2016
15.49 GMT Last modified on Monday 4 January 201622.00 GMT
The first anniversary of terrorist attacks on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a Paris kosher supermarket is being marked by ongoing questions and criticisms over security failings.
The families of some of the 17 people who died in the 7 January attacks have reiterated concerns about whether police protection should have been higher for Charlie Hebdo, which had been a prominent target since it published cartoons of the prophet Muhammad in 2006 and whose previous offices were firebombed in 2011.
A number of books and documentaries to be released during several days of official commemorations this week question the French authorities’ response to the attacks and examine potential intelligence failings relating to the three gunmen. Brothers Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, who attacked the magazine’s offices, and Amédy Coulibaly, who held hostages at the kosher supermarket, all had known links to extremist terrorist networks and yet were not under full surveillance.
Maryse Wolinski, a journalist and widow of the cartoonist Georges Wolinski, who was killed in the Charlie Hebdo attack, said the fact that 130 people were killed in fresh attacks on Paris 10 months later made the security questions even more harrowing. Wolinksi will publish a book this week, Darling, I’m Going to Charlie (the last words her husband said to her), in which she asks why the police protection of the magazine’s office and its staff had been relaxed in the months before the attacks.
The police car that had been permanently stationed outside the magazine’s office had been removed and replaced with foot patrols. “I was angry to hear the police van outside had disappeared the November [before the attacks]. There was no fixed guard, no more barriers,” Wolinski told Europe 1 radio. She said the gunmen had been given an “extraordinary” opportunity to carry out the attacks. “I’m trying to understand why.”
Wolinski said November’s attacks on the national stadium, Paris bars and the Bataclan concert hall, which is only a few hundred metres from Charlie Hebdo, had increased her outrage at the authorities. “My anger grew because I realised they hadn’t learned the lessons,” she said.
In a documentary on France 2 television, the widow of Franck Brinsolaro, the police protection officer for the Charlie Hebdo, editor Charb, who was killed with him during the attacks, says he had told her the threat had been underestimated.
“Franck knew if there was an attack, the [attackers] would be heavily armed and he would stand no chance,” Ingrid Brinsolaro says. “I think that those in charge should say that the threat was underestimated and the means weren’t put in place. I think they owe him that, they owe my children that.” She was still waiting for answers from the French interior minister. The documentary also shows the confusion following the first 999 call which came after the gunmen, struggling to find the right entrance to the building, shot a maintenance man 10 minutes before they opened fire at Charlie Hebdo’s editorial meeting.
Although the address was in the Yellow Pages and printed in the weekly magazine, it was not on police files, so the connection was not initially made to the publication or to a potential terrorist attack.
The film shows that even in initial crisis meetings in the special interior ministry bunker, rivalries between French intelligence services were so bad that the interior minister had to order them to share information. Le Monde gained access to declassified documents detailing the surveillance of the three gunmen from 2011 until the attacks, and described “a succession of missed opportunities” that resulted in tabs not being kept on the men.
As the investigation continues, several key questions remain, including whether there were accomplices and who masterminded and coordinated the attacks. These issues are even more pertinent in the wake of the November attacks, which were carried by several known jihadiss who were able to return from Syria unnoticed.
The French president, François Hollande, who is now styling himself as a father-of-the-nation and protector figure, will lead the commemorations this week, including giving a speech to security forces and unveiling plaques.
The largest public ceremony will take place on the Place de la République in Paris, where a commemorative oak tree will be planted and the French rocker Johnny Hallyday will perform a song written about the aftermath of the attacks.
On Wednesday, 1 million copies of a special anniversary edition of Charlie Hebdo will reach newsstands in France.”
“Meeting in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2011
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and EU Foreign Affairs & Security Policy High Rep./European Commission VP Catherine Ashton discussed a number of issues of common concern, including the situations in Libya, Syria, Egypt and Belarus. Following their meeting, Secretary of State Clinton and High Representative Ashton signed a Framework Agreement between the US and the EU, which provides a legal framework for US civilians to participate in EU crisis management missions.”
“Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
Aug. 25 2016, 7:42 a.m. ….
That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president. The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.”
WASHINGTON, DC — Attorney General Janet Reno presented Hammer Awards to three employee working groups from Justice Department components as part of the Department’s “Justice Performance Review Lab Day,” an event showcasing the achievements of the Department’s 16 reinvention labs.
The Hammer Award is Vice President Gore’s special recognition to teams of employees which made significant contributions in support of the President’s National Performance Review (NPR) principles of improving customer service, cutting red tape, empowering employees, and getting back to basics.
“By accepting the challenge to re-invent government, these employees are making government more efficient and improving the way we perform our public responsibilities,” Reno said during theLab Day event in the Justice Department’s Great Hall. Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, who also attended, noted that the employees “have taken the concept of creating a government that works better and costs less and have made it a reality.”
The three Justice Department teams receiving the award are:
• The SENTRI Reinvention Lab, for developing a secure, high-tech, automated border inspection system at Otay Mesa, California;
• The Joint Automated Booking System (JABS) Lab, a multi-component effort which has significantly improved the prisoner booking process;
• The Justice Prisoner Alien Transportation System (JPATS), which combines the resources of several DOJ components to schedule[murder for hire] and transport prisoners more quickly, safely, and economically. Additional information on the awardees is attached. 96-523 ###”
“Byron York: Hillary Clinton BleachBits her past
BYRON YORK (@BYRONYORK) • 8/25/16 11:06 PM
While Hillary Clinton was preparing to deliver a big speech portraying Donald Trump as a racist, a figure from Clinton’s recent unhappy past — Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi — added a new word to the 25-year vocabulary of Clinton scandals: BleachBit.
That is the name of a publicly-available utility used to delete material from a computer’s hard disk. And it’s not just for casual, quickie deletes of junk mail. It’s for when a user really wants to destroy material on a computer so that no one will be able to recover it.
According to Gowdy, BleachBit is what Clinton and her legal team used, or at least part of what her team used, to destroy the 30,000 or so emails on her secret system that she deemed “personal” from her years as secretary of state. On Thursday, after revelations that the FBI had perhaps worked its way around BleachBit to discover an additional 14,900 emails that Clinton did not hand over, Gowdy went on Fox News to discuss both that development and the FBI documents that underlay the Justice Department’s decision not to prosecute Clinton for mishandling classified information.
The public should be allowed to see those currently classified FBI documents, Gowdy said, adding that he has reviewed them all. If people were allowed to read the papers, Gowdy explained, they might well come away with questions about the wisdom of the FBI’s decision.
“I read every word of all of the witness interviews,” Gowdy told Fox. “My takeaway was this: Remember James Comey said [Clinton] was not indicted because he didn’t have sufficient evidence on the issue of intent. I didn’t see any questions on the issue of intent.”
And then there were those deleted emails. First, it’s long been known that Clinton and her lawyers — and no independent arbiter — decided what to hand over and what to destroy. Clinton famously explained that she destroyed only the emails that dealt with personal issues, like yoga or her daughter Chelsea’s wedding. But in light of new revelations about the close relationship between Clinton’s Secretary of State office and the Clinton Foundation, a question gaining urgency in recent days is whether Clinton destroyed foundation-related emails on the grounds that they were “personal.”
“That’s the $100 million question,” Gowdy told Fox’s Martha MacCallum. “I hope somebody in your line of work will ask [Clinton]: Did you consider foundation emails to be personal or work r elated? I have yet to see a single foundation email produced by the State Department that was sent by her.” Gowdy went on to reveal a few details about how Clinton destroyed the documents she did not want anyone to see. “If she considered them to be personal, then she and her lawyers had those emails deleted,” Gowdy said. “They didn’t just push the delete button. They had them deleted where even God can’t read them.”
“They were using something called BleachBit,” Gowdy continued. “You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or for bridesmaid’s emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.” Amid growing controversy over the Clinton Foundation, possible conflicts of interest, and allegations of access and pay-to-play, Gowdy’s words served to return the focus to what the New York Times’ Mark Landler recently called the “original sin” of the Clinton email affair: Clinton took it upon herself to decide which of her emails as Secretary of State would be preserved, and which would be destroyed.
“There wasn’t an independent authority that got to make that decision,” Landler said on NPR’s “Diane Rehm Show” Wednesday. “And by the time we found out about it, those emails were gone.”
With the help of BleachBit, we now know.
“Opened in 1994 as the successor to the Transitional Immigrant Visa Processing Center in Rosslyn, Va., the NVC centralizes all immigrant visa pre-processing and appointment scheduling for overseas posts. The NVC collects paperwork and fees before forwarding a case, ready for adjudication, to the responsible post.
The center also handles immigrant and fiancé visa petitions, and while it does not adjudicate visa applications, it provides technical assistance and support to visa-adjudicating consular officials overseas.
Only two Foreign Service officers, the director and deputy director, work at the center, along with just five Civil Service employees. They work with almost 500 contract employees doing preprocessing of visas, making the center one of the largest employers in the Portsmouth area.
The contractor, Serco, Inc., has worked with the NVC since its inception and with the Department for almost 18 years.
The NVC houses more than 2.6 million immigrant visa files, receives almost two million pieces of mail per year and received more than half a million petitions from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) in 2011. Its file rooms’ high-density shelves are stacked floor-to-ceiling with files, each a collection of someone’s hopes and dreams and each requiring proper handling. ….
The NVC also preprocesses the chief of mission (COM) application required for the filing of a petition for a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV). Such visas, for foreign nationals who have performed services for the U.S. government in Iraq and Afghanistan, require COM concurrence before the applicant can file a petition with USCIS. The NVC collects the requisite documents from such applicants and, when complete, forwards the package to the U.S. embassies in Baghdad or Kabul for COM approval”
“Serco Inc., a provider of professional, technology, and management services to the federal government, announced today that Maureen Baginski has been named Vice President of the intelligence business and National Security Advisor at Serco. Ms. Baginski has a distinguished background with almost three decades of service in the United States Intelligence Community.
Most recently, Ms. Baginski was President of the National Security Systems Sector for Sparta Inc. and prior to that a Director in Bearing Point’s Intelligence Sector. She also served on SI International’s Board of Directors until it was acquired by Serco in December 2009.
From 2003 to 2005, Ms. Baginski served as the FBI’s Executive Assistant Director for Intelligence where she was responsible for establishing and managing the FBI’s first-ever intelligence program. Her mission was to adapt FBI intelligence capabilities with information technologies to create an intelligence-sharing operation that could identify threats before they became attacks.
From 1979 to 2003, Ms. Baginski served at the National Security Agency (NSA), where she held a variety of positions, including Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Director, Senior Operations Officer in the National Security Operations Center; Executive Assistant to the Director of NSA/Central Security Service, Chief Officer of the Director; Assistant Deputy Director of Technology and Systems; and lead analyst for the Soviet Union. As SIGINT Director, Ms. Baginski successfully established and directed a unified program to exploit encrypted or denied information on global networks. Leading the NSA’s Signals Intelligence Directorate, the Nation’s high technology cryptology organization, she managed a complex and geographically dispersed distributed information production enterprise.
“Maureen Baginski brings to Serco a wealth of experience and demonstrated successes in the intelligence community,” said Ed Casey, Chief Executive Officer of Serco. “She has distinguished herself in a number of federal government leadership positions and is considered a visionary by transitioning the intelligence community to using information and information sharing as a weapon to prevent terrorist attacks. We are truly honored to have Maureen join the Serco team.”
Ms. Baginski is the recipient of two Presidential Rank Awards, two Director of Central Intelligence National Achievement Medals, the Director of Military Intelligence’s Leadership Award, and NSA’s Exceptional Civilian Service Award. Ms. Baginski holds BA and MA degrees in Slavic Languages and Linguistics from the University of Albany. In December 2005, she received an honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from the University of Albany for her service to the nation.
About Serco Inc.: Serco Inc. is a leading provider of professional, technology, and management services focused on the federal government. We advise, define, develop, integrate, deliver, and maintain solutions that transform how clients achieve their missions. Our agility, customer-first approach, robust portfolio of services, and global experience enable us to quickly respond with solutions that achieve outcomes with value. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, Serco has approximately 11,500 employees and annual revenue of $1.4 billion, and is ranked as the 28th largest Federal Prime IT Contractor by Washington Technology. Serco Inc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Serco Group, a $6 billion international business that has helped transform government and public services around the world. More information about Serco Inc. can be found athttp://www.serco-na.com. Contact: Alan Hill Serco Inc. 703-939-6500″
“Serco do a bunch more that didn’t even make our story: As well as thanking God for his success, CEO Chris Hyman is a Pentecostal Christian who has released a gospel album in America and fasts every Tuesday. Amazingly, he was also in the World Trade Centre on 9/11, on the 47th floor addressing [Serco] shareholders. Serco run navy patrol boats for the ADF, as well as search and salvage operations through their partnership with P&O which form Defence Maritime Services. Serco run two Australian jails already, Acacia in WA and Borallon in Queensland. They’re one of the biggest companies In the UK for running electronic tagging of offenders under house arrest or parole.”
“UK Cabinet Office – Emergency Planning College – Serco …..Types of Exercise Workshop Exercises These are structured discussion events where participants can explore issues in a less pressurised environment. They are an ideal way of developing solutions, procedures and plans rather than the focus being on decision making. Table Top Exercises These involve a realistic scenario and will follow a time line, either in real-time or with time jumps to concentrate on the more important areas. The participants would be expected to be familiar with the plans and procedures that are being used although the exercise tempo and complexity can be adjusted to suit the current state of training and readiness. Simulation and media play can be used to support the exercise. Table-top exercises help develop teamwork and allow participants to gain a better understanding of their roles and that of other agencies and organisations. Command/Control Post Exercises These are designed primarily to exercise the senior leadership and support staff in collective planning and decision making within a strategic grouping. Ideally such exercises would be run from the real command and control locations and using their communications and information systems [Feeling lucky, Punk?]. This could include a mix of locations and varying levels of technical simulation support. The Gold Standard system is flexible to allow the tempo and intensity to be adjusted to ensure maximum training benefit, or to fully test and evaluate the most important aspects of a plan. Such exercises also test information flow, communications, equipment, procedures, decision making and coordination. Live Exercises These can range from testing individual components of a system or organisation through to a full-scale rehearsal. They are particularly useful where there are regulatory requirements or with high-risk situations. They are more complex and costly to organise and deliver but can be integrated with Command Post Exercises as part of a wider exercising package.”
“Sued for Fraud by DOJ, Security Co That Cleared Snowden Works for U.S. Immigration
APRIL 08, 2014
The federal contractor sued by the Justice Department for failing to adequately conduct government security clearances—including NSA leaker Edward Snowden—is processing sensitive immigration applications for the Obama administration.
This astounding information comes from a high-ranking government source with detailed knowledge of the arrangement. Though it‘s being investigated by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for fraud, United States Investigations Services (USIS), has been taking over a lot of administrative processing of immigration benefit applications, the inside source told Judicial Watch. The scandal-plagued company is also handling sensitive immigration files, despite its well-documented transgressions.
It’s preposterous that a company under fraud investigation is still allowed to handle sensitive government applications, JW’s source logically points out. Here’s how it happens; Most of USIS’s executives are retired officials who worked for the influential Senior Executive Service at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency that operates and oversees nearly every government activity in dozens of federal agencies. Their connections help them land federal contracts, JW’s source says, and once they land the lucrative deals they convince the government to let them do their own quality assurance so they cut corners.
The serious corner cutting came to light after Snowden, a National Security Administration contractor, divulged thousands of classified documents to the media. USIS, which handles the bulk of background checks for government security clearances, had conducted Snowden’s background check as well as the clearance for Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis. Since the two breaches occurred, former USIS employees have come forward accusing the company of unrealistic deadlines and workloads, dumping cases and producing incomplete background checks to meet revenue goals.
As part of its fraud probe of USIS, which is based in Falls Church, Virginia, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in federal court earlier this year accusing the contractor of failing to adequately conduct security checks in 40% of the cases it handled for the government. USIS submitted at least 665,000 incomplete background checks to OPM, the agency that officially contracts firms to do government work, the complaint says. It further alleges that USIS dumped and flushed cases, falsely representing them as completed, to maximize the company’s revenues and profits.
Months before it filed the complaint, the DOJ announced that it had launched an investigation of USIS, which the agency revealed had been contracted by the U.S. government since 1996 to perform background investigations on individuals seeking employment with various federal agencies. In the announcement a high-ranking federal prosecutor said USIS’s shortcuts would not be tolerated and that the DOJ would take action against those who charge taxpayers for services they failed to provide, “services that could place our country’s security at risk.”
The top federal prosecutor in the Alabama district where the DOJ filed the USIS lawsuit added that “the increase in foreign and domestic terrorism places an increased responsibility on our government to ensure that unsuitable individuals are prohibited from government employment.” That means thorough, appropriate and accurate background checks are essential in the employment of government personnel, the assistant U.S. Attorney said. It appears from the written announcement that the feds get it, but their actions (letting a tainted company handle sensitive immigration files) tell a different story.”
“STAYED, TYPE-E U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv-00726-RMC PERCIVAL v. U.S. INVESTIGATION SERVICES, LLC Assigned to: Judge Rosemary M. Collyer Case in other court: USDC for the Middle District of Alabama, 2:11cv00527-WKW Cause: 31:3729 False Claims Act Date Filed: 04/25/2014 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions Jurisdiction: Federal Question … MINUTE ORDER. On consideration of Defendant’s 31 Notification of Bankruptcy pursuant to Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et. seq. and in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 362, the automatic stay provision, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is stayed. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on February 13, 2015. (lcrmc1) (Entered: 02/13/2015)”
“First, the United States is a plaintiff in a pending False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 (“FCA”), lawsuit against debtor U.S. Investigations Services, Inc. (“USIS”). The lawsuit is based on false statements and claims related to background investigations that USIS knowingly presented to, or caused to be presented to, the United States that were not reviewed in accordance with the applicable contractual obligations (“FCA Lawsuit”). (See US FCA Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.) Specifically, the FCA Lawsuit alleges that USIS devised and executed a scheme — internally characterized as “dumping” or “flushing” — to deliberately circumvent contractually required quality reviews of completed background investigations in order to increase the company’s revenues and profits. (US FCA Complaint at ¶ 42.) In addition to USIS, Altegrity and certain non-debtor officers and directors of USIS (“Non-USIS Parties”) may have liability arising from the actions alleged in the FCA Lawsuit based on those parties’ involvement. The Plan impermissibly: (1) seeks a release of the Non-USIS Parties’ FCA liabilities; and (2) extinguishes the United States’ rights relating to setoff and recoupment; and (3) potentially precludes the United States from seeking a determination of non- 1 The United States reserves its rights to supplement or amend this Objection at any time. Case 15-10226-LSS Doc 654 Filed 06/19/15 Page 3 of 23 2 dischargeability of the Debtors’ fraud liability. … Third, USIS provided background investigation services to numerous federal agencies. As such, multiple statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations require USIS to safeguard the government data in its possession. The Plan should be amended to clarify that it does not affect the Debtors’ duty to comply with their data security obligations”
“FBI: ‘Hostile Actors’ Likely Hacked Clinton Email Secrets
Comey recommends not prosecuting presumed Democratic nominee
BY: Bill Gertz
July 6, 2016 5:00 am
An extensive FBI investigation found evidence that foreign government hackers accessed private emails sent by former secretary of state Hillary Clinton but no direct evidence spies hacked into the several unsecure servers she used.
FBI Director James Comey revealed Tuesday the 11-month probe into Clinton’s private email servers uncovered negligent handling of very sensitive classified information that was placed on several unsecure servers between 2009 and 2013, when Clinton served as secretary of state.
In an unusual public announcement, Comey outlined findings that included discovery of highly classified information sent and received on Clinton’s private email servers, and signs that “hostile actors” gained access to email accounts of people who were sharing emails with Clinton.”
“Serco farewell to NPL after 19 years of innovation 8 January 2015 Serco said goodbye to the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) at the end of December 2014 after 19 years of extraordinary innovation and science that has seen the establishment build a world-leading reputation and deliver billions of pounds of benefit for the UK economy. During that period under Serco’s management and leadership, NPL has delivered an extraordinary variety and breadth of accomplishments for the UK’s economy and industry. Some of the key achievements during that time have been:… It has been estimated that work carried out by the Centre of Carbon Measurement at NPL will save eight million tonnes of carbon emissions reductions (2% of UK footprint) and over half a billion pounds in economic benefit over the next decade…. NPL’s caesium fountain atomic clock is accurate to 1 second in 158 million years and NPL is playing a key role in introducing rigour to high frequency trading [for Serco’s front running banks] in the City through NPL [Zulu] Time.”
“Base One Technologies, Ltd. is a DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION, located in New York, NY and was formed on Feb 15, 1994.This file was obtained from the Secretary of State and has a file number of 1795583.
This business was created 7,695 days ago in the New York SOS Office and the registered agent is C T Corporation System that does business at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York in New York.
After conducting a search for principals and owners of Base One Technologies, Ltd., we were able to find 2 owners and/or executives. Their information is listed below. This file was last updated on May 14, 2013.
Liza R Zaneri
Chief Executive Officer
15 Irving Place
New Rochelle, NY 10801″
“Serco’s Office of Partner Relations (OPR) helps facilitate our aggressive small business utilization and growth strategies. Through the OPR, Serco mentors four local small businesses under formal Mentor Protégé Agreements: Three sponsored by DHS (Base One Technologies, TSymmetry, Inc., and HeiTech Services, Inc.,) and the fourth sponsored by GSA (DKW Communications, Inc.). Serco and HeiTech Services were awarded the 2007 DHS Mentor Protégé Team Award for exceeding our mentoring goals.”http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/100515p.pdf
“[White’s Club member] Rupert Christopher Soames OBE (born 18 May 1959) is a British businessman, CEO of the outsourcing [and long range death-betting bookmaker] company Serco. Soames was born in Croydon, Surrey, to Lord and Lady Soames. He is a grandson of Sir Winston Churchill, a nephew of the former Defence Secretary Duncan Sandys and Diana Churchill; the journalist Randolph Churchill and the actress and dancer Sarah Churchill and a great-nephew of the founders of the Scout movement, Robert Baden-Powell and Olave Baden-Powell. His brother is the Conservative MP Sir Nicholas Soames.
Soames was educated at St. Aubyns Preparatory School in Rottingdean, East Sussex and Eton College, and then Worcester College at the University of Oxford, during which time he worked as a DJ at the London nightclub Annabel’s, as well as being elected to the Presidency of the Oxford Union.
Upon graduation, he was offered a position at General Electric Company (GEC) by the managing director Arnold Weinstock. He remained at GEC for 15 years, working in the company’s avionics and computing divisions, and became managing director of Avery Berkel, running the company’s UK, India, Asia and Africa operations. After leaving GEC in 1997, Soames joined the software company Misys as chief executive of its Midas-Kapiti division. He was promoted to chief executive of the Banking and Securities Division in June 2000.
Soames left Misys after a disagreement with Misys founder Kevin Lomax on the company’s direction, and was appointed chief executive of power hire group Aggreko in June 2003, replacing Philip Harrower who died when his car collided with a train in the United States.”.”
Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222
David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation