#2323: Marine Links Ad Hoc Amok Serco To Clinton Base-One Patents, Black Hand Wag of Honeywell Dog

Plum City – (AbelDanger.net) Easter Sunday April 4, 2015: United States Marine Field McConnell has linked ad hoc way points allegedly imputed by Serco into the Airbus 320 of Germanwings Flight 9525 flown by ‘der amok pilot‘ Andreas Lubitz, to Hillary Clinton’s development of a GyroChip (QRS11) patent pool at Base One Technologies in the Bronx and the apparent Black Hand* navigators wag of a Honeywell dog in the “Method and apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an aircraft US7475851 B2.”

US7475851 B2 … Referring to FIG. 3, a flow diagram 300 depicts operation of the first embodiment 100 of the apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an aircraft. The flow begins when the UFD 110 senses 302 a manual trigger through the operator control 116. At this point, the uninterruptible power supply 114 supplies 304 uninterruptible power to the UFD 110 and other elements, such as the FBW system 104 and the AFCS 108, required for controlling the aircraft. “Uninterruptible power” as used herein is defined as power that is not routed through a circuit breaker or switch in the cockpit. To the extent possible, it is preferable that the power cannot be easily interrupted from anywhere inside the aircraft while it is in flight.

In response to the manual trigger, the UFD 110 communicates with the FBW system 104 and the AFCS 108 to carry out 306 a transfer of control of the FBW system 104 from the cockpit controls 102 to the AFCS 108. It is worth noting here that the transfer of control can be either complete or partial, depending upon what is deemed to be prudent. In the case of a transfer of complete control to the AFCS 108, all cockpit controls will cease to function, and the aircraft will be controlled exclusively by the AFCS 108, maintaining, for example, the current heading, airspeed, and altitude of the aircraft. While this might seem to be a sure way to foil a would-be-terrorist, it could have disastrous results if the aircraft were, for example, flying at a low altitude and heading toward a high mountain. An alternative, perhaps more prudent, approach would be to transfer partial control of the aircraft to the AFCS 108. For example, the cockpit controls might be allowed to initiate gentle turns, but not allowed to cause the aircraft to descend. As a further alternative, the AFCS 108 could be programmed to cause the aircraft to change to a predetermined altitude. Yet another alternative would be to allow the aircraft to descend only when coupled with an automatic landing system of an airport. Because the AFCS 108 and the UFD 110 are controlled by processors and software, the degrees of the transfer of control are virtually unlimited and thus preferably are programmable through well-known techniques, so that future changes and improvements can be implemented easily.”

In 2005, avionics supplier, Honeywell, was reported to be talking to both Boeing and Airbus about fitting a device aimed at preventing a 9/11-style hijack. On 16 April 2003, Honeywell filed patent US7475851 B2, Method and apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an aircraft. Airbus and BAE Systems, had been working on the project with Honeywell. Development sped up after the September 11, 2001 attacks.”

How often does an autopilot update the position of the ailerons (or any other control surface) during cruise? Per second, per minute, or something else? …. This is not only an Autopilot-specific question but also a design-specific question, which will be different based on the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and the Aircraft Specification. Usually in modern aircraft, the Autopilot sends commands to Flight Control System which then sends commands to Actuators and this progression of commands happens at different rates. This update rate could be, for example, 100 Hz (10 ms), 80 Hz (12.5 ms) or may be even slower or faster, depending on the flight control system of the aircraft. So, the command is not sent per second or minute, but rather 100’s of commands per second, because commands to move the control surface are the most critical commands on an aircraft.”

[Clinton acted as patent lawyer for] BEI Technologies, Inc. (ticker: BEIQ, exchange: Nasdaq) News Release – Tuesday, November 11, 1997 “… its micromachined GyroChip sensor has been selected by Honeywell and Boeing for use in a modification of the rudder system of the current model Boeing 737 airplane. This solid state quartz gyroscope is manufactured by Systron Donner Inertial Division (SDID), a division of BEI’s principal subsidiary, BEI Sensors and Systems Company, according to Charles Crocker, president and chief executive officer of BEI Technologies.…” (6) Inertial Sensors for use in: Aircraft Flight Control, Helicopter Flight Control, Missile and Projectile Guidance, Unattended Guided Vehicle Navigation For over 40 years Systron Donner Inertial Division (SDID) has been a leader in providing motion sensing devices and applications engineering expertise to Commercial and Military markets. SDID takes pride in its innovative designs of Linear Accelerometers and Angular Rotation Sensors which provide guidance and control capability for everything from missiles to commercial light and heavy aircraft. The development of a unique solid state quartz technology for inertial sensors gives SDID a competitive edge. Recently, SDID has introduced a growing family of proprietary solid state rotation sensors and accelerometers that utilize quartz as the active sensing element. Combined into multi-axis packaged assemblies and as stand-alone components, this new sensor technology is employed in such diverse applications as helping to navigate autonomous industrial robots through automated warehouses, stabilizing communications antennae on ships and for diagnosis and treatment of mobility disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Micromachining techniques have made these inertial sensing products smaller, lighter and more accessible to commercial markets. (20)”

McConnell notes that Serco (the world’s largest air traffic controller) processed a 2 millionth patent application for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in March 2013 giving it ample opportunities to transfer control of targeted aircraft to Clinton’s Base One patent pool for a Black Hand wag of Honeywell dogs on MH Flight 370, MH Flight 17 and QZ Flight 8501.

Black Hand* – Navigators for Serco clients, including HSBC, with “Patent Rights to Track, Film and Kill” from the City of London’s Honourable Artillery Company 1537; The Master Mariners and The Air Pilots (formerly GAPAN) 1929, and The Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts 1638 – whose alumni include U.S. Presidents James Monroe, Chester Alan Arthur, Calvin Coolidge and John F. Kennedy and – perhaps – Barack ‘Choom Gang’ Obama.

McConnell is launching a boycott campaign against the Bild Zeitung and the Daily Mail owners for their alleged libels of the late Andreaas Lubitz as the “amok-pilot” of Germanwings Flight 9525 after he (McConnell) had alerted FAA, ALPA, Sukhoi, Airbus and Boeing officials to Serco ad hoc way points, Clinton’s Base-One GyroChip patents and the Black Hand navigators who have allegedly been wagging Honeywell’s dogs at US7475851 B2.

Prequel 1: #2322: Marine Links Bild & Mail’s Der Pilot Amok To Serco’s Patent Practice Base, Black Hand Honeywell Hack

Prequel 2: Episode #78 – SUNDAY WIRE: ‘The Friendly Skies’, host Patrick Henningsen with guest Field McConnell

Prequel 3: How often does an autopilot update control surfaces’ positions?

xelis Deployable ATM Solutions Anytime Anywhere
 [See Serco use of ad hoc waypoints at 2:09]

“Exelis is the world leader in mobile, transportable and fixed installations for military and dual use airfields. Since 1943, we have produced and installed more than 2,500 ATC/ATM systems in 63 countries.”

“Germanwings co-pilot Andreas Lubitz, who murdered 149 people on Flight 9525, is pictured on the March 27 front page of Bild, Germany’s largest tabloid. The paper calls him the “man who became a mass murderer.” — “If it is doing what you say, it can also run amuck. Verhält es sich so, wie Sie sagen, könnte es auch Amok laufen.”

Serco… Would you like to know more? 

SWISSLEAKS – “HSBC developed dangerous clients:
 arms merchants, drug dealers, terrorism financers”
Copy of SERCO GROUP PLC: List of Subsidiaries AND Shareholders! (Mobile Playback Version) [Note that HSBC is Serco’s banker and, with Allianz and Her Majesty’s Government, one of Serco’s major shareholders] 

Killer pilot Andreas Lubitz ACCELERATED INTO Alps mountain, data from doomed plane’s second black box recorder reveals .. By SIMON TOMLINSON and PETER ALLEN FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 09:58 GMT, 3 April 2015 | UPDATED: 12:19 GMT, 3 April 2015 Killer pilot Andreas Lubitz accelerated the doomed Germanwings jet into the mountain, data from the second black box recorder revealed today. French air accident investigators said the 27-year-old used the automatic pilot to put the plane into a descent and repeatedly adjusted the controls to speed up the aircraft.”

ZWEITE BLACKBOX BESTÄTIGT: ANDREAS LUBITZ FLOG MIT ABSICHT IN DEN TOD|Amok-Pilot beschleunigte mehrfach vor dem Absturz Flugdatenschreiber zeichnet über 500 Daten auf – was kann er noch verraten? 03.04.2015 – 14:22 Uhr Paris – Die Auswertung der zweiten Blackbox bestätigt: Amok-Pilot Andreas Lubitz (†27) flog die 149 Menschen an Bord des Germanwings-Airbus mit Absicht in den Tod. Der Co-Pilot hat kurz vor dem Absturz in den französischen Alpen das Flugzeug mehrfach beschleunigt. Dies teilten die französischen Ermittler mit. Der Co-Pilot habe den Autopiloten wiederholt so verändert, dass die Geschwindigkeit im Sinkflug der Maschine beschleunigt wurde, erklärte die französische Luftfahrtermittlungsbehörde BEA in Paris. Der Autopilot sei so eingestellt worden, dass die Maschine auf 100 Fuß sinkt. Das habe eine “erste” Auswertung des am Donnerstag geborgenen Flugdatenschreibers ergeben.”

Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot .. is a set of sub-routines aimed at defeating attempts at aircraft hijacking by removing electrical power from an aircraft’s flight deck, and irrevocably passing pilot authority to the autopilot and navigational computer for an automated landing at a safe airfield that can deal effectively with the incident. .. In 2005, avionics supplier, Honeywell, was reported to be talking to both Boeing and Airbus about fitting a device aimed at preventing a 9/11-style hijack. On 16 April 2003, Honeywell filed patent US7475851 B2, Method and apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an aircraft. Airbus and BAE Systems, had been working on the project with Honeywell. Development sped up after the September 11, 2001 attacks… 1980–1999 Boeing and Honeywell along with Lockheed Martin developed the RQ-3 DarkStar unmanned aerial vehicle. The UAV’s flight path could be modified en route from a remote location by up-linking new waypoints to the Darkstar’s Flight management system. .. 1980 – 1984 Boeing and Honeywell developed and launched a digitally integrated flight management system that would automatically fly an aircraft along the best route according to an integrated flight database and flight cost routines.[4] New digital fly-by-wire aircraft incorporated glass cockpit systems which are essentially software driven. .. 1992 To maintain the United States’ technological advantage, the Department of Defense co-funded Research and Development of technology for dual military / civilian use. Manufacturers could on-sell this technology to recoup its development costs. 1993 The purpose of the Technology Reinvestment Project (TRP) unveiled by the Clinton Administration was to promote integration of the commercial and military industrial bases, through dual-use technology investments. … 1995–2000 (AIMS-1) Honeywell and Boeing relocated all major flight control and navigational functions into an integrated flight management system. The new brains of the Boeing aircraft was the Airplane Information Management System (AIMS)[8] and the Integrated Air-data Inertial Reference System (ADIRS), which are both supplied by Honeywell. 2000 onwards (AIMS-2) At the heart of the 2000 upgrade was Honeywell’s Airplane Information Management System (AIMS) whereby the third redundant flight control computer was relocated into the AIMS with its own inaccessible secondary power supply.[9] This resulted in the AIMS flying the aircraft with flight control only augmented by the pilot, in other words, pilot input was no longer necessary. 2001 The US government lifted restrictions on GPS error insertions into the GPS and Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) signals meaning that aircraft could navigate using the DGPS signal. This facilitated the automated landing of aircraft controlled by the Boeing-Honeywell AIMS programming introduced a year earlier.”

Where in the world is Hillary Clinton’s server? POSTED AT 2:01 PM ON MARCH 20, 2015 BY NOAH ROTHMAN .. 
It was less than two weeks ago that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton assured the nation that her “homebrew” email server was safely secure in her home in Chappaqua, New York. She insisted that the hardware was fortified behind a locked door and had a Secret Service detail mentoring it night and day, as though the greatest security threat that system faced was via a physical attack by a team of cartoonish cat burglars…. Now, working with publicly available tools that map network connectivity, experts have established that the last “hop” before the mail server’s Internet Protocol, or IP, address (listed as is Internap’s aggregator in Manhattan (listed as [allegedly linked to the Serco/Base One war room in the Bronx]

From the early days of the Republic, Congress and the federal courts grappled with the government’s rights to own or use patents it issued. Courts rejected the British “Crown Rights” rule that allowed the sovereign to practice whatever patents it issued. Instead, the federal government was conceptualized as a legal person on par with any other persons with regard to issued patents. But, this simple rule presented challenges as complexities arose in three intertwined patent rights scenarios. The first involved inventions by government employees. The second revolved around government and government contractor use of patents held by private citizens. And the third involved inventions by federal contractors and their employees arising under federal funding. While these three scenarios seem quite distinct today, nineteenth and early twentieth century courts often treated them as overlapping. The confusion was not resolved until the mid-twentieth century when a combination of executive branch and Congressional legislation set the roots of current government patent policy. This Article reviews the history in detail and illuminates current government patent policy debate occurring through such seemingly diverse cases as Stanford v. Roche and Zoltek Corp. v. United States.”

“Base One Technologies 

Expertly researches, designs, and develops information security policies that protect your data and manage your firm’s information technology risk at levels acceptable to your business. Performs architectural assessments and conducts both internal and external penetration testing. The results of these efforts culminate in an extensive risk analysis and vulnerabilities report. Develops and implements multi-layer Information Security Solutions, practices and procedures. We deploy Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and IP Security with VPN solutions using Cisco routers, Frame Relay, firewalls, address and port translation, obscurity standards and authentication technologies (AAA, 3DES, TACACS, etcŠ), to enhance and meet the level of Data Security required for global organizations. Conducts IT Security and Risk Assessment in Federal government as well as security testing, implementing security for multiple platforms and operating systems around the world. Ability to conduct business process analysis to provide technical security countermeasures, risk management and data communications security planning for large organizations. Provides computer security integration for web server and traditional client-server based applications. We secure environments up to as many layers as required by our clients’ policies, industry practices, and regulating bodies – including the desktop and user experience as required. Develops, implements and supports Information Security Counter measures such as honey-pots and evidence logging and incident documentation processes and solutions.”

“111 Eighth Avenue 
New York, NY 10011 
Description Base One Technologies, Ltd. is a DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION, located in New York, NY and was formed on Feb 15, 1994. This file was obtained from the Secretary of State and has a file number of 1795583. This business was created 7,695 days ago in the New York SOS Office and the registered agent is C T Corporation System that does business at 111 Eighth Avenue , New York in New York. Principals Liza R Zaneri Chief Executive Officer 15 Irving Place New Rochelle, NY 10801 Registered Agent C T Corporation System 111 EIGHTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10011″

SOURCE: Base One Technologies September 02, 2008 09:00 ET Base One Technologies, Inc. Continues Operations in Government Space NEW ROCHELLE, NY–(Marketwire – September 2, 2008) – Base One Technologies, Inc. is pleased to announce that it has sold its affiliate, Base One Technologies Ltd., to Apptis Inc. Base One Technologies, Inc. will continue to compete in the government space as an 8(a), HubZone and Woman Owned Small Disadvantage Company. Base One Technologies, Inc. is an IT Engineering and Technical Services company founded in 1994. Base One has a Top Secret Facilities Clearance and specializes in: Enterprise Architecture, Network Infrastructure Support, Data Security, Software & Database Services, Disaster Recovery & Contingency Planning, and Independent Validation & Verification. Base One is a privately-held organization with headquarters in New Rochelle, NY. For more information visit: www.base-one.com. Contact Information: Liza R. Zaneri Base One Technologies 914 633-0200 x205 “www.base-one.com

“Serco’s Office of Partner Relations (OPR) helps facilitate our aggressive small business utilization and growth strategies. Through the OPR, Serco mentors four local small businesses under formal Mentor Protégé Agreements: Three sponsored by DHS (Base One Technologies, TSymmetry, Inc., and HeiTech Services, Inc.,) and the fourth sponsored by GSA (DKW Communications, Inc.). Serco and HeiTech Services were awarded the 2007 DHS Mentor Protégé Team Award for exceeding our mentoring goals.”

“President Obama meets with LDS Church leaders during Utah visit 
SALT LAKE CITY — President Barack Obama met with leaders from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints during his first visit to Utah as president, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Thursday.

Prior to the meeting, Earnest spoke about the agenda.

“I know the president also is looking forward to the opportunity that he’ll have to meet with some leaders in the LDS church who are in town for the conference there, so I know the president’s looking forward to that opportunity,” Earnest said in an interview with FOX 13.

“Obviously, we’ve got Christians all around the world who are celebrating Easter this weekend, and so it’ll be a good time for him to spend a little time with the LDS leadership as well.”

The topics under discussion reportedly included immigration and the LDS Church’s long-history of humanitarian aid. According to LDS Church spokesman Eric Hawkins, President Obama met with “President Henry B. Eyring, President Dieter F. Uchtdorf, Elder L. Tom Perry and Elder D. Todd Christofferson.”

Hawkins stated that LDS Church President Thomas Monson did not attend, as he is saving his strength for the LDS Church’s semi-annual General Conference, which begins this weekend.

Hawkins stated: “President Monson remembers fondly his visit to the White House to present President Obama with his personal family history in 2009. Because of the need to preserve his strength for this weekend’s General Conference, it was felt that the logistics of meeting away from Church offices, with the walking and the waiting periods associated with a presidential visit, would regrettably not be conducive to President Monson’s participation.”

This was not Obama’s first meeting with LDS leaders. Dieter F. Uchtdorf, Second Counselor of the First Presidency of the LDS Church, was among the religious leaders from various denominations who spent time with Obama in the Oval Office in April 2014 to give their input on immigration reform.

First Lady Michelle Obama has also met with LDS church leaders. Michelle Obama visited the LDS church’s headquarters in February 2008 on behalf of her husband, who was campaigning for his first presidential bid at the time. Michelle Obama met with Elders Quentin L. Cook and M. Russell Ballard during her visit at LDS church headquarters.”

Yours sincerely,

Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222

David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation

328 Total Views 1 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post