#2173: Marine Links Serco Hot-Air Banker to Kaya Identity Death By Telemetry and MH370 Freescale Snuff

Plum City – (AbelDanger.net): United States Marine Field McConnell has linked HSBC – Serco’s lead banker in the $92 trillion hot air Carbon Disclosure Project – to the use of Kaya Identity chips to monitor death by telemetry events allegedly including the snuff-film killing of the 8 Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor whoe were passengers on the Boeing 777-200ER plane of MH Flight 370 which was disappeared on March 8, 2014..

McConnell claims that Serco – with Barack Obama and David Archer at the University of Chicago – developed an on-line calculator for the Kaya Identity to help insiders of the hot air Carbon Disclosure Project to monitor citizens of countries’ violating carbon-cap protocols and support telemetry back hauls of HSBC snuff-film images pour encourager les autres.

McConnell alleges that Obama has extorted President Xi Jinping into an agreement to cut China’s carbon emissions after showing him HSBC snuff films of the murder of the Freescale employees who apparently used Kaya Identity chips to target planes through the Airbus Telemetry and Command Station at Oakhanger managed by Serco’s Gary Butcher.

McConnell alleges that Bob Coulling – Serco’s in-house PFI sponsor – set up the Oakhanger Airbus facility so potential whistle-blowers such as the Freescale employees on MH 370, could be tracked with the Kaya Identity Chip and snuffed at crime scenes pre-populated with tagged offenders to remove any evidence of HSBC’s wag the hot-air dog snuff films.

McConnell attributes the recent collapse in the value of the Serco share price to Abel Danger‘s exposure of Serco’s Kaya Identity telemetry tracking of victims whose deaths are allegedly recorded in an HSBC snuff-film archive at One Canada Square (D2 Banking), Canary Wharf, London.

McConnell invites uncompromised individuals in the entities below to investigate Serco’s Airbus Telemetry and Command Station Manager at Oakhanger, Gary Butcher, and the 32-year veteran PFI manager Bob Coulling and check the tradecraft needed to disappear MH 370 and snuff selected passengers, especially in terms of electronic warfare, tagging, Kaya Identity offset for asset recovery and paedophile image analysis for the MOD, GCHQ, CESG, Police, Home Office, Serious Organised Crime Agency, Ministry of Justice and Customs and Revenue and Immigration Service.

Prequel 1: #2172: Marine Links Serco Hot-Air Telemetry Track to Flash-Crash Boeing, Down-Low Hack

Flash Crash Down Low Hack MH17

Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot

Serco… Would you like to know more?

“MH17 and MH370 flight controls were hacked. The planes’ flight paths were diverted over restricted airspace and subsequently shot down. 

Both MH17 and MH370 made abrupt changes in their flight paths. Both planes flew over restricted airspace. This was the work of hackers who have taken control of those planes. The 777 is especially vulnerable since it is completely computer controlled in all regards including flight controls.

You might ask that if hackers took control of the planes then why not just crash them immediately? They can’t. The 777’s software will not allow the planes to crash. If a hacker attempted to do so, the software would prevent the crash. The hackers’ only option was to fly the planes over dangerous areas so that they would be shot down.

It is possible that both planes were from the same airline either because someone inside the airline gave passwords which allow access to the planes’ controls or there is an online security vulnerability at Malaysia Airlines.

This is huge. Let’s get this pinned, people.”

“CDP investor initiatives
Climate change, water scarcity, flooding, pollution and deforestation present material risks and opportunities to investors.

In order to protect their long term investments, institutional investors must act to reduce the long-term risks arising from environmental externalities.

CDP investor initiatives – backed in 2014 by more than 767 institutional investors representing an excess of US$92 trillion in assets – give investors access to a global source of year-on-year information that supports long-term objective analysis. This includes evidence and insight into companies’ greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and strategies for managing climate change, water and deforestation risks.

Leveraging the power of the shareholder and lender, CDP has gathered the largest global collection of self reported environmental information. Our system enables companies around the world to measure, disclose, manage and share climate change, forest and water information. As a result, these investor initiatives play a critical role in driving emissions reductions and improved water and forest management and trigger corporate behavioral change.

CDP requests standardized climate change, water and forest information from some of the world’s largest listed companies through annual questionnaires sent on behalf of institutional investors that endorse them as ‘CDP signatories’. These shareholder requests for information encourage companies to account for and be transparent about environmental risk. Transparency of this data throughout the global market place ensures the financial community has access to the best available corporate environmental information to help drive investment flows towards a low carbon and more sustainable economy.”

“HSBC [Serco’s banker and the world’s largest money launderer] became the first major bank in the world to commit to going carbon neutral. The bank made the announcement on the opening day (6th December 2004) of the 10th Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Francis Sullivan is HSBC’s Advisor on the Environment. Here he talks to the climate group about HSBC’s commitment:
Why did HSBC decide to go carbon neutral?

HSBC believes that climate change represents the largest single environmental challenge this century. Earlier this year, HSBC was involved with the launch of The Climate Group and the Carbon Disclosure Project. At that time, we made our views on climate change public. We have now announced the next phase of our response to climate change, the HSBC Carbon Management Plan, on the opening day of the 10th Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
How will HSBC achieve this?

The Carbon Management Plan lays out HSBC’s plans to reduce the Group’s contribution to climate change through three different approaches: energy efficiency to reduce our energy use; buying ‘green’ electricity where possible; and offsetting our remaining carbon dioxide emissions.

How will HSBC ensure that offset projects are truly beneficial?

HSBC is establishing a Carbon Management Task Force to oversee the process of finding suitable credible, genuinely incremental and cost-effective offsets. The Task Force is sponsored by the Group Chief Executive and will include 5 HSBC employees and two external partners: The Climate Group and ICF Consulting. When we are confident we can make good decisions on how best to offset our {CO2} emissions we will make an announcement.

What is the timeframe for going carbon neutral?

We expect this will be during 2005.

How important are partnerships with external organisations in taking things forward?

Partnerships are critical for us to decide how best to reduce our energy use and make good carbon offset decisions. We believe that The Climate Group, ICF Consulting, The University of Newcastle and UEA, all of whom we have strong partnerships with, can really help us there. Although they are all based in the UK, they have diverse international partners, which is important to the world’s local bank.

HSBC has recently established a three-year, £650,000 collaboration with Newcastle University and the University of East Anglia (UEA). Called the ‘HSBC Partnership in Environmental Innovation’, it is a global programme to research climate change and other major forms of environmental damage, society’s awareness of the issues, and to develop technologies to overcome some of the problems identified.

How does HSBC plan to address climate change in financing and investment decisions?

Our Carbon Management Plan will deepen our first-hand experience and understanding of energy efficiency, emissions trading, and related policies and technologies. We will be better placed to understand the challenges and opportunities faced by our customers and to provide them with the right advice as appropriate. Helping to ensure that companies are well-placed to manage in a carbon constrained world will be the over-riding approach we take. We are getting our own house in order first.
Is the issue rising up the agenda for the banking sector?

Yes. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme starts on 1 January 2005 and the Kyoto Protocol comes into force on 16 February 2005. From next year carbon will start to have a real cost to business; financial institutions need to understand the impacts this may have on their customers.
What are the key things banks can do to minimise their carbon footprints?

Energy efficiency in property management is a good place to start. Reducing business travel [by killing passengers] can yield real benefits, but is difficult to achieve in a rapidly growing business. We believe that credible carbon offsets are the way forward, once energy efficiency gains have been maximised.

How does it benefit HSBC to be taking the lead within the sector – what are the business benefits of taking action to reduce emissions?

Sir John Bond, HSBC group chairman, sums up the business benefits when he said: “HSBC has a deep and longstanding commitment to the environment, and it is our judgement that climate change represents the largest single environmental challenge this century. It will have an impact on all aspects of modern life. It is therefore a major issue for our customers and our staff, as well for every organisation on the planet, no matter how large or how small.”
Should businesses be pushing forward emission reduction, or is this a job for government?

A large-scale collective effort is going to needed to address climate change. Governments must play their part, and help the public to make informed decisions. Banks should also do their bit. We recognise that many of our customers have already set targets for reducing their emissions and we support them for doing so, as this will reduce their costs and help maintain their reputations for being responsible.
What next for HSBC?

In the short term we must assess the options for offsetting our carbon dioxide emissions and devise a process for making offset decisions which are credible, genuinely incremental and cost effective. Watch this space!

The views presented in the Viewpoint Series are not necessarily representative of the views of The Climate Group.”

“The “Kaya Identity”
We can actually play around with greenhouse gas emissions scenarios ourselves. To do so, we will take advantage of something known as the Kaya Identify. Technically, the identity is just a definition, relating the quantity of annual carbon emissions to a factor of terms that reflect (1)population growth, (2) relative (i.e., per capita) economic expansion, measured by annual GDP in dollars/person, (3) energy intensity, measured in terawatts of energy consumed per dollar added to GDP, and (4) carbon efficiency, measured in gigatons of carbon emitted per terawatt of energy used. Multiply these out, and you get gigatons of carbon emitted. If the other quantities are expressed as a percentage change per year, then the carbon emissions, too, are expressed as a percentage change per year, which, in turn, defines a future trajectory of carbon emissions and CO2concentrations.
Mathematically, the Kaya identity is expressed in the form:

F = P * (G / P) * (E / G) * (F / E), 
F is global CO2 emissions from human sources
P is global population growth
G is world GDP
E is global energy consumption

By projecting the future changes in population growth (P), economic expansion (G/P), energy intensity (E/G), and carbon efficiency (F/E), it is possible to make an informed projection of future carbon emissions (F). Obviously, population is important as, in the absence of anything else, more people means more energy use. Moreover, economic expansion measured by GDP per capita plays an important role, as a bigger economy means greater use of energy. The energy intensity term is where technology comes in. As we develop new energy technologies or improve the efficiency of existing energy technology, we expect that it will take less energy to incerase our GDP by and additional dollar, i.e., we should see a decline in energy intensity. Last, but certainly not least, is the carbon efficiency. As we develop and increasingly switch over to renewable energy sources and non-fossil fuel based energy alternatives and improve the carbon efficiency of existing fossil fuel sources (e.g., by finding a way to extract and sequester CO2), we can expect a decline in this quantity as well, i.e., less carbon emitted per unit of energy production.

Fortunately, we do not have to start from scratch. There is a convenient on-line calculator here, provided courtesy of David Archer of the University of Chicago (and a RealClimate blogger ). Below a brief demonstration of how the tool can be used. After you watch the demonstration, use the link provided above to play around with the calculator yourself.”

“Serco Receives “Supplier of the Year” from Boeing for Enterprise Architecture Expertise 5/19/2011
RESTON, VIRGINIA – May 19, 2011 – Serco Inc., a provider of professional, technology, and management services to the federal government, has been recognized as Supplier of the Year by The Boeing Company in the Technology category for its state-of-the-practice Enterprise Architecture solutions.

The Boeing Supplier of the Year award is the company’s premier supplier honor, presented annually to its top suppliers in recognition of their commitment to excellence and customer satisfaction. This year’s 16 winners represent an elite group among more than 17,525 active Boeing suppliers in nearly 52 countries around the world. This selection was based on stringent performance criteria for quality, delivery performance, cost, environmental initiatives, customer service and technical expertise. This is the second time Serco has been recognized as Supplier of the Year by Boeing. In January 2011, Serco also received the Boeing Performance Excellence Gold Award in recognition of the Company’s performance excellence.

“We are extremely honored to receive this recognition for our work in support of Boeing. This prestigious award demonstrates our passion for excellence and ability to apply Serco’s Enterprise Architecture expertise across a broad range of applications,” said Ed Casey, Chairman and CEO of Serco. “We continue to grow our EA practice, and over the past 15 years we have deployed solutions to support enterprises and systems across federal and commercial environments.”

Serco’s Enterprise Architecture Center of Excellence is based in Colorado Springs, CO. The team provides a variety of services in support of Boeing’s business units as well as research and development efforts. Serco’s architecture employs object-oriented (OO)/Unified Modeling Language (UML) to define, design and satisfy defense agencies’ mission-critical requirements, including Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I). This approach improves system developer’s understanding of operational requirements and how best to integrate enterprise operations and systems for the optimal fulfillment of C4I and other operational needs.

About Serco Inc.: Serco Inc. is a leading provider of professional, technology, and management services focused on the federal government. We advise, design, integrate, and deliver solutions that transform how clients achieve their missions. Our customer-first approach, robust portfolio of services, and global experience enable us to respond with solutions that achieve outcomes with value. Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, Serco Inc. has approximately 11,000 employees, annual revenue of $1.5 billion, and is ranked in the Top 30 of the largest Federal Prime Contractors by Washington Technology. Serco Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Serco Group plc, a $6.6 billion international business that helps transform government and public services around the world. More information about Serco Inc. can be found at www.serco-na.com.”

By Ed Barnes
Published March 25, 2009
In 2000 and 2001, while Barack Obama served as a board member for a Chicago-based charitable foundation, he helped to fund a pioneering carbon trading exchange that is likely to fill a critical role in the controversial cap-and-trade carbon reduction scheme that President Obama is now trying to push rapidly through Congress.

During those two years, the Joyce Foundation gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”

One of those gases is carbon dioxide, the most ubiquitous greenhouse gas and the focus of the most far-reaching — and contentious — efforts to combat “climate change.” On Monday, Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide a public health threat.”

“Climate change, water scarcity, flooding, pollution and deforestation present material risks and opportunities to investors.

In order to protect their long term investments, institutional investors must act to reduce the long-term risks arising from environmental externalities.

CDP investor initiatives – backed in 2014 by more than 767 institutional investors representing an excess of US$92 trillion in assets – give investors access to a global source of year-on-year information [hot-air telemetry tracking] that supports long-term objective analysis. This includes evidence and insight into companies’ greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and strategies for managing climate change, water and deforestation risks.”

Deal on Carbon Emissions by Obama and Xi Jinping Raises Hopes for Upcoming Paris Climate Talks
What the Climate Accord Could Change
WASHINGTON — The historic announcement by President Obama and President Xi Jinping of China that they will commit to targets for cuts in their nations’ carbon emissions has fundamentally shifted the global politics of climate change. The agreement has given a fresh jolt of optimism to negotiations aimed at reaching a new international climate treaty next year in Paris, where the American and Chinese targets are expected to be the heart of the deal.

“For the world’s biggest emitters to be coming together and announcing concrete numbers, serious numbers, sends a signal to the world,” said David B. Sandalow, who was Mr. Obama’s assistant secretary of energy for policy and international affairs until May 2013. Nearly two decades ago, the world’s first climate change treaty, the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, failed to stop the rise of planet-warming carbon pollution in large part because of a standoff between China and the United States, which never signed the deal.

But experts and negotiators cautioned that the emissions reductions targets now put forth by the two countries will not be enough to prevent an increase in global atmospheric temperature of 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 Fahrenheit. That is the point where scientists say the planet will tip into a future of dangerous and irreversible warming, which will include the loss of vast stretches of arable land, rapid melting of Arctic sea ice, rising sea levels, extreme droughts, storms and flooding.”

“Chairman Mo’s little red website
National Post ·
Why are people not more aware of the greatest threat to human freedom and prosperity since the collapse of Communism?

I refer not to the 2008 financial crisis, or man-made climate change, but to that eminent Canadian Maurice Strong. He is, after all, more than any other person responsible for sending the nations of the world down the path to Copenhagen.

It seems that Mr. Strong too may be fed up with his lack of profile. He has set up a website, www.mauricestrong.net,where you will find the bald — but accurate — statement that “Maurice Strong is the world’s leading environmentalist.” From heading the first UN environment conference in Stockholm in 1972 to masterminding the 1992 Rio summit, “Maurice Strong,” says Maurice Strong’s website, “has played a unique and critical role in globalizing the environmental movement.” Mr. Strong is now 80 years old and thus out of the running for the title of CEO of “Earth Inc.,” but it is his environmental nightmares and dreams of global governance that will dominate Copenhagen. This is a man, we might remember, who welcomes the collapse of industrial civilization, and has described the prospect of billions of environmental deaths as a “glimmer of hope.” My editor didn’t believe me when I wrote this, so here’s what Mr. Strong actually said, in his autobiography, in a section described as a report to the shareholders, Earth Inc, dated 2031: “And experts have predicted that the reduction of the human population may well continue to the point that those who survive may not number more than the 1.61 billion people who inhabited the Earth at the beginning of the 20th century. A consequence, yes, of death and destruction — but in the end a glimmer of hope for the future of our species and its potential for regeneration.”
The site raises questions about just what Mr. Strong’s role and status might be at Copenhagen. A cloud fell over his UN career when he was implicated in the Iraqi oil-for-food scandal, but Mr. Strong never abandoned his crusade. He just moved to Beijing.”

“Some people call me Maurice” The Pompatus of Love, Maurice Strong..

Here’s Strong, thinking dangerous thoughts aloud at the conclusion of an interview with WEST magazine in May, 1990 entitled “The Wizard of the Baca Grande”:

Each year the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set the economic agendas for the year ahead. What if a small group of these word leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment? Will they agree to save the earth?

The group’s conclusion is “no.” The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?

This group of world leaders form a secret society to bring about a world collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists – they’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock exchanges, and computers, and gold supplies, a panic. Then they prevent the markets from closing. They jam the gears. They have mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davros as hostage. The markets can’t close. The rich countries…?

The journalist adds, “and Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out of the window. I sat there spellbound…. He is, in fact, co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum. He sits at the fulcrum of power. He is in a position to do it.” 

“Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) is a series of communications satellites operated by the United States Air Force Air Force Space Command. The spacecraft will be used to relay secure communications for the Armed Forces of the United States, the British Armed Forces, the Canadian Forces and the Royal Netherlands Armed Forces. The system will consist of six spacecraft in geostationary orbits, of which three have been launched. AEHF will replace the older Milstar system and will operate at 44 GHz Uplink (EHF band) and 20 GHz Downlink (SHF band).[1]

AEHF spacecraft use a large number of narrow spot beams directed towards the Earth to relay communications to and from users. Crosslinks between the satellites will allow them to relay communications directly without the need to relay them to a ground station first. The satellites are designed to provide jam-resistant communications with a low probability of interception, and incorporate frequency-hopping. The spacecraft are equipped with phased array antennas that can adapt their radiation patterns in order to block out potential sources of jamming.

AEHF incorporates the existing Milstar low data-rate and medium data-rate signals, providing 75–2400 bit/s and 4.8 kbit/sec–1.544 Mbit/s respectively. It also incorporates a new signal, allowing data rates of up to 8.192 Mbit/s.[2] When complete, the space segment of the AEHF system will consist of six satellites, which will provide coverage of the surface of the Earth between latitudes of 65 degrees north and 65 degrees south.[3]

The initial contract for the design and development of the AEHF satellites was awarded to Lockheed Martin Space Systems and Northrop Grumman Space Technology in November 2001, and covered the System Development and Demonstration phase of the program. The contract covered the construction and launch[citation needed] of three satellites, and the construction of a mission control segment. The contract was managed by the MILSATCOM Program Office of the United States Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center. Like the Milstar system, AEHF will be operated by the 4th Space Operations Squadron, located at Schriever Air Force Base….
First AEHF Satellite (USA-214)[edit]
Main article: USA-214

The first satellite, USA-214, was successfully launched by an Atlas V 531 rocket on 14 August 2010, from Space Launch Complex 41 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. This occurred four years behind schedule; when the contract was awarded in 2000 the first launch was expected to occur in 2006.[citation needed] The program was restructured in October 2004, when the National Security Agency did not deliver key cryptographic equipment to the payload contractor in time to meet the launch schedule.[4]”

“Serco supported the AFSCN communications support squadron in partnering with military and government contractors to supervise an Air Force Satellite Control Network test effort at Oakhanger, United Kingdom. Their innovative test procedures and creative solutions provided a viable implementation plan designed to improve communications capability .. The team’s outstanding support and will bring new capabilities and enhanced services to our critical warfighting mission.” –Maj Gen Dale W. Meyerrose, Air Force Space Command, Director of Communications and Information”

Yours sincerely,

Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222

David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation

555 Total Views 1 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post