Plum City – (AbelDanger.net). United States Marine Field McConnell has linked the MI-3* Innholders Livery Company’s use of Mycroft Warrants to move Expert and Travelling Criminals, to Serco’s fraudulent procurement of covert locator bracelets for the U.S. Marshals Warrant Information Network (USM-007) and the false hue and cry raised by Barack Obama after FEMA had held multiple lone-gunman exercises on December 14, 2012, at and near the Sandy Hook Elementary School, Newtown, Connecticut.
Mycroft Warrant = A writ issued by a competent but blackmailed or extorted officer, usually a judge or magistrate, which permits an otherwise illegal act that would violate individual rights and affords the person executing the writ protection from damages if the act is performed.
MI-3 = Kristine Marcy + Norman Inkster + Interpol + Intrepid (William Stephenson)
McConnell claims Serco root companies extorted Mycroft warrants from the Prince of Wales (later Edward VII) to operate a hue and cry telegraph service at London’s Langham Hotel and blackmail pedophile Innholder guests in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.
McConnell claims that Serco director Maureen Baginski used Mycroft Warrants and Skynet bracelet to guide USM-007 criminals past Sandy Hook crime scenes to shoot Adam Lanza and his mother; name brother Ryan as suspect and brief Obama on the hue and cry needed to divert attention from the MI-3 Mycroft forfeiture-funded network of Travelling and Expert Criminals.
President Obama Speech Statement Tears on Sandy Hook School Newtown Connecticut Shooting
McConnell suggests the best remedy for the allegedly false hue and cry is to strike a runaway grand jury in Newtown and collect evidence from all participants in the contemporary exercise.
McConnell invites key word Googlers to read excerpts below and ask why “The List of Sherlock Innholders – The Wrist That Didn’t Bleed” book has a new title at http://www.abeldanger.net/
#1852: Marine Links MI-3 Mycroft Covert Locators to Marcy Serco USM 007, Sandy Hook Hue and Cry
“Since March 6, 2011 A&E Network has aired Breakout Kings, a drama television series revolving around a task force of convicted criminals and U.S. Marshals working together in order to try and catch fugitives escaped from prison. The story is that the cons’ sentences are reduced by one month for each fugitive they bring in; however if any of them should try to escape, they will all be returned to their original prisons and their sentences will be doubled.”
“The Police Gazette (also known as The Hue and Cry) was a magazine produced in London from 1772 onwards, for circulation among all the police forces of Britain. Its primary purpose was to publish notices of wanted criminals with requests for information, and where appropriate to offer rewards…. The Quarterly Pursuit was first issued by John Fielding, chief magistrate of the Bow Street Police Court, in 1772. … The publication was repeatedly renamed, first to Public Hue and Cry. It became The Hue and Cry, and Police Gazette on 30 September 1797. It was renamed to Police Gazette; or, Hue and Cry on 18 January 1828. It became simply The Police Gazette on 1 April 1839. Responsibility for its production rested with the Home Office. Editing was delegated to the Chief Clerk to Bow Street Magistrates Court, notably John Alexander (chief clerk) who edited the Police Gazette from 1877 until 1895. Responsibility for the Police Gazette was transferred to the Metropolitan Police (‘Scotland Yard’) in 1883. The Police Gazette is still published today. … Supplement A, The Police Gazette. No. 16, Friday, August 5, 1921. Vol VIII. Expert and Travelling Criminals. http://www.londonancestor.com/misc/misc-policegaz.htm Issues of the Police Gazette between 1750 and 1799 are also available online at the British Newspaper Archive. http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk Issues of the Police Gazette (5000+ pages) between 1816 and 1901 are also available online at the http://www.lastchancetoread.com”
“In English legal history, a thief-taker was a private individual hired to capture criminals. The widespread establishment of professional police in England did not occur until the 19th century. With the rising crime rate and newspapers to bring this to the attention of the public, thief-takers arose to partially fill the void (or in some cases widen it) in bringing criminals to justice. These were private individuals much like bounty hunters. However, thief-takers were usually hired by crime victims, while bounty hunters were paid by bail bondsmen to catch fugitives who skipped their court appearances and hence forfeited their bail. Both types also collected bounties offered by the authorities. Sometimes, thief-takers would act as go-betweens, negotiating the return of stolen goods for a fee. However, they were often corrupt themselves, for example extorting protection money from the crooks they were supposed to catch. Government-funded rewards for the capture of criminals was a corrupting influence, leading directly to the Macdaniel scandal. Jonathan Wild is perhaps the most notorious thief-taker. He operated in London and by the 1720s, was a famous and popular figure. However, he actually led a gang of thieves; he would arrange the return of property stolen by his own underlings. To keep up the belief that he was working legitimately, he would even hand over members of his gang, who would inevitably end up being hanged at the Tyburn Tree. When this was discovered, he himself was hanged for perjury in 1725.”
“The Macdaniel affair or Macdaniel scandal occurred in England in 1754 when it came to light that a gang, led by Stephen MacDaniel, had been prosecuting innocent men to their deaths in order to collect reward money. It was an unintended consequence of British government rewards for the capture of criminals. Before those rewards were instituted, thief-takers depended primarily on privately funded rewards from victims seeking return of stolen property or other restitution. However, this scandal formed part of the impetus for the formation of salaried public police forces who did not depend on rewards.”
“The Sandy Hook Elementary Sacrifice and Deception
After researching the Sandy Hook Elementary school massacre there is no doubt the world wide news event was a blood sacrifice intertwined with the gun control subject. As in 9/11, the London subway bombing, the Batman shooting, a FEMA simulated training exercise occurred the same day, at the same time, identical from the “real” event. The fake event overshadowed the “real event” which was an inside job. The FEMA simulated training exercise provided media confusion. The below movie nicely combines the police scanner communication and all the phony parent (actors) interviews which none of these people ever shed a tear.
The beginning of the video shows excerpts from the 2009 movie (Rampage). I found the video to be very compelling that proves that the Sandy Hook Elementary murders was another inside job that provided a winter solstice sacrifice for the activation for the New World Order.
Exercise Documentation: The Master Scenario Events List (MSEL) is a chronological timeline of expected actions and scripted events (i.e., injects) to be inserted into operations-based exercise play by controllers in order to generate or prompt player activity. It ensures necessary events happen so that all exercise objectives are met.
So picture it like this… 29 regular people show up (including Ryan Lanza) ~50 miles away from Sandy Hook Elementary to participate in a DHS/FEMA drill/exercise involving child response to disaster (Adam being the missing 1 person, who’s role would be given to another person since he was a no show for the drill)… the general “plot” of this drill is given to people as they arrive at the drill (A mass casualty school shooting involving 2 brothers (Adam & Ryan))… the exact specifics about the drill/event however, have not given to the 29 people when they arrive (9:00am), and is not given to them until AFTER the real event takes place (~10:00am)… the drill’s exact plot (Layer 2) is then written on the fly directly following the completion of the real event (Layer 1) to match it in almost every detail but with some minor tweaks (2 brothers kill their mom, steal her car/guns, drive to the school she works at dressed in plain clothing, one goes in the front door (buzzed in) one goes in the back door (let in by other shooter later), 28 casualties total, 4 pistols used total (AR in trunk), shooter Adam (alias “Ryan”) escapes after the fact, while shooter Ryan (alias “Adam) is shot by police)… Keep in mind the drill was held in a firehouse not an actual school (but the firehouse drill was to simulate a school shooting even though they weren’t in a school for the drill… specifically simulating SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY)… Also Keep in mind Adam Lanza was set to play alias “Ryan”, while his brother Ryan was set to play the other shooter alias “Adam). The 30 participants (as someone would fill alias “Ryan’s” role since Adam didn’t make it for the drill…) now having their aliases, each being given only their characters first name… which would match the actual dead at the real event (so there would be a character named Dawn Hochsprung, Adam Lanza, Ryan Lanza, Nancy Lanza, Victoria Soto for example…) never actually being told the alias last name) are given their specific roles to play (knowing very little about other characters aliases or roles), and a general timeline of events to follow, create a near exact ECHO of the entire real event at a location ~50 miles shortly after the real event takes place (less then an hour). Both events (real & fake) would directly include a character named Adam Lanza… and both (real & fake) would also include a character named Ryan Lanza as well due to Adam being found with Ryan’s ID (which is what caused all the initial stories about multiple shooters, one escaping, and the surviving killer being Ryan (and Adam being dead in BOTH the real and fake event)).
The drill participants are then told “good job guys, we will assess the data and learn a lot from this”. The 30 people would leave the drill location knowing nothing of a real event taking place which they will likely learn about shortly after getting home (except Ryan who won’t make it home… see later)… but the drill participants would never tie the 2 events together and would just pass it off as a coincidence and nothing more… a lot of the details are the same but enough are different that the drill participants would see them as 2 separate things… such as we didn’t do a school shooting drill… we did a firehouse shooting drill (the participant not knowing the drill was actually simulating a school… just not using a school)… or our drill had 2 shooters, this one has one… or our drill used pistols, this event used mostly AR’s… enough differences that they would see the 2 events (drill vs event) as quite similar but still different.
Also as part of the drill they are told there will have multiple phases (including a fake event, fake media reports, fake interviews, fake official stories all of which would be presented on the news as if real… the drill participants would be told to expect to hear the details about the drill go national as wider reaching parts of the same drill are to test citizens response of the drills official “reports”).
So now you have 2 near exact events (1 real, 1 fake), both in the same state (CN) at around the same time (morning), matching in most details including the shooters name & his brothers name (as well as victims names), overall theme (large scale school shooting involving mass casualty of children specifically at SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY in BOTH cases), and have a timeline consistency of each other (order of events & outcome)…
Shortly after the drill a whole bunch of similar and slightly different versions of the real and fake event start surfacing at the same time (which is why there is multiple versions of every part of this story… 2 shooters… no wait 1 shooter… killer suicide himself… no wait cops shot him… He’s Ryan… no waits he Adam… his mom works at the school… no wait she doesn’t and so on) the fake and real info mix in such as way that you can’t differentiate it in most cases and the average sheeple will 100% assume all the info is referring to the real event as they would have 0 information about a drill ever taking place (~5% of the actual news about CN shootings is about the real event… ~95% is about the fake event)… presented in a way to seem like it’s referring to the real event, knowing that most people know nothing of the drill ever existing.
At this point (~11am – noon) a duplicate FAKE media frenzy / police presence (using only actors) would be created at the drill location as an echo to the same which is happening at the real event ~50 miles away. This totally staged duplicate would include fake reporters, fake by standards, fake family members (being interviewed), fake official reports, fake everything talking specifically about the drill (not the real event).”
“Serco to pay back £69m over fraudulent tagging contracts ..
Serco on Thursday agreed to repay the Government £68.5m. The scandal concerned the Ministry of Justice being charged for tagging people who were found to be dead, back in prison or overseas. Both Serco and G4S are currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office.”
Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222
David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation
220 Total Views 2 Views Today
Please follow and like us: