#1842: Marine Links MI-3 Langham War Rooms to Mycroft Spot-Fix Pride, Serco Wi-Fi 7/7 Bomb

Plum City – (AbelDanger.net). United States Marine Field McConnell has linked MI-3 Innholders Livery Company war rooms (Imperial Brain) to a‘Mycroft’ spot-fixing service for Pride (LGBT) guests and staff of the Langham Hotel Group who allegedly bet on heterosexual body counts associated with Serco’s Wi-Fi bombing attack on the London Underground on 7/7.

McConnell claims that a Serco root company – The Electric Telegraph Company – set up the Langham Hotel telegraph office in 1865 to send messages which could be decrypted by war-room / betting insiders if they bought the Playfair Cipher key word from Mycroft sodomites and telegraph boys. 

McConnell claims that the BBC and Ladbroke betting groups – former Langham owners – conspired with Serco government insiders (Mycroft) to equip Pride-friendly hotels with Wi-Fi war rooms for the spot-fixing body count of heterosexual obstacles to the Bilderberg Hotel drive towards: ‘Supranational sovereignty of a [homosexual] elite and world bankers’.

McConnell claims Serco director Maureen Baginski had Gareth Williams tracked and snuffed by Wi-Fi Pride after he attended Black Hat/Def Con 18 security conferences in Las Vegas in July 2010 and was found to have hacked Mycroft – the MI-3 Innholders Imperial Brain.

McConnell invites key word Googlers to read excerpts below and ask why “The List of Sherlock Innholders – The Wrist That Didn’t Bleed” book has a new title at https://abeldanger.blogspot.com/

Prequel 1:
#1839: Marine Links MI-3 Langham Onion Cipher Key to Mycroft Lincoln Hit, Serco Boston Bomb

9/11 7/7 drills coincidences movies drills foreknowledge part 1

Langham Hotel London, Luxury 5 Star Hotel in London

Hillary Clinton WorldPride Award Acceptance Video
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accepts World Pride award via video

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accepts World Pride award via video

‘I really want to thank you for standing up for the rights of LGBT people everywhere’
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appeared via video on Thursday (5 May) to accept the World LGBT Award at the World Pride gala dinner at the Langham Hotel in London.

‘I want especially to acknowledge all the people who are working hard to advance human rights in their own communities and countries… making a difference everyday, often at great cost to themselves,’ Clinton said.

Clinton received the award from Pride London and the Kaleidoscope trust for her work in supporting gay rights worldwide.

The former First Lady and US Senator has long been a supporter of LGBT rights. She made headlines last December with a speech at the UN in Geneva where she demanded global rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.

Of the LGBT award she said: ‘Although I want, once again, to thank you for honoring me with this award, I really want to thank you for standing up for the rights of LGBT people everywhere.’

The World Pride 2012 Gala Dinner ‘Dine with Pride’ is a fundraising event to support Pride London’s newly created Solidarity Fund to support organizations  that work with the LGBT community to tackle homophobia and transphobia.”

As a HSBC Premier cardholder, you are invited to enrol as our elite 1865 Voyager member and start to enjoy preferential and personalised services every time you stay at Langham’s portfolio of properties. By making the payment with HSBC Premier Card, you can also take advantage of the special privileges we have arranged for you when you make a booking at the Best Available Rate.

Your 1865 Voyager membership

HSBC Premier cardholders can be exempted from the 1865 Voyager membership entry requirement – 5 stays within 12 months, and immediately start to enjoy the member-exclusive benefits, including complimentary room upgrade (subject to room availability), in-room broadband internet access, late check-out till 6pm, personalised welcome amenities and many more. To find out more about 1865 Voyager privileges, please visit 1865 website.

To enrol as an 1865 Voyager member, please click the “ENROL NOW” button below.”

February 26, 2011NK33 comments

It is quite startling to realise that a special room had been set up to receive the dead of the July 7thbombings in a temporary morgue built on army land, the contract for which (see [1] below) arrived on the contractor’s desk on July 6th, the day before the massacres.

All the bodies of the dead were taken and placed in cold-storage there.

Not until the Inquest, five years later, did startled lawyers acting on behalf of the victim-families get to hear, that NO POST MORTEMS  had been performed on the dead.

Let us repeat this astonishing statement, the better to realise our own astounded bafflement:

Let’s listen to the bewildered comment from pathologist Dr. Awani Choudhary, one of the first doctors on the scene from the BMA at Tavistock Square, who testified to the Inquest about his attempts to save the life of Gladys Wundowa:

‘I have not seen the post-mortem report, but I thought that she was bleeding from somewhere … So if the post-mortem says that she was not bleeding from anywhere, just had a spinal injury, I will be surprised…

Q. Since you ask about the post-mortem, can I simply inform you that, as with all the other casualties of the day, no internal post-mortem was conducted into Gladys Wundowa, so unfortunately, much as we would like the answers to the questions that you’ve asked, they don’t –

A. I… I’m absolutely sure that she had had internal injury as well as a spinal injury, and I’m absolutely surprised that a post-mortem has not been done through and through.
Q. Well, Mr Choudhary, that isn’t a matter to concern you.
A. Sorry.
Q. … we don’t need to concern ourselves about that matter.     (Jan 20 am, 63:22- 65:6)
No, of course not. 52 dead and no post-mortems, nothing to worry about.




The lawyer acting for the families expressed shock and outrage at the fact that ‘cause of death’ had not been definitely confirmed. Would their clients have to put up with ‘brief, neutral and factual’ statements over this most basic of issues? The Telegraph reported from the Inquest:

‘But the bereaved families said the coroner should be allowed to go into much greater detail about how the deaths came about. They do not want a ”sterile” conclusion that their loved ones were unlawfully killed that fails to rule on whether the security agencies could have prevented the atrocities or whether the emergency services could have saved more lives, their lawyers said.
‘Patrick O’Connor QC, for the relatives, told the inquest in a legal argument hearing: ”Of course the bereaved interested persons would be very disappointed. But the public may well be quite astonished if that were the position and we were literally kept to the kind of one, one-and-a-half, two sentence verdict in the inquisition that is suggested by some.”

‘He added: ”The statue of Justice is very often depicted blindfolded, but never gagged.” (18 Feb., 2011)

An Inquest without any post-mortems? By way of to trying to remedy this situation, the Inquest turned to the MOD. Why should it be their business? They had to construct a model to show the probable fatal injuries and likely causes of death for those with no obviously fatal external injuries. Colonel Mahoney, Defence Professor of Anaesthesia and Critical Care at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine in Birmingham, spent a couple of days at the Inquest explaining the situation, whereby ‘virtual Underground carriages’ had been constructed as models, but it all seemed rather vague:

Q. But your approach must, overall, be read subject to a number of caveats?
A. Yes.
Q. Firstly, as you mentioned, there was no invasive post-mortem in any case.
A. Yes.
Q. Secondly, the X-ray examination was limited, as you’ve just said, to fluoroscopy?*
A. Yes.
Q. Thirdly, although you have photographic evidence, in some cases the photographs were difficult to interpret, for reasons I won’t explore with you?
A. Yes.        [Jan 31 pm 5:3-17]
Still Clueless about the Explosions

Colonel Mahoney was faced with not only an absence of post-mortems, but also with a weird absence of a coherent theory about the explosive that had been used … We saw how earlier in February the Government’s explosives experts at the Inquest had to tiptoe around the fact that none of them would endorse the government’s peroxide-and-black pepper story. Asked to prepare a report for the Inquest, Colonel Mahoney did so. We note a couple of remarks he made there, from comments he had heard from Clifford Todd, the forensic expert.

His report alluded to ‘Mr Todd’s opinion that the devices were consistent with the use of high explosives.’ In no way can peroxide and black pepper be called a high explosive. Secondly, he found ‘There is little evidence from Mr Todd’s evidence to suggest that the devices produced a significant heat output.’ (‘Blast waves and their effect on the Human Body’, pp.18 & 19) Any peroxide bomb with back pepper as a base is a thermal bomb, because the heat comes from the rapid oxidation of the pepper. The more home-made the bomb the more it is going to be ‘thermal’ ie produce heat. Only the high-blast expertly made explosives of the military will yield a pure blast without heat.

Thus Colonel Mahoney’s report nullifies the Inquest’s silly joke about peroxide and black pepper – it points back to the first theories about the 7/7 blast, which emerged in the week after the event, when the real experts were averring that a military explosive had been used.  Colonel Mahoney is the author of several books on this topic: Lady Justice Hallett alluded to ‘the area in which you are most expert: namely, the effects of explosive devices.’  (Jan 31 am, 66:3-4)

What happened to the Bodies?

Why did the families have to wait for a week or sometimes even more, before they learned of the fate of their lost ones? A study by Jenny Edkins (University of Wales, Aberystwyth, author of ‘Trauma and the Memory of Politics’) about the way 7/7 victims were treated  explained, ‘This paper is motivated by a concern, an anger even, at the way in which people were treated by the authorities in the aftermath of the London bombings of July 2005. In particular, communication with those searching for missing relatives or friends was one-way or nonexistent. This treatment, it seems to me, provides an example of what Michael Dillon has called “governing terror…”’

 ‘Families were plunged into a world of Disaster Victim Identification Forms, Police Liaison Officers, and stonewalling by officials…. In the aftermath of the explosions on the London underground and in Tavistock Square in Bloomsbury on Thursday 7 July 2005, relatives of the missing were kept waiting for up to or over a week for information about where their sons and daughters, friends and family members might be.’

We cite five examples:

*    Marie Fatayi-Williams was only allowed to see her son Anthony’s body on July 14th a week later . A police officer was standing around. She had to make a great deal of fuss to obtain this, and she kept being advised against it. She tells this in her book, For the love of Anthony.  She is nevergiven the body, she cannot bury her own son.

*   A film by Benedetta Ciaccia’s former boyfriend, Raj Babbra, called ’7/7 – Life Without Benedetta’,  has her father and mother, speaking in Italian (in Part 3 at 3:58, with only a bit of it subtitled), say: ‘It’s an awful thing to lose your child … let alone not being able to see her dead … they didn’t show her to me … I was advised not to see her … we were told it was better to remember her the way she used to be.’ They never even got to see her body.

*     John Taylor, 60, whose 24-year-old daughter Carrie died in the Aldgate blast, described how it took 10 days for he and his wife to discover that their child had died.

*    In A Song for Jenny by Julie Nicholson (2010), the Reverend Julie Nicholson asks a policeman why it was taking so very long before she heard about her daughter Jenny (p287), her book gives the wierd reply: ‘He confirmed four hundred body parts had been recovered and sent to a specialised laboratory in Bosnia for ID, which could take several weeks.’ – no comment! She was dissuaded from wanting to see her daughter’s body, but she insisted. She knew it was her daughter Jenny (she wrote) because of the hands.

*     Relatives of Samantha and Lee, a couple who both died as a result of the bombings, did not get a formal identification of Samantha until 16 July, nine days after she gave her full name to her rescuer at Russell Square. The parents complained, ‘We were never asked if we could or would like to see her or be with her. We do not know where her body was kept.’ Asked Jenny Edkins, ‘Why was it not possible for this family to be with the body? Why was the information that she was dead withheld from them?’

The default position may have been, that families did not see the bodies of the deceased. Whatever was going on, the protocol seems quite macabre. Alison Anderson and Robert McNeil were the experts in body identification who organised the mortuary after the July 2005 London bombings, and they had worked for the United Nations in Bosnia and Kosovo. Why did the families need to wait for so long? Why was there a military company coping with the bodies? We can only wonder what was written on the death certificates, as next to nothing seems to have been ascertained about how they died.

J7 have written what is arguably their most brilliant piece yet on this topic, and let’s quote here from it:

So, assumptions are piled upon presumptions and houses of cards are built on shifting sands. These are the openly-stated unknown unknowns from which the bereaved families are meant to learn how they lost their loved ones.
[1]   Military site for the Bodies

It is also quite startling to realise that a special room had been set up to receive the dead – starting work on July 6th, the day before the 7/7 massacres.

Here is a statement about what happened on that day, and where the bodies went:

Based in Northamptonshire in the UK, the company [De Boer] had already completed several contracts for the Metropolitan Police …The De Boer team spent months visiting permanent mortuaries and attending meetings with London Resilience to suggest a suitable structure and interior design… Six months later on July 6, 2005, a document arrived at De Boer’s UK headquarters finalising what had been agreed for a future crisis response. Within 24 hours the plan was being realised .and implemented with the creation of a temporary mortuary in the grounds of the Honourable Artillery Company near Moorgate Underground Station in central London.’ (source, ‘London’s Response to 7/7’ David Donegan  Office of the Strategic Health Authorities at NHS, in www.crisisresponsejournal.com no longer online, held in J7 archives:  and quoted here)

Good timing or what? Thus an ‘emergency mortuary’ was established on a Military site in the City of London – its contract for the work received on the day before the catastrophe. Not only did this military site receive all of the bodies (and it claimed to start receiving them on the morning of 8th July), but it set up ancillary sites adjacent to the four blast sites on the morning of July 7th: ‘Outside of the mortuary De Boer also provided structures and furniture at each of the Underground Stations affected, and refrigeration facilities at the site of the bus bombing.’

The De Boer company managed it so well that, in recognition, its project manager was invited to meet Tony Blair at Downing Street. It was felt that, at such very short notice – after all, they only got the job on July 6th – they had done a fine job. Concerning the swift freezing of the bus bomb victim bodies: while researching ‘Terror On The Tube’ . I could only see two or three corpses lying around in all of the photographs of that bus wreck, so I guess the De Boer team must have removed them swiftly.

We are also reminded of the big FEMA vans that arrived to clear up the damage in New York at Ground Zero on 9/11 (Federal Emergency Management Agency): they were proud of how quickly they arrived, in fact they arrived (by a similar sinister precognition) on Monday evening, the day before the very surprising 9/11 event.
*     The ‘fluoroscopy’ method was described as ‘a limited form of X-ray,’ which showed embedded bits of metal etc. Thus, ‘Primary surveys of whole bodies in unopened body-bags were undertaken using fluoroscopy by teams of two radiographers and a pathologist.  The aim of the primary survey was to establish the nature of the contents of the bag,..’ (Forensic Radiography:  Response to the London Suicide Bombings on 7th July 2005, Mark D. Viner)”
Son, 22, of Maddy murder detective is accused of tennis betting scam at Australian Open
Daniel Dobson ‘used a device sewn into his shorts to send information’

‘Data sent to international betting ring before action reached TV screens’

His father is Detective Inspector Tim Dobson of Met Police ‘Gold Group’

PUBLISHED: 13:25 GMT, 23 January 2014 | UPDATED: 14:28 GMT, 23 January 2014The British tourist at the centre of an alleged tennis betting scam is the son of a senior Met Police murder detective investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, it emerged today.

Daniel Dobson, 22, has been charged with illegal gambling by allegedly sending information about play at the Australian Open to an international betting ring, using a device sewn into his shorts.

His father is Detective Inspector Tim Dobson, a member of the Metropolitan Police’s ‘Gold Group’ dealing with the cold case review of missing Madeleine.

Daniel Dobson, currently being held in Melbourne, is one of six men accused of helping gambling associates beat the time TV time lag.

He is set to fly back to Britain on Monday, after paying his bail bond and agreeing to return to Australia later this year for further court dates.

Dobson, of New Malden in south-west London, was arrested after a match where he allegedly used a device to wirelessly send points information to an international betting agency before the action reached TV screens. 

Dobson was said to have used the advantage of the 10-second delay between action and live TV to send the data and affect the betting odds.

Melbourne Magistrates Court was told that Dobson had allegedly had the device built into his shorts and linked to his mobile phone.

Police are searching for two other Britons in relation to the alleged offence, known as ‘courtsiding’, following Dobson’s appearance in court earlier this month.

At a previous hearing, police prosecutor Josh Diemar told the court: ‘He sent the agency the results before they could get them through the official channels.

‘That data has been sent quicker than the official results can get posted, and had the ability to affect betting odds.’

The Met Police team reviewing Madeleine’s disappearance believe she may have been abducted during a bungled burglary after conducting a review of the case.”

The Langham, London is one of the largest and best known traditional style grand hotels in London. It is in the district of Marylebone on Langham Place and faces up Portland Place towards Regent’s Park. It is a member of the Leading Hotels of the World marketing consortium.

The Langham was built between 1863 and 1865 at a cost of £300,000. It was then the largest and most modern hotel in the city, featuring a hundred water closets, thirty-six bathrooms and the first hydraulic lifts in England. The opening ceremony on June 16was performed by the Prince of Wales. After the original company was liquidated during an economic slump, new management acquired the hotel for little more than half what it had cost to build, and it soon became a commercial success. In 1867,[1] a former Union officer named James Sanderson was appointed general manager and the hotel developed an extensive American clientele, which included Mark Twain and the miserly multi-millionairess, Hetty Green. It was also patronised by the likes of Napoleon IIIOscar WildeAntonín Dvořák, and Arturo Toscanini. Electric light was installed in the entrance and courtyard at the exceptionally early date of 1879, and Arthur Conan Doyle set Sherlock Holmes stories such as A Scandal in Bohemia and The Sign of Four partly at the Langham.

The Langham continued throughout the 20th century to be a favoured spot with members of the royal family, such as Diana, Princess of Wales, and many high profile politicians including Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle.[2] Other guests included Noël CowardWallis SimpsonDon Bradman, Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia and Ayumi Hamasaki.

The Langham was hard hit by the Great Depression and the owners attempted to sell the site to the BBC, but Broadcasting House was built across Portland Place instead. During World War II, the hotel was used in part by the Army until it was damaged by bombs and forced to close. After the war, it was occupied by the BBC as ancillary accommodation to Broadcasting House, and the corporation purchased it outright in 1965.

One BBC employee who stayed at the Langham was Guy Burgess, one of the ‘Cambridge Five’, a spying ring who fed official secrets to the Soviets during the Cold War. A BBC internal memo reveals that upon being unable to access his room in the hotel late one night, Burgess attempted to break down the door with a fire extinguisher.[3]
The ballroom became the BBC record library and programs such as The Goon Show were recorded there.[citation needed] In 1980, the BBC unsuccessfully applied for planning permission to demolish the building and replace it with an office development designed by Norman Foster. In 1986, BBC sold the property to the Ladbroke Group, who later purchased the non-US Hilton Hotels, for £26 million and eventually reopened the hotel as the Langham Hilton in 1991 after a £100 million refurbishment. New owners extended the hotel and carried out other refurbishments between 1998 and 2000. Further renovation took place between 2004 and 2009, at an estimated cost of £80 million, bringing the hotel back to the status of its grand past and maintaining the quintessential English feel and level of sophistication of its early days.”

Ladbrokes, one of the world’s leading betting and gaming companies, today announced the launch of a new, unique financial spread betting service on its website – Ladbrokes.com.

The Ladbrokes Financial Spreads offering, developed in conjunction with WorldSpreads, is unique as it operates on a dual platform giving both new and experienced spread betting customers the option of using a service specifically tailored to their needs. Unlike certain other regular spread betting services Ladbrokes Financial Spreads offers new spread bettors the assurance of limiting their losses to the amount they have deposited in their Ladbrokes account by using the “Standard Platform”. Other advantages of the Standard Platform include free guaranteed stops, spreads as low as 1 point and the ability to buy or sell movements such as the day change on any one of the 18 most popular indices and currencies including UK100, Dax, Wall Street and Nasdaq.

An experienced spread bettor can switch to the “Advanced Platform” which has features including Trailing Stops to enable automatic management of your account. The Advanced Platform also enables spread bettors to trade using “Contingent Orders” where a trade is not activated until another separate order is executed (for example a buy order is not triggered until a separate sell order is completed). With the Advanced Platform a spread bettor can also be both long and short in the same market at the same time. The range of markets also extends beyond the leading indices to stock prices of the UK top 100 and 250 as well as leading Irish, European, US and South African companies. It is also possible to bet on the futures of these markets.

Ladbrokes has over 765,000 active customers on its sportsbook and the new spread betting service is aimed at appealing to these customers as well as new customers seeking an easy to understand financial spread betting service.

John O’Reilly, MD, Ladbrokes Remote Betting and Gaming said, “Ladbrokes customers now have the option of spread betting using a choice of platforms tailored to their level of experience and knowledge. We are committed to offering our customers the widest possible range of betting and gaming opportunities and financial spread betting is the latest demonstration of that commitment.”

Ladbrokes offers a single online wallet across sportsbook, casino, poker, bingo and financial spreads. As such money can be placed in a financial spread betting account at all times, not just when markets are open. Ladbrokes Financial Spreads is also offering customers up to £300 cashback on net losses made in the first 8 weeks of opening a spread betting account.

Ladbrokes Financial Spreads is a trading name of WorldSpreads Ltd. WorldSpreads Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under registration No: 230730.
For further information contact:
Ciaran O’Brien
Head of Public Relations
+44 (0) 7976 180173


About Ladbrokes:

Ladbrokes is a leader in the global betting and gaming market with over 2,700 betting shops in the UK, Ireland, Belgium and Spain.  The Company also operates betting facilities at nine FA Premiership grounds and numerous racecourses, including Ascot.

In addition to its extensive retail presence Ladbrokes is a world leader in remote betting and offers thousands of betting markets on a daily basis over the telephone and the Internet at www.ladbrokes.com. The telephone betting operation, utilising call centres in the UK and Malaysia, services over 100,000 customers, while Ladbrokes.com, the Company’s online betting and gaming facility, has attracted more than 765,000 active clients.

Betting is available in 21 languages and 18 currencies. The site incorporates the highest levels of security, which underwrite an integrated array of sports betting and gaming services available 24 hours a day, 365 days of the year.

The company, the origins of which date back to 1886, employs 16,000 people in six countries and is one of the worlds leading betting and gaming companies.
About WorldSpreads Group plc:

WorldSpreads Group plc (AIM: WSPR) is a fast growing financial services group offering online and telephone trading. The Group’s core activity is the provision of spread betting products on the financial markets to retail clients from its website www.worldspreads.com. WorldSpreads Limited, a wholly-owned trading subsidiary of WSPR, is regulated and authorised by the Financial Services Authority. It offers a full range of spread betting prices on all the major financial markets, including stock indices, individual shares, currencies, commodities and interest rates. The Group floated on the London Stock Exchange’s AIM market in August 2007 and gained a dual listing by joining the Irish Stock Exchange’s ESM market in May 2008.

Risk Warning

Spread betting is a leveraged product. It carries a high level of risk to your capital and, as it is possible to lose more than your initial investment, it may not be suitable for all investors. Therefore, ensure you understand the risks involved and seek independent advice if necessary. The tax treatment of spread bets may be subject to change in the future.”
Yours sincerely,
Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222
David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation

370 Total Views 2 Views Today
Please follow and like us:

Related Post