#1685: Marine Links MI-3 Lockheed Cheney to Hackney Carriage Driveline and Princess Di Boston Brakes
Plum City – (AbelDanger.net). United States Marine Field McConnell has linked MI-3 Agent and former Lockheed Martin director Lynne Cheney to Lockheed-GKN’s alleged development of Driveline patent pool devices for use by The Worshipful Company of Hackney Carriage Drivers in the ‘Boston Brakes’ murder of Princess Di.
MI-3 = Global supply-chain protection racket operated through City Livery Company patent pools (108)
Marcy (Livery Company Liquid8(a) Chip – Prisoner Medical Services – JABS – DOJ Asset Forfeiture Funds)
+ Inkster (RCMP Wandering Persons Registry – KPMG Consulting – Abusive tax shelter – Escrow frauds)
+ Interpol (Berlin 1942-1945 – Operation Paperclip – Foreign Fugitive File – William Higgitt – Entrust)
+ Intrepid (William Stephenson – GAPAN patent pool – MitM Pearl Harbor attack – Kanada Kommando)
MI-3 = Marine Insertion Intelligence and Investigation unit set up in 1987 to destroy above
McConnell notes that in Book 12, published at www.abeldanger.net, agents deployed by the Marine Insertion, Intelligence and Investigations (MI-3) group are mingling in various OODA modes with agents of the Marcy Inkster Interpol Intrepid (MI-3) protection racket based at Skinners’ Hall, Dowgate Hill.
#1684: Marine Links MI-3 Deutch to Liquid8(a) Chip to Hackney Carriage Drivers, Princess Di Boston Brakes
#1402 Marine Links Lynne Cheney to Time-Stamped ‘Dykes-In-the-Middle’ and JonBenet Santa Serco Clock
Who Killed Princess Diana?
WTF!! New Evidence Princess Diana Was Murdered By British Military??
“FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 2007
Princess Diana’s Death: The Mystery of The Stolen Mercedes
Princess Diana: The Disturbing Events Surrounding Her Death
One would expect that with the financial means Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana had at their disposal there was absolutely no reason why they should have been chauffeured in a vehicle that had been snatched at gunpoint a few days prior to the fateful night of August 31, 1997.
But that is precisely what happened!
The car in which the ill-fated couple was traveling, a Mercedes Benz S280, had been stolen some days prior to the crash. This fact on its own is perhaps at best nothing more than pure coincidence but where that event turns decidedly strange is how that very Mercedes was returned a few days earlier in pristine condition save for one very important aspect…
THE ONBOARD COMPUTER CHIP WAS MISSING FROM THE STOLEN MERCEDES!
The onboard computer chip controls, amongst other things, navigation, acceleration, steering and braking of a vehicle. [Allegedly calibrated for remote control of the Lockheed-GKN Drivline in Boston Brakes mode] Considering that Princess Diana’s death was due to a car crash, the fact that the Mercedes S280 involved in the crash had its onboard computer chip stolen some days earlier (and nothing else mind you…suggesting the car-snatchers were no ordinary thieves) pushes the pervasive accident account onto firmer conspiracy territory.
To date there actually exists a well established assassination technique from the 1980s (developed by the British SAS) nicknamed “The Boston Brakes” which involves steering, braking and acceleration capability being taken over by remote control!
In fact world famous explorer and former SAS officer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes did indeed confirm the relatively common use of this assassination method with particular reference to the death in England of one Major Michael Marman in a car accident that bears uncanny resemblance to that of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul.
So what could have been the motive behind the theft of the Mercedes Benz S280 that was involved in the Paris tunnel crash on August 31, 1997?
Well let’s see; assuming you want to execute a very sensitive, high profile assassination but at the same time create as little fuss as possible, the best way to go about it is to make it look like an accident.
Keeping that in mind the disappearance of the onboard computer chip from the “Crash S280” then makes a lot of sense. Steal the car, remove the onboard computer chip, replace the old chip with a new doctored onboard computer chip that allows another party to gain remote control over the car and tada…
You’ve got yourselves a genuine accident in the making!
Furthermore, very suspiciously, the stolen Mercedes Benz S280 was the only vehicle “available” to the Princess and her companions that night! Talk about leaving nothing to chance!
MERCEDES BENZ DENIED ACCESS TO EXAMINE CRASH VEHICLE!
Initial reports leaked to the press suggested that the Mercedes Benz S280 involved in the crash had been zooming at speeds in the neighborhood of 120 mph! If this were translated into km/h this would come out to a staggering 192 kilometers per hour!
In fact reports of the day had the speedometer of the car stuck at 196 kilometers per hour (122 mph).
The truth of the matter is if the car had been traveling anywhere near those speeds, seat-belt-or-not NOBODY would have survived that crash (the only person to survive the crash was bodyguard Trevor Rhys-Jones who sat in the passenger seat and is widely believed to have been an operative of MI6 or MI5 branches of the British Secret Service).
Many professional drivers have decried the authority-cited-speeds (120mph region) as being absolutely preposterous and from the evidence available to them put the car at about 60 mph (96km/h) at the time of the accident.
To date, Mercedes Benz has never been able to examine the car for the simple reason the authorities never allowed them. This in itself is very strange because Mercedes Benz experts should have been party to the panel of experts examining the car!
How about if for no other reason than they built and engineered the vehicle and thus would have been in an excellent position to determine how fast the car was going and what caused the various impact damage to the vehicle.
It would appear though that an internal investigation conducted by Mercedes Benz (albeit with the rather limited information available to them) seemed to suggest a speed of 60mph was far more reasonable than the 120mph spread by authorities and that the safety protective features of the Mercedes more or less behaved as expected.
This may explain why Trevor Rhys-Jones who was seat-belted in the passenger seat and thereby in the least likely position for surviving such an accident survived! (The passenger seat is known in the industry as “The Death Seat”).
The Mercedes engineered safety mechanisms that helped preserve Mr Jones’ life, incorporate the engine block being forced under the car and not into the passenger compartment following the tremendous force from such a collision as the one that occurred in the Paris tunnel that night.
The widespread view is that had the Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed been wearing seatbelts they would have likely survived the crash! (Hmmm…perhaps not! Princess Diana did survive the crash and actually spoke to a French Doctor (not affiliated with the authorities who arrived shortly after) who was passing by at the time of the accident and as he administered the 1st First Aid, in his own words said “I thought her life could be saved”).
Princess Diana ultimately died because of a suspicious 2 hour journey in an ambulance that snailed its way to a hospital 3.25 miles away averaging a speed of 25 mph and which conveniently bypassed 4 other hospitals on the way!
As it is there is new evidence that indicates that perhaps the reason Princess Diana was not wearing her seatbelt is because it was mysteriously but very conveniently jammed in such a way as to render it unusable!”
“5. Lynne Ann Cheney (nee Vincent) [PEOC on 9/11 where she disrupted communications between U.S. Vice-President Cheney and U.S. President George Bush; custodian of Lockheed Martin and Access Graphics patent pools used from 1994 to 9/11; her Sisters novel portrays rape and depictions of lesbian sex] http://www.abeldanger.net/2012/08/abel-danger-mischief-makers-mistress-of_2.html
“The FX4 is the classic Black Cab. While the majority are black, there is in fact no requirement for them, or indeed any other make of London taxi to be black. Over the years, the FX4 has been sold under a number of different makers’ names. … As part of a programme to develop a replacement model, AP Lockheed were commissioned to design and develop front disc brakes, and in conjunction, GKN designed a new suspension system to allow disc brakes to be fitted whilst maintaining the mandatory 7.6m turning circle. [Ergo MI-3 Agent Cheney would have had access to Driveline and ‘Boston Brakes’ chips to crash Mercedes-Benz W140 and simulate an accident] These modifications were fitted to a new model, the Fairway Driver, which was introduced in February 1992. The very final Fairway made, with registration mark R1 PFX (i.e. RIP FX), was built on 1 October 1997 and was presented to the National Motor Museum at Beaulieu.”
“The Worshipful Company of Hackney Carriage Drivers is one of the 108 Livery Companies of the City of London. Its members are professional hackney carriage drivers, including London black taxicab drivers who have learnt the knowledge of London.
The Fellowship of Hackney Carriage Drivers was recognised by the City of London Corporation in 1990 and was granted livery in February 2004, becoming the Worshipful Company. The process started with an instruction from Oliver Cromwell to the City’s Court of Aldermen in 1654 on regulating drivers. Legislation created the Fellowship of Master Hackney Coachmen, the first such society for taxi drivers.
The Company’s charity supports any deserving members and their immediate family. It has run an annual taxi tour to Disneyland Paris for children with life threatening illnesses each year since 1994. Its education programme teaches taxi drivers about the history of London and it seeks to promote public awareness about the high standards of the hackney carriage trade. The Company also part-takes in the annual Lord Mayor’s Show.
The Hackney Carriage Drivers’ Company ranks 104th in the order of precedence for the Livery Companies.”
“The Mercedes-Benz W140 is a series of flagship vehicles that were manufactured by the German automotive company Mercedes-Benz. On November 16, 1990, Mercedes-Benz unveiled the W140 S-Class via press release, later appearing in several February and March editions of magazines.The W140 made its public debut at the Geneva Motor Show in March 1991, with the first examples rolling off the production line in April 1991 and North American examples on August 6, 1991. Short (SE) and long (SEL) wheelbase sedans were offered initially, as well as the coupé (SEC) body style from October 1992. Like all Mercedes-Benz lines, the W140 S-Class was rationalized in late 1993 using the new “letter-first” nomenclature. The SE, SEL, and SEC cars were renamed the S-Class, with alphanumerical designations inverted. For example, the 500 SE became the S 500, and the 500 SEL became the S 500 L. In 1996 the coupé models following a mid-life update were separated into the CL-Class. The W140 series S-Class was superseded by the W220 S-Class sedan and C215 CL-Class coupe in 1999 after an eight-year production run. … In late 1991, after worldwide launch, work begun on improvements to the W140. By the end of 1992, final design changes were approved and later patented (application) on February 27, 1993, exactly 5 years after the original W140 design patent application in 1988. In March 1994, the updated models were unveiled at the Geneva Auto Salon and went on sale in April 1994 in mainland Europe and in other markets during the second half of the year. The clear turn signal indicator lenses on the front and new taillights were the most obvious change, as was the grille including a new and distinctive one for S 600s. Headlamps were fitted with separate low H7, H1 fog, and high H1 beam reflectors in 1994, pre-1995 models used an H4 bulb and H3 for the fog lamp. In April 1995, “Parktronic” replaced the parking guiders on the rear boot lid.
In 1995, the two tone exterior appearance was made to be monotone, xenon headlamps were added and the rear indicator lenses became clear. The changes were later introduced in June 1996 as 1996.5 models in Europe and 1997 models in the United States.
Height of the W140 production models varied between years (1992-94 W140 Sedan: 58.7 in; 1992-94 V140 Sedan: 58.9 in; 1995-96 W140 Sedan: 58.4 in; 1997-99 V140 Sedan: 58.3 in; C140 Coupe: 56.7 in; 1997-99 W140 Sedan: 58.5 in).
The car is infamous for being the model in which Diana, Princess of Wales died following a high-speed car accident in which she (as with the driver and the other passengers) was not wearing her seat belt and the driver was intoxicated. Princess Diana, driver Henri Paul and partner Dodi Al Fayed died as a result of the accident.”
“GKN Driveline teams across the world that specialise in developing new technology for automotive driveline components are based in our world-class research and product development centres, and global product centres in Asia, Europe and North America. They often work in close partnership with leading vehicle manufacturers, solving the challenges of the future, and producing the technological developments that will drive the best of tomorrow’s cars.
GKN Driveline has been granted over 500 patents for new inventions and operates licensing arrangements for the use of this technology to its’ partner companies”
“Mercedes-Benz to invest $2 billion in Alabama plant
22 July 2011
Luxury carmaker Mercedes-Benz is pumping $2 billion into its Alabama manufacturing plant.
Mercedes-Benz has set its sights on expansion in the US, having announced its plans to invest $2 billion (£1.2 billion) in its plant in Vance, Alabama.
The luxury car manufacturer – and GKN Driveline customer – flew in its top man Dieter Zetsche, chairman of parent company Daimler AG, to the southern state to declare that the automaker will be pumping this vast investment into its Vance operations over the coming years.
He said the investment would be for the M-Class, GL-Class and C-Class expansion, but the organisation would continue to look into other products that could be added to the production line.
“We are continuing to write new chapters of the plant’s success story with significant investments into the future,” Mr Zetsche remarked.
The money will be spent between now and 2014, when Mercedes’ C-Class sedans in Vance will be in full production.
GKN Driveline currently operates four manufacturing locations in US and one engineering centre.”